XSF Discussion - 2013-11-21

  1. Jef has left

  2. Lance has left

  3. Lance has joined

  4. Lance has left

  5. Lance has joined

  6. tato has joined

  7. dwd has joined

  8. Lance has joined

  9. tato has left

  10. dwd has left

  11. bear has left

  12. bear has joined

  13. fippo

    the problem about google is not adding a gmail exception

  14. fippo

    it's having to add a hosted-on-google-apps exception

  15. bear has left

  16. bear has joined

  17. fippo

    so that would be an exception for anything whose srv records points to xmpp-server.l.google.com. or any of it's 1.l, 2.l, 3.l or 4.l cousins

  18. Alex has joined

  19. SouL has left

  20. SouL has joined

  21. SouL has left

  22. Alex has left

  23. bear has left

  24. Ashley Ward has joined

  25. SouL has joined

  26. Lance has joined

  27. intosi has joined

  28. dwd has joined

  29. Alex has joined

  30. ralphm

    fippo: indeed

  31. intosi has left

  32. intosi has joined

  33. intosi has left

  34. intosi has joined

  35. intosi has left

  36. intosi has joined

  37. SouL has left

  38. fsteinel has joined

  39. tato has joined

  40. fsteinel has left

  41. Lloyd has joined

  42. Jef has joined

  43. Jef has left

  44. tato has left

  45. jabberjocke has joined

  46. Lance has joined

  47. Zash has joined

  48. tato has joined

  49. SouL has joined

  50. fsteinel has joined

  51. jabberjocke has left

  52. fsteinel has left

  53. Lloyd

    How people see XMPP when they look at the server list on the xmpp.org site: https://twitter.com/bobpoekert/status/403302786747486209

  54. Kev

    If having implementations in many languages is 'crusty', it's not clear to me that crusty is a bad thing.

  55. Kev

    The list of dead servers is another matter.

  56. Lloyd

    Have you read the replies? A comment that came up in Portland, many in the list aren't actively developed..

  57. Lloyd

    …what you just said :)

  58. Kev

    A policy of "Need to rerequest to be added each year" might cause some of the abandoned things to drop off.

  59. Lloyd

    Was just thinking about that. Problem is that it increases admin effort (albeit a small amount) and do we prod projects or do they have to come to us? (I know my answer there).

  60. Ashley Ward has left

  61. Ashley Ward has joined

  62. Alex has left

  63. MattJ

    Date of last release as a column? Automate it somehow?

  64. MattJ thinks aloud

  65. Kev

    MattJ: I'm not sure 'date of last release' is as good a metric as 'authors are prepared to relist'.

  66. MattJ

    Last release >1y, project is not active?

  67. Kev

    I don't think that's true.

  68. Kev

    Or, at least "Getting new stuff added" isn't terribly important, "authors are still looking after it" is.

  69. Lloyd

    agreed. If there's someone willing to put the effort in to get their server relisted you can be fairly sure the project is active.

  70. jabberjocke has joined

  71. Neustradamus has joined

  72. tato has left

  73. Simon has joined

  74. Edwin Mons has left

  75. Edwin Mons has joined

  76. Edwin Mons has left

  77. Lance has joined

  78. SouL has left

  79. Lloyd has left

  80. SouL has joined

  81. bear has joined

  82. intosi has left

  83. intosi has left

  84. intosi has joined

  85. Alex has joined

  86. tato has joined

  87. Lance has joined

  88. Lance has joined

  89. intosi has left

  90. intosi has left

  91. tato has left

  92. Simon has left

  93. Lance has joined

  94. Simon has joined

  95. dwd has left

  96. Lance has joined

  97. Simon has joined

  98. Ashley Ward has left

  99. Ashley Ward has joined

  100. dwd has joined

  101. Ashley Ward has left

  102. Simon has left

  103. dwd has left

  104. Lance has left

  105. Lance has joined

  106. stpeter has joined

  107. dwd has joined

  108. intosi has left

  109. intosi has left

  110. intosi has left

  111. Alex has left

  112. dwd has left

  113. bear has left