XSF Discussion - 2013-05-31


  1. MattJ has left

  2. Lance has left

  3. Lance has joined

  4. Kev has left

  5. Lance has left

  6. Lance has joined

  7. Lance has left

  8. Lance has left

  9. Lance has joined

  10. Lance has left

  11. Lance has joined

  12. Lance_ has joined

  13. Lance_ has left

  14. Lance_ has joined

  15. Lance has left

  16. Lance_ has left

  17. Lance has joined

  18. Alex has joined

  19. Alex has left

  20. Lance has left

  21. Lloyd has joined

  22. Lloyd has left

  23. Lloyd has joined

  24. Zash has joined

  25. Alex has left

  26. ralphm has left

  27. ralphm has left

  28. ralphm has left

  29. stpeter has joined

  30. Lloyd has joined

  31. Lance has joined

  32. stpeter has left

  33. stpeter has joined

  34. stpeter has left

  35. stpeter has joined

  36. stpeter has left

  37. stpeter has joined

  38. Lance has joined

  39. stpeter has left

  40. Lance has joined

  41. stpeter has joined

  42. ralphm has left

  43. Alex has joined

  44. Kev has left

  45. Lance has left

  46. Lance has joined

  47. Zash has left

  48. Alex has left

  49. Alex has joined

  50. Kev has left

  51. Zash has joined

  52. stpeter has left

  53. Zash

    Is it not common for bylaws to require qualified majority on multiple consequitive meetings for changing (parts of) the bylaws?

  54. Lance has joined

  55. Lance has joined

  56. Jef has joined

  57. Alex has left

  58. jabberjocke has left

  59. Lance has joined

  60. Lance has joined

  61. Jef has left

  62. Jef has joined

  63. Jef has left