XSF Discussion - 2015-10-30

hi

Hello, Ideally I would like a little help with XEP-0450.7.2.18-T9 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#table-9> , and the "cosmetic" "triviality" presented, thereafter. This, so I might be more effectively be able to deal with those ≤80_-_XEP-0148.4.1 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0148.html#impl-levels> end-users = XEP-0148.2 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0148.html#concepts> Such as when I have XEP-0045.15.7.2 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#registrar-querytypes-invite> 'd them; whereas a fellow tech' testing, has experienced 406 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes#406>. This, where I have preconditioned, via XEP-0045.10.2 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#roomconfig> , XEP-0045.7.2.5 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#enter-semianon> , optionally XEP-0045.7.2.6 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#enter-pw> (providing, of course, the variable), and XEP-0045.7.2.7 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#enter-members> . Thus, they must: XEP-0450.7.10 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#register> , & XEP-0450.7.13 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#requestvoice> , & I would subsequently XEP-0450.8.3 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#grantvoice> them. I have been already been given the "helpful", "Google is your friend." (withOUT LMGTFY), and "If it's not verbatim, in a(n) RFC/JEP/XEP it does not, or should not exist". Ergo, I have been disabused of the old, sagely wisdom "Experience is the best teacher.", so, instead of asking, to learn from one with experience, since, "The XEP is the best teacher", I ask the XEP what it would do, in real-world, applied situations. WWXEPD? I find no local unix-like RFC-862 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc862> , but, that's what these MUC's seem most useful as, with some RFC-862 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc862> 'ers.

Hm... still not enough people running for the board (or council really; I feel like you need at least double the number of open slots, but board seems more pressing). Time to last minute press gang people...

SamWhited: heya

SamWhited: hmm yeah

I'm pinging people who have business / administration experience (and XMPP experience, of course). No idea if any of them will bite.

Ah, you've reminded me to follow up with a couple.

I better hide then

Zash: Damn, you were next on my list (no really)

does MUC2 allow one nick to be shared my different bare JIDs? ✏

In theory, MUC could allow you to do that, just like multiple full jids of the same account.

yeah...but how would it know that it's allowed?

Yeah, that was brought up when we were designing it; if you grant access to the registration node to another jid it should just work.

IIRC

https://stpeter.im/files/mix.html#disco-conversation-participants Aw

Zash: MIX needs a lot of work, which I haven't had time for

Who has time?

:)