XSF Discussion - 2013-11-21

  1. Jef has left
  2. Lance has left
  3. Lance has joined
  4. Lance has left
  5. Lance has joined
  6. tato has joined
  7. dwd has joined
  8. Lance has joined
  9. tato has left
  10. dwd has left
  11. bear has left
  12. bear has joined
  13. fippo the problem about google is not adding a gmail exception
  14. fippo it's having to add a hosted-on-google-apps exception
  15. bear has left
  16. bear has joined
  17. fippo so that would be an exception for anything whose srv records points to xmpp-server.l.google.com. or any of it's 1.l, 2.l, 3.l or 4.l cousins
  18. Alex has joined
  19. SouL has left
  20. SouL has joined
  21. SouL has left
  22. Alex has left
  23. bear has left
  24. Ashley Ward has joined
  25. SouL has joined
  26. Lance has joined
  27. intosi has joined
  28. dwd has joined
  29. Alex has joined
  30. ralphm fippo: indeed
  31. intosi has left
  32. intosi has joined
  33. intosi has left
  34. intosi has joined
  35. intosi has left
  36. intosi has joined
  37. SouL has left
  38. fsteinel has joined
  39. tato has joined
  40. fsteinel has left
  41. Lloyd has joined
  42. Jef has joined
  43. Jef has left
  44. tato has left
  45. jabberjocke has joined
  46. Lance has joined
  47. Zash has joined
  48. tato has joined
  49. SouL has joined
  50. fsteinel has joined
  51. jabberjocke has left
  52. fsteinel has left
  53. Lloyd How people see XMPP when they look at the server list on the xmpp.org site: https://twitter.com/bobpoekert/status/403302786747486209
  54. Kev If having implementations in many languages is 'crusty', it's not clear to me that crusty is a bad thing.
  55. Kev The list of dead servers is another matter.
  56. Lloyd Have you read the replies? A comment that came up in Portland, many in the list aren't actively developed..
  57. Lloyd …what you just said :)
  58. Kev A policy of "Need to rerequest to be added each year" might cause some of the abandoned things to drop off.
  59. Lloyd Was just thinking about that. Problem is that it increases admin effort (albeit a small amount) and do we prod projects or do they have to come to us? (I know my answer there).
  60. Ashley Ward has left
  61. Ashley Ward has joined
  62. Alex has left
  63. MattJ Date of last release as a column? Automate it somehow?
  64. MattJ thinks aloud
  65. Kev MattJ: I'm not sure 'date of last release' is as good a metric as 'authors are prepared to relist'.
  66. MattJ Last release >1y, project is not active?
  67. Kev I don't think that's true.
  68. Kev Or, at least "Getting new stuff added" isn't terribly important, "authors are still looking after it" is.
  69. Lloyd agreed. If there's someone willing to put the effort in to get their server relisted you can be fairly sure the project is active.
  70. jabberjocke has joined
  71. Neustradamus has joined
  72. tato has left
  73. Simon has joined
  74. Edwin Mons has left
  75. Edwin Mons has joined
  76. Edwin Mons has left
  77. Lance has joined
  78. SouL has left
  79. Lloyd has left
  80. SouL has joined
  81. bear has joined
  82. intosi has left
  83. intosi has left
  84. intosi has joined
  85. Alex has joined
  86. tato has joined
  87. Lance has joined
  88. Lance has joined
  89. intosi has left
  90. intosi has left
  91. tato has left
  92. Simon has left
  93. Lance has joined
  94. Simon has joined
  95. dwd has left
  96. Lance has joined
  97. Simon has joined
  98. Ashley Ward has left
  99. Ashley Ward has joined
  100. dwd has joined
  101. Ashley Ward has left
  102. Simon has left
  103. dwd has left
  104. Lance has left
  105. Lance has joined
  106. stpeter has joined
  107. dwd has joined
  108. intosi has left
  109. intosi has left
  110. intosi has left
  111. Alex has left
  112. dwd has left
  113. bear has left