XSF Discussion - 2013-05-31

MattJ has left 00:12:03
Lance has left 01:24:04
Lance has joined 01:29:29
Kev has left 02:18:34
Lance has left 03:12:15
Lance has joined 04:14:06
Lance has left 05:00:49
Lance has left 05:02:59
Lance has joined 05:03:07
Lance has left 05:17:52
Lance has joined 05:17:56
Lance_ has joined 05:19:46
Lance_ has left 05:25:59
Lance_ has joined 05:26:26
Lance has left 05:33:27
Lance_ has left 05:33:32
Lance has joined 05:33:49
Alex has joined 06:27:32
Alex has left 06:29:19
Lance has left 07:31:42
Lloyd has joined 08:02:22
Lloyd has left 09:31:33
Lloyd has joined 09:39:02
Zash has joined 11:54:25
Alex has left 13:13:08
ralphm has left 13:21:56
ralphm has left 14:10:47
ralphm has left 15:54:48
stpeter has joined 15:59:42
Lloyd has joined 16:00:42
Lance has joined 16:13:58
stpeter has left 16:23:41
stpeter has joined 16:23:52
stpeter has left 16:28:43
stpeter has joined 16:28:51
stpeter has left 16:29:39
stpeter has joined 16:30:11
Lance has joined 16:31:20
stpeter has left 16:34:50
Lance has joined 16:36:51
stpeter has joined 16:42:19
ralphm has left 17:40:21
Alex has joined 19:00:33
Kev has left 19:16:36
Lance has left 19:33:05
Lance has joined 19:35:23
Zash has left 19:56:30
Alex has left 20:02:55
Alex has joined 20:09:18
Kev has left 21:16:42
Zash has joined 21:47:30
stpeter has left 21:48:46
Zash 21:50:24
Is it not common for bylaws to require qualified majority on multiple consequitive meetings for changing (parts of) the bylaws?
Lance has joined 21:53:42
Lance has joined 21:58:43
Jef has joined 22:08:42
Alex has left 22:18:28
jabberjocke has left 22:37:29
Lance has joined 23:29:06
Lance has joined 23:43:45
Jef has left 23:50:12
Jef has joined 23:52:01
Jef has left 23:57:26