XSF Discussion - 2017-12-30

  1. pep.

    `<feature var='http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0116.html#ns'/>` does it happen often that features use such a URI?

  2. pep.

    wow, esessions come with a whole bunch of companion XEPs.., 210, 188, 200, 155, 187..

  3. Flow

    pep: Thanks for the writeup

  4. pep.

    It's not really complete, I started halfway but I think I got most of it. I'll ping people for input today and send it

  5. daniel

    Esessions is weird. And it's sessions with a stream of stanza. Not individual, archiveable stanzas

  6. daniel

    I actually proposed to do something like that for when you are trying to exchange iqs

  7. daniel

    So messages will be encrypted individually. But when you have a back and forth you use something like esessions.

  8. daniel

    So you only need one parser instance for the entire session

  9. pep.

    Iirc linked Mauve and Astro were discussing about it at the very end

  10. pep.

    Iirc Link Mauve and Astro were discussing about it at the very end

  11. Steve Kille

    Most MUCs I see have no subject, or no useful subject

  12. Steve Kille

    sorry - wrong MUC

  13. vanitasvitae

    Steve Kille: point proven?

  14. Ge0rG

    Steve Kille: most MUCs also lack a proper name.

  15. mathieui

    talking of topics, are we still in board meeting?

  16. Ge0rG

    mathieui: yes. But it's not the longest one yet.