ralphm: by those funny rules the answer seems to be yes
fippo
but bear, who hummed in the jabber room on the topic of h.264 vs vp8 is not
tatohas joined
Alexhas joined
Jefhas joined
Zashhas joined
SouLhas left
SouLhas joined
ralphmhas left
Jefhas left
tatohas left
Jefhas joined
Alexhas left
Simonhas joined
Zashhas left
tatohas joined
Zashhas joined
MattJhas left
MattJhas joined
tatohas left
tatohas joined
Simonhas left
Zashhas joined
Zashhas joined
Simonhas joined
Simonhas joined
Neustradamushas left
Neustradamushas left
tatohas left
fsteinelhas joined
fsteinelhas left
Alexhas joined
SouLhas left
SouLhas joined
jabberjockehas joined
tatohas joined
tatohas left
intosihas left
intosihas joined
Neustradamushas left
bearhas joined
bear
voting at an IETF meeting is allowed just by showing up - there are no "rules" about who can vote or not, if you show up and are interested you vote
bear
that's the votes are done by humms, it's to get a feel if the group as a whole is comfortable with the discussion
fippo
rtcweb doesn't care :-)
bear
that happens sometimes with some WG chairs
fippo
this whole thing is a waste of time... but i think it would be interesting to see what happens when you ask the chairs to count your vote :-)
fippo
would you mind if i claimed that rtcweb@jabber.ietf.org/bear was really me?
bear
if you have a reason to explore that, I do not mind
fippo
well, the logs don't contain any information which proves that rtcweb@jabber.ietf.org/bear was really you
MattJ
Does it matter?
bear
right, the jabber logs are informational
MattJ
How do I know you were really you in the room when you hummed? :)
bear
all the work/votes/foo that counts is in the mailing list
bear
well, physical room events they pass around a piece of paper for folks to register, but even that is optional as quite a few folks don't identify *at all* during meetings
fippo
well, not counting the people in the jabber room is going to add negative bias to the pro-vp8 camp