XSF Discussion - 2013-02-22


  1. Jef has left

  2. Jef has joined

  3. Jef has left

  4. Jef has joined

  5. Jef has left

  6. Jef has joined

  7. Kev has left

  8. Jef has left

  9. Jef has joined

  10. Jef has left

  11. Jef has joined

  12. Ashley has left

  13. Jef has left

  14. Jef has joined

  15. Jef has left

  16. Jef has joined

  17. arcriley has left

  18. arcriley has joined

  19. Jef has left

  20. Jef has joined

  21. Jef has left

  22. Jef has joined

  23. Lance has left

  24. Lance has joined

  25. Ashley has joined

  26. ralphm has left

  27. Lance has left

  28. Jef has left

  29. stpeter has left

  30. Lance has joined

  31. Lance

    bear: don't forget bosh updates. I'm catching up on mine

  32. Lance

    hjkkll

  33. bear

    I haven't (completely) - working on some last night and will again later

  34. arcriley has left

  35. arcriley has joined

  36. Lance has left

  37. Neustradamus has left

  38. Neustradamus has joined

  39. Neustradamus has left

  40. Neustradamus has joined

  41. Kev has joined

  42. Kev has left

  43. Ashley has left

  44. Ashley has joined

  45. Ashley has left

  46. Kev has joined

  47. Lance has left

  48. bear has left

  49. Lance has joined

  50. Lance has left

  51. Ashley has joined

  52. Neustradamus has left

  53. Neustradamus has joined

  54. ralphm has left

  55. Ashley has left

  56. Neustradamus has left

  57. Neustradamus has joined

  58. bear has joined

  59. bear has left

  60. bear has joined

  61. Neustradamus has joined

  62. ralphm has left

  63. Kev has left

  64. Neustradamus has joined

  65. stpeter has joined

  66. ralphm has left

  67. Ashley has joined

  68. Ashley has left

  69. Lance has joined

  70. Ashley has joined

  71. Ashley has left

  72. Ashley has joined

  73. Ashley has left

  74. Ashley has joined

  75. Lance has left

  76. Ashley has left

  77. Ashley has joined

  78. Ashley has left

  79. Neustradamus has left

  80. Ashley has joined

  81. Ashley has left

  82. Ashley has joined

  83. Ashley has left

  84. Ashley has joined

  85. Neustradamus has joined

  86. Neustradamus has left

  87. Ashley has left

  88. Ashley has joined

  89. Neustradamus has joined

  90. Kev has joined

  91. bear

    drive by comment: (heading out for a walk) -- I started the whole github thread knowing that I would be asking kev and peter for access to start working on its infrastructure

  92. Kev

    I don't understand what the underlying aim with GitHub is.

  93. bear

    my goal is to document github, web page and wiki config and setup so that 1) we have docs and 2) it's easier for a small infra team to manage

  94. Kev

    I'd be much happier with us doing anything about it if I knew what the perceived benefit was.

  95. bear

    the conversation quickly expanded beyond what I was asking

  96. bear

    I just thought about having it as a read-only mirror

  97. Kev

    We already have that on gitorious.

  98. bear

    but then I got to thinking about making it bi-directional when kurt brought up TOS

  99. Kev

    So I'm not sure what going to github buys is there.

  100. bear

    yea, but github has a much nicer interface and (this is my personal thought) I'm already using it every single day so why not enable it also

  101. Kev

    I'm not strictly opposed to mirroring to github.

  102. Kev

    The reward doesn't seem significant to me, but neither does the cost.

  103. bear

    so I figured small steps

  104. Kev

    Although the moment people start trying to send in pull requests via github things suddenly become much more 'interesting'.

  105. bear

    the core part of this is, basically: if it's a low cost item to add another way of viewing XFS data then why not

  106. Lance

    Kev and that's Kurt's point about terms of service, IPR considerations, etc

  107. Lance

    but +1 on basic mirroring

  108. Kev

    I'm not sure what that's Kurt's point, when I raised it first, but oh well!

  109. bear

    right, and it is that interesting part that has me thinking of how to solve it - but that is a future change

  110. bear

    :)

  111. Kev

    I don't see why that would add value to us, and it seems like lots of pain.

  112. Kev

    I'm happy to delay having that argument until we want to do it, but there will be an argument.

  113. Kev

    By which I obviously mean a healthy debate between great minds.

  114. bear

    lets get the mirroring up and then read the TOS and see how scary it is

  115. bear

    LOL

  116. Kev

    Well, the ToS hit us the moment we mirror.

  117. bear

    is it that onerous?

  118. Kev

    At the time, they were onerous enough that we weren't willing to host Swift there, IIRC.

  119. Kev

    How they've changed in the interim who knows...

  120. bear

    hmm, I will have to read it - and then go check on my own repos

  121. bear

    ok, that will be homework for next board meeting - right now i need to run and then later finish my bosh patches

  122. Kev

    Enjoy.

  123. bear waves

  124. Kev

    And thanks for trying to Do Stuff.

  125. Kev has left

  126. Ashley

    i don't really see how the github ToS is very controversial

  127. Ashley

    as i read it, it seems to be quite explicit about github *not* owning any copyright or IP

  128. Kev has joined

  129. ralphm

    Yeah, I'd be interested in that too

  130. ralphm

    On github vs. gitorious, besides legal issues, I think people are just more familiar with github. The only reason I have a gitorious account is because I wanted to see how cloning the xmpp repo would work. I find their way horrible.

  131. Kev

    ISTR the problem I had with it long ago (for Swift) wasn't assigning copyright, but granting a license, including granting a license to code I don't own, and therefore can't grant them a license.

  132. Kev

    e.g. BSD code in Swiften.

  133. Kev

    This would likely not apply to the XSF.

  134. ralphm

    granting a license to github, so that they publish and copy repos?

  135. Kev

    Yes.

  136. Ashley

    ok, let me look at that language, if i can find it

  137. Kev

    This was years ago, and it may not exist anymore, and isn't pertinent to the XSF anyway.

  138. ralphm

    I agree that'd be kind of useful for the thing to work

  139. Kev

    Or probably wouldn't. IANAL to judge.

  140. ralphm

    Kev: but for you BSD example, how would that be a problem? Did they require *you* granting that license, or that they effectively have such license?

  141. Kev

    That I grant the license.

  142. Kev

    IIRC.

  143. ralphm

    that'd be weird

  144. Kev

    But this was a number of years ago, and I don't remember what I did this afternoon, let alone back then.

  145. Ashley

    i don't see anything like that in the github tos

  146. Ashley

    seems like they try to indemnify themselves to the hilt. I would think that a requirement to grant them license might even be contradictory to indemnification.

  147. Kev

    No idea. I admit that the XSF's IPR policy in general scares me, in my ignorant non-lawyerish state.

  148. Ashley

    lol

  149. Kev

    Not sure it's funny!

  150. ralphm

    https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tosdr/lOG7XeUi-3E

  151. Neustradamus

    waqas reminder: http://tracker.xmpp.org/ is always down :/

  152. ralphm

    and also:

  153. ralphm

    https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/tosdr/github/tosdr/9epXl7ZDb7c/Hksr3zcE-xcJ

  154. Neustradamus

    in the same time, a good news Debian 7 RC1 is out ;)

  155. ralphm

    And there was much rejoicing. ⚐

  156. Neustradamus has left

  157. stpeter has left

  158. Neustradamus has joined

  159. Jef has joined

  160. Neustradamus has left

  161. Neustradamus has joined

  162. Neustradamus has left

  163. Neustradamus has joined

  164. Lance has left

  165. Lance has joined

  166. Ashley has left

  167. ralphm has left

  168. Lance has left