XSF Discussion - 2013-05-13

  1. bear has left

  2. Jef has left

  3. Jef has joined

  4. Neustradamus has left

  5. Neustradamus has joined

  6. kevin has left

  7. Jef has left

  8. Jef has joined

  9. kevin has joined

  10. philip has joined

  11. philip has left

  12. Jef has left

  13. Alex has joined

  14. Lloyd Watkin has joined

  15. Alex has left

  16. Alex has joined

  17. Lloyd Watkin has left

  18. Lloyd Watkin has joined

  19. Jef has joined

  20. Jef has left

  21. Jef has joined

  22. jabberjocke has joined

  23. Jef has left

  24. MattJ has left

  25. MattJ has joined

  26. MattJ has left

  27. MattJ has joined

  28. jabberjocke has left

  29. Jef has joined

  30. Alex has left

  31. stpeter has joined

  32. kevin has left

  33. kevin has joined

  34. Jef has left

  35. kevin has left

  36. Lance has joined

  37. kevin has joined

  38. kevin has left

  39. stpeter has left

  40. kevin has joined

  41. stpeter has joined

  42. Lance has left

  43. kevin has left

  44. Lance has joined

  45. stpeter

    so I'm thinking about holding an XMPP hackathon in Berlin at the end of July, right before the IETF meeting

  46. stpeter

    focused on s2s, federation, DNSSEC, POSH, etc.

  47. stpeter

    and WebSocket maybe :-)

  48. Lance

    I won't be in Berlin, but yeah

  49. Lance

    I got stanza.io working directly with websockets, and even with jumping through the hoop of detecting the stream namespace prefix, it's very easy to get the websocket stuff running

  50. stpeter


  51. stpeter

    we might need to recruit you to talk about the xmpp-over-websocket spec in Berlin :P

  52. Lance

    so i'm -1 on the discussion about needing some new stream start element. it's just too easy to make it work to justify changing the protocol

  53. stpeter nods

  54. stpeter

    that's good to hear

  55. Lloyd Watkin has left

  56. stpeter has left

  57. Jef has joined