would it be hard to get some https for mail.jabber.org ?
danielhas left
danielhas joined
dwdhas left
daniel
Is anyone else having problems validating the caps hash of the member bot?
daniel
Or is there something wrong in my implementation
mimi89999has joined
daurnimatorhas left
intosi
mathieui: probably not, I'll take a look some time.
mathieui
intosi, thanks!
daurnimatorhas joined
xnyhpshas joined
xnyhpshas joined
mark.tranhas joined
SouLhas left
dwdhas left
Alexhas left
dwdhas left
Sonnyhas left
Sonnyhas joined
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
Neustradamushas left
mhterreshas joined
dwdhas left
xnyhpshas left
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
Tobiashas left
dwdhas left
mark.tranhas left
tim@boese-ban.dehas joined
xnyhpshas left
mark.tranhas joined
Alexhas joined
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
daurnimatorhas left
xnyhpshas left
Sonnyhas left
Sonnyhas joined
xnyhpshas left
Sonnyhas left
Sonnyhas joined
Sonnyhas left
Sonnyhas joined
xnyhpshas left
daurnimatorhas joined
xnyhpshas left
daurnimatorhas left
Holgerhas left
mimi89999has left
SamWhitedhas joined
Sonnyhas left
Sonnyhas joined
Sonnyhas left
Sonnyhas joined
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
Sonnyhas left
Sonnyhas joined
xnyhpshas left
waqashas left
Zashhas joined
xnyhpshas left
SamWhitedhas joined
Guushas left
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
Guushas left
xnyhpshas joined
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
moparisthebesthas joined
moparisthebesthas joined
xnyhpshas left
Guushas left
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
ralphmhas left
xnyhpshas left
waqashas joined
narcodehas joined
mimi89999has joined
dwdhas left
ralphmhas left
xnyhpshas joined
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
ralphmhas joined
dwdhas left
SamWhitedhas joined
Yagizahas left
Yagizahas joined
SamWhitedhas joined
dwdhas left
ralphmhas left
kandarhas left
kandarhas joined
dwdhas left
goffihas left
SouLhas left
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
mark.tranhas joined
mimi89999has joined
goffihas joined
waqashas left
dwdhas left
Flowhas left
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
ralphmhas left
SamWhitedhas left
SamWhitedhas joined
Guushas left
ralphmhas joined
Guushas left
dwdhas left
danielhas left
danielhas joined
kandarhas left
kandarhas joined
dwdhas left
mimi89999has left
tim@boese-ban.dehas joined
tim@boese-ban.dehas joined
kalkinhas left
kalkinhas left
dwdhas left
SamWhitedhas left
SamWhitedhas joined
Sonnyhas left
Sonnyhas joined
brahas joined
goffihas joined
goffihas joined
ralphmhas left
mimi89999has joined
dwdhas left
ralphmhas joined
Alexhas left
Zashhas left
waqashas joined
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
Lancehas joined
dwdhas left
SouLhas left
dwdhas left
mhterreshas left
xnyhpshas joined
kandarhas left
kandarhas joined
boothj5has joined
Guushas left
Tobiashas joined
goffihas joined
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
xnyhpshas left
goffihas joined
Yagizahas left
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
tim@boese-ban.dehas joined
tim@boese-ban.dehas joined
Sonnyhas left
Sonnyhas joined
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
Sonnyhas left
Sonnyhas joined
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
waqashas left
goffihas left
ralphmhas joined
bearhas left
winfriedhas joined
bearhas joined
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
Lancehas joined
dwdhas left
Lancehas joined
SamWhitedhas left
SamWhitedhas joined
boothj5has left
boothj5has joined
dwdhas left
dwdhas left
goffihas joined
dwdhas left
boothj5has left
boothj5has joined
SamWhitedhas left
SamWhitedhas joined
dwdhas left
Link Mauve
I’m reading MIX, and section 3 says “A user's participation in a channel outlives their presence session. A user who is offline will not share presence within the channel, but will still be listed as an participant. This too is a significant departure from MUC.” How would that model fit with very short-lived sessions, like the typical help channel where participants use an anonymous JID and are gone forever once they close their browser tab?
Lancehas joined
dwdhas left
moparisthebesthas joined
dwdhas left
Link Mauve
Or are such users expected to continue to use the MUC protocol instead?