Dave CridlandFor what it's worth, we copied the password text straight from the original, and the security considerations are really a first cut, but I think passwords are fine here, it's just that they're not real security.
SaltyBonesGe0rG, why not? I have no clue how those work...
jonasw<password>foo</password>
jonaswseen by your server
Steve Killehas left
ZashI haven't really seen many password-protected MUCs
jonaswyeah, members-only feels more effective and useful anyways
Steve Killehas joined
alexishas left
alexishas joined
Ge0rGhas joined
Valerianhas joined
Steve Killehas left
Valerianhas left
Valerianhas joined
remkohas left
danielhas left
moparisthebesthas joined
danielhas left
remkohas left
ZashA one-time-use password that grats membership would have been nice. Probably could hack it serverside, but are clients going to keep sending the password?
jonaswZash, that’s the MUC invitation thing I asked for a few months ago when the whole PARS stuff was going on
Ge0rGhas joined
Guushas left
Alexhas joined
ludohas joined
ralphmhas left
ralphmhas joined
ZashHow often are people changing their bookmarks from two clients at once?
ZashI had the same question about MAM settings IIRC
MattJAs I said on the list, the same applies to just about every operation we have
ZashMattJ: Oh, you said that now? I was still reading the one before yours :)
ludohas left
xnyhpshas left
SaltyBoneshas left
SaltyBoneshas joined
Dave Cridlandhas left
marmistrzhas left
flowxep395 was written with things like groupchat subject nodes in mind, FWIW
tuxhas joined
flowi.e. items that could be potentially modified by multiple entities
Guushas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
Nekithas joined
Dave Cridlandhas left
Guushas left
SaltyBoneshas left
Ge0rGhas left
Alexhas left
Ge0rGhas left
danielhas left
Ge0rGhas left
efrithas joined
ludohas joined
Alexhas joined
ludohas left
ludohas joined
danielhas left
danielhas joined
Guushas left
ludohas left
tim@boese-ban.dehas left
jubalhhas joined
jubalhhas left
lumihas joined
efrithas left
ludohas joined
pep.Fun fact, related to the groupchat terminology thread, https://docs.mattermost.com/help/getting-started/organizing-conversations.html, Mattermost has "private channels" _and_ "group messages", that are literally the same thing from what I understand, apart that group messages are limited to 7 members.
pep.*puzzled*
Valerianhas left
Valerianhas joined
ludohas left
alexishas left
alexishas joined
alexishas joined
alexishas left
Valerianhas left
alexishas joined
pep."Group message channels are useful for fluid/ad-hoc conversations among users.
Private channels are more useful when there's a concrete topic to discuss and you want to preserve the message history, or at least have an easy way to collect and refer to it later. You can also add more people to an existing private channel conversation and make it public later."
From a mattermost person.
jonaswso for group messages there’s no history?
pep.apparently.
jonaswhmm
pep.I don't like this split personally
pep.I want history, everywhere, all the time
jonaswthat solves the "what about history in an ad-hoc group discussion?" issue clearly :D
jonaswpep., was discussed at summit, it’s not trivial
pep.how so
jonaswfor example, group conversation between Alice, Bob and Carol. At some point, Bob and Carol talk about Dianne, maybe planning an Intervention for her weird behaviour regarding hats. Then the discussion evolves and they need to invite Dianne to discuss some plans next week.
jonaswif Dianne has access to the history, that’s bad
jonaswif Alice, Bob and Carol need to do UI dances to prevent her from doing so, that’s also bad.
pep.they create another channel and move on?
KevI like Slack's approach here, personally.
jonaswKev, how does slack handle this?
Kev"Would you like to preserve history? If you do, Dianne will be able to see it. If you don't, it will be removed for everyone"
jonasw(also, I have no idea how I came up with the hats thing and now I kinda want to know what Dianne does with hats.)
jonaswKev, when inviting a new person or when first creating the channel?
