XSF Discussion - 2016-12-27

  1. Link Mauve

    Tobias, thanks, I haven’t looked at the program at all yet. :x

  2. Tobias

    Link Mauve, will you be there?

  3. Link Mauve

    I am already there.

  4. Link Mauve

    Just came back from the CCH.

  5. Tobias

    nice :) looking forward to meeting you again then :)

  6. Link Mauve

    I will probably spend a lot of time around fail0verflow and La Quadrature people.

  7. Tobias looks that up in the wiki

  8. Link Mauve

    La Quadrature is where nice tea is.

  9. Tobias

    ahhh :)

  10. daniel

    Tobias: oh you are going to be there as well?

  11. daniel

    Me too

  12. Tobias

    daniel, yeah..will be on my way in a bit

  13. Ge0rG

    Link Mauve, I've had an awesome ctf with fail0verflow and iOS hackers some 11 years ago

  14. Link Mauve

    ^^

  15. Link Mauve

    Now they are playing with lasers. :D

  16. daniel

    mancho: are you the libpurple omemo mancho?

  17. mancho

    daniel: jup ;)

  18. blipp

    mancho: I just wrote you an IM regarding your work on OMEMO for Pidgin. I started working on it, too. It would be cool if we could discuss this, so we don't do the same work twice ;)

  19. Tobias

    Can a PubSub item have more than one child?

  20. goffi

    Tobias: according to https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0060.html#schemas-pubsub it can

  21. goffi

    actually maxOccurs is not specified, I'm not sure what is the default in this case

  22. goffi

    Tobias: the default is 1, so according to the schema it can't actually, sorry for my first asumption. I don't see anything in the text to confirm this though, so maybe ralphm or somebody else can give a more secure answer

  23. Tobias

    Goffi, if so, it would be I've way to add a media-sharing Tag and reference it from the XHTML atom entry via an ni:// URI

  24. vanitasvitae

    Tobias: OMEMO device lists are pubsub items and have multiple children (or am I mixing up something?)

  25. Tobias

    Right. So it should be allowed at least.

  26. vanitasvitae

    I guess... :)

  27. goffi

    Tobias: I see no reason why it would need to be limited, IMO the schema need to be fixed and several children should be allower

  28. goffi

    allowed*

  29. Tobias

    Great. So that solution would work for you, as a response to the question you mailed regarding SIMS?

  30. goffi

    Tobias: for me yes, I don't think it would be a good idea to add it to the entry as the entry is an atom element.

  31. goffi

    Tobias: thanks for taking care of this remark by the way :)

  32. Tobias

    Great. Then I will add an example like that later today

  33. goffi

    cool, thanks

  34. Tobias

    You're welcome