KevIt's not perfect, obviously, but it's functional enough and not surprising.
KevWhen inviting a new person to a private channel.
alexishas joined
jonaswthat’s neat
ZashIt's possible to restrict history to only those present to see it
jonaswZash, with MUC, that’s not great either, because you drop out temporarily during connectivity issues.
marmistrzhas left
Zashjonasw: Well, you can base it on affiliation, not presence.
jonaswZash, right
KevMost people have no affiliation
KevBut yes.
ZashDepends on the room
jonaswKev, in private channels, you’d typically need member affiliation
jonaswbecause you want them to be members-only
ZashIf it's for private team chat then they probably do
jonaswso that makes sense.
pep.I usually set affiliations on my channels
KevIt's not hugely straightforward to limit per-message history based on affilation at that time, though.
efrithas joined
pep.But that could be automated anyway
KevPossible, obviously, but not hugely straightforward.
jonaswKev, implementation-wise?
KevYeah.
pep.jonasw> if Dianne has access to the history, that’s bad
jonasw> if Alice, Bob and Carol need to do UI dances to prevent her from doing so, that’s also bad.
pep.> they create another channel and move on?
jonasw ^, probably what's happening internally in mattermost already
pep.When inviting a new person
ZashI imagine it gets complicated if you want newly invited persons to see some history from before they were invited, but not all
ZashWhere on the metaphorical scale from 'actual private room' to 'written notes on a public board' scale do you wanna be?
jonaswhas left
jonaswhas joined
Zash"bulletin board" was the term
pep.Everybody's got different use cases, so trying to please everyone is hard
pep.I think we should just give up already
jonaswrm -rf xmpp.org
pep.git push
ZashThe life of a potato-farming hermit is the ultimate solution
nycohas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas joined
pep.Is there any "goal" defined by the XSF as to what they're trying to achieve. What public they're targetting
edhelasln -s xmpp.org matrix.org
jonaswedhelas, :(
jonaswpep., no
Zashpep.: XEP-hearding
pep.If not I thought that should be on the list
jonaswyeah, that
Zashherd-ing?
Zashhow2engrish
Andrew Nenakhovhas joined
pep.I think.
jonaswthe XSF isn’t targeting any public. the folks authoring XEPs and developing software are.
pep.Yeah, that's a bit too broad
jonaswthe subgroup of that which is interested in making a good IM system should probably come up with something though.
ZashI do think it'd be nice if Council or Board wrote some kind of vision statement.
edhelasthe issue is that lots of app are also using XMPP for non-IM stuff
pep.Then I can just read the statement and say "Ok I want in", or "It's not for me", and not try hard to move it my way when it's never going to go where I want
edhelasI fully understand that it's the core thing but sometime it's a bit too focused
pep.Would make sense. I guess you can already do that with forms? Or just redirect to a web page for the whole thing, but I do prefer the "in-band" part of IBR.
pep.Though admittedly, EULA would most likely be an http link
jonaswit would be good to hvae the common things as structured data so that clients can display a summary
jonaswlike:
[ ] encrypted storage
data automatically deleted after [ ] days
…
ZashIt would be good if this could be negotiated
ZashAs in, that the client can say "I understand these things"
ZashOr you end up like if you try to use extended registration forms now, with nothing working and no way to indicate why
jonaswZash, yeah sure
pep.yeah, having data forms support for IBR in clients would help
lskdjfhas left
moparisthebest"XEP-XXXX Standardized list of things server admins can lie about" ?
moparisthebestkeeps logs, encrypted storage, we promise to try SUPER HARD not to look at your data
pep.moparisthebest, better than non standardized list of things that server admins can lie about? :)
jonaswmoparisthebest, sure, they can lie about, but if they make false statements they’re liable for that
ZashCan't just go on the internet and tell lies
jonaswbut statements are required as per EU-GDPR
moparisthebestjust seems super useless
jonaswso better have some standardised way to make it easy for everyone
moparisthebestoh who would have guessed govt regulation would turn out to be useless :)
ZashUm
pep.moparisthebest, you trust or you don't trust statements of your server admin, that's your issue
pep.But let them tell their lies
moparisthebestpep., I'd rather avoid the false sense of security and foster a healthy distrust of server admins
ZashCivilized society needs its privacy statements and agreements.
pep.moparisthebest, I want my users to be aware of how I operate
pep.Otherwise they don't get to use my service
moparisthebestmeh I don't think it does Zash , I'd prefer to just solve the problem with technology
moparisthebestotherwise why even bother with things like TLS ? just ask intermediaries to promise not to look at your traffic?
ZashYou know what they say about technical solutions to social problems?
ZashWhy bother with locks. It's pretty easy to pick them anyways.
ZashLocks aren't entirely a techical thing. It's part social signal, part technical.
ZashAnd then things like the legaly system to deal with people who break it. And insurance to reduce the damages.
ZashMain reason why TLS needs to basically be perfect is that those civilization things don't scale to Internet-sized groups
waqashas joined
moparisthebestI guess the scaling thing is the concern, if I run a server for friends/family, we don't need any statements/agreements, and if I run a server for the public, statements/agreements are useless because they are unenforceable anyway, and they don't trust me
ZashI do wonder how GDPR relates to self-/small-group-of-friends hosting
marmistrzhas joined
jonaswZash, tricky, I’m not sure if third parties can hold you liable.
marmistrzhas left
Zashmoparisthebest: Myeah, we haven't completely figured out how society works with Internet-scale communications yet.
jonaswmoparisthebest, let’s talk about unenforceable again when the privacy regulator comes knocking on your door because there’s evidence that your public service stored my messages without my consent :)
jonasw(of course, you can point at your records and say "but you enabled MAM" and then I’m like "wtf are you talking about" and then we figure out that my client did that behind my back and now nobody knows who the f* is actually liable for that)
alexishas joined
ZashWe can't have 100% perfect enforcement. But most people are mostly honest most of the time, so usually things work out fine.
jonasw(alternatively, you figure out that prosody has been enabling MAM without explicit consent since forever and you’re screwed because you didn’t properly vet the software you’re using)
Zash> THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
etc...
jonaswpep., speaking of things, one probably also needs versioning for the privacy policy when we’re doing that
jonaswZash, that’s why I said "you’re screwed" and not "the prosody folks are screwed" :)
jonaswpep., so that servers can keep track of the version of the policy accepted by the user and re-ask them when things ch ange
ZashThe balancing act between consent of the user, intent of the admin, UX ...
moparisthebestalso how do they expect to enforce this over the 90% of internet they have 0 control over?
moparisthebestI'm not even sure if, being a US citizen, this applies to me if my server is in germany...
ZashYeah, how do these things work with federation?
jonaswmoparisthebest, it obviously only affects entities offering services in the EU.
jonaswmoparisthebest, doesn’t matter, it applies to you if you have EU customers.
jonasw(or users)
moparisthebestjonasw, citizens of EU, servers of EU, or users in EU
moparisthebestok, so users in EU, and if I don't comply, how do they expect to force me to?
jonaswI have no idea
jonaswbut users may prefer EU services over US services for this reason.
moparisthebestif I visit the EU one day they arrest me? :P
ZashExtradition agreements are fun.
moparisthebestI'll just never come to EU then I guess
jonaswjust like I’ll never come to the US :-)
jonaswor russia for that matter.
moparisthebestZash, I can't imagine those would apply, that'd be kind of crazy
moparisthebestoops an EU user accessed the server you run in your house in USA, we are gonna send you to EU prison now...
jonaswmoparisthebest, EU is taking data protection rather seriously nowadays, I’m not sure what the punishments are though.
Zashmoparisthebest: Uh, I'd rather imagine that the EU isn't insane like that.
ZashGlob help you if you share some copyrighted files tho
jonaswhaving the GDPR stuff pre-IBR via stream feature magic would be great, it could be incorporated into xmpp.net
jonaswif anybody dares to touch the code that is.
moparisthebestso speaking of what Zash said, bob.com promises no logs, but bob@bob.com messages tom@tom.com and tom.com logs *everything*
moparisthebesthow does this work?
jonaswmoparisthebest, no idea.
danielhas left
moparisthebestdid the administrator of bob.com just break a law
jonaswprobably not
danielhas joined
Zashmoparisthebest: As I said, clarity on how these things relate to non-commercial self-hosting would be good.
moparisthebestah that gives you a warm and fuzzy feeling
jonaswcan the XSF sponsor a lawyer to figure out those use-cases?
moparisthebestI'm probably not going to jail for running a public xmpp server :)
Zashjonasw: and/or the IETF?
jonaswZash, maybe
jonaswshould put that on boards agenda
moparisthebesteveryone run their own xmpp server! you might not even go to jail for it in the EU! :)
ZashOperators of email and other federated things are probably interested as well
moparisthebestyea the answer would probably be identical for email
Zashmoparisthebest: It depends!
ZashEmail is store-and-forward.
ZashIM is ... not?
ZashWasn't.
ZashIs now, with MAM :/
ZashData at rest is considered differently from data in flight.
ZashSometimes? IANAL.
moparisthebestwell smacks is kinda store and forward, so is offline messaging, muc backlog thing
moparisthebestI think it's safe to say 99% of xmpp messages today are store and forward, or at least you can't tell when sending them so you have to treat them as such?
ZashTechnically, it's all store and forward
ZashDown to the packet routing
moparisthebestyea...
moparisthebestseems odd to treat them differently
ZashLegally ... hrrrr
moparisthebestI mean, this is what happens when you get politicians dictating technology, nothing but bad things
Zash> A series of tubes
pep.jonasw, re versioning, yes that'd be cool
pep.Also keep track of acks?
ZashRe that, you could check how it's done in ACME
ZashIIRC you reply with a hash of the legalstuff.pdf
pep.Zash, I'll have a look thanks
Kevhas joined
jonaswgonna send board@ an email
jonaswdone
pep.http://logs.xmpp.org/xsf/ not available on https?
moparisthebestI guess the disconnect makes sense, I'm a programmer, I like technical solutions, politicians are lawyers, they like legal solutions :P
pep.domain not in SANs
moparisthebestand of course only 1 is the correct way... :)
pep.Who do I need to ping to add it?
danielhas left
danielhas joined
jonaswat least Romeo Montague and Juliet Capulet are actually useful examples in this case (regarding Article 9, "Processing of […] data concerning a natural person’s sex life […] shall be prohibited.")
jonaswpep., probably someone from iteam. intosi maybe.
Ge0rGjonasw: I'm probably half in jail already for running a public xmpp server in the EU
jonaswGe0rG, \o/
jonaswyou’ll be interested in next board meeting then ;-)
pep.I'll watch closely as well
Ge0rGRegarding that Sex life thing, now I'm supposed to check all http upload files and immediately delete dick pics?
jonaswGe0rG, no, you just need consent.
jonaswArticle 9 (2) is a long list of exceptions to teh general "shall be prohibited", one of which is "the data subject has given explicit consent to the processing of those personal data for one or more specified purposes, except where Union or Member State law provide that the prohibition referred to in paragraph 1 may not be lifted by the data subject;"
Ge0rGjonasw: I've asked a GDPR specialist recently, and he ran away crying after seeing my server deployment
jonaswhaha
jonaswI bet.
pep.:D
moparisthebestexplicit consent like "By continuing to use this service, you explicitly consent to..." ?
Guushas left
Guushas left
jonaswdunno
pep.I'm going to https://www.cambridgenetwork.co.uk/events/gdpr-itgovernance-march2018/ this week. Let's see if I gather anything interesting
Ge0rGI need to convince my boss that writing a policy for yax.im will be a nice exercise for our younger colleagues
jonaswpep., neat.
jonaswI’ll dump the things I threw at board here so you can mention it there, pep.:
There was some discussion in xsf@ today (actually, is right now). Some of the
points which were mentioned:
General question: Are IM messages to be considered "personal data revealing
racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical
beliefs, or trade union membership, and the processing of genetic data,
biometric data for the purpose of uniquely identifying a natural person, data
concerning health or data concerning a natural person’s sex life or sexual
orientation" in general (article 9)? (I suspect so, IANAL.) If not, I think
most of the following points are moot-ish.
Situation A:
romeo@montague.lit talks to juliet@capulet.lit. While romeo is aware of the
privacy policy of montague.lit (he acknowledged it when registering), he is
not aware of the privacy policy of capulet.lit. capulet.lit decided to store
all IM messages forever, which is probably(? IANAL) something they need
explicit consent for even from other domains.
Situation B:
capulet.lit has a MAM service, but it is opt-in to ensure consent from the
users. (Suppose here that we have protocol to actually show a privacy policy
when users opt-in to MAM.) juliet uses a client which turns on MAM by default.
Who is liable when juliet complains that capulet.lit is storing messages? And
how to avoid this?
Situation C:
coven@chat.shakespeare.lit is a private MUC with MUC MAM enabled. Is this
covered by Article 9 (2) (e) ("processing relates to personal data which are
manifestly made public by the data subject;")? I suspect not, and then we’d
need ways to convey the terms of archival and to express consent when joining
such a MUC. Is this situation different if the MUC is public? I suspect that
this will have to do a lot with how the UI presents it.
Ge0rGmoparisthebest: like with the EU cookie warning...
SamWhitedI've been working on GDPR compliance stuff for weeks now… I'm starting to get chills whenever someone mentions it. Opened this room and thought I'd accidentally started work chat instead.
jonaswSamWhited, :)
pep.SamWhited, :D
MattJDoes anyone actually have the answers to these questions?
Ge0rGMattJ: do you consider "pay a €100k compliance violation fee and stop the offending behavior" a valid answer?
moparisthebestit seems to me the law was specifically crafted to target walled gardens, not federated systems, and it basically makes it impossible to run federated systems...
jonaswMattJ, you’ll find out thursday! (board@xmpp.org is the right adress to dump board agenda at, isn’t it?)
MattJjonasw, I don't know... I haven't received any email, so I don't know where it went to
moparisthebestwhich, politicians ignoring xmpp, fair, but they ignored email too? surely they know about email
jonaswmoparisthebest, they might not know how email works
moparisthebesttrue, if they think of email as gmail...
pep.jonasw, their technical team *might*
jonaswMattJ, I can’t add an agendum to the board trello, can you do that for me when I forward you my email?
MattJjonasw, shall do
MattJGe0rG, I mean, I understand a lot of people are making money from GDPR consulting, but has anyone to date received a €100k compliance violation fee?
moparisthebestwhat if everyone just pulls what I pull on my IRC server, put a statement like "Due to GDPR, citizens of EU are forbidden from using this server" up
moparisthebestand then just not enforce it in practice?
Ge0rGMattJ: no, because the GDPR isn't in effect yet
MattJExactly
jonaswMattJ, enforcement afaik only starts on may 25th
MattJSo nobody knows how the legislation will be interpreted by the courts
MattJI find it unlikely that they would conclude that a non-commercial XMPP service that does not make any money would be forced to pay a €100k fine because they stored someone's groupchat message in an archive
Ge0rGMattJ: the first step will be for the data protection offices to ask companies for their policy documents
Ge0rGMattJ: unlikely isn't impossible
moparisthebestMattJ, and what about a commercial xmpp service that charges $2 per month or something
MattJNo, nothing is impossible
MattJmoparisthebest, fines are usually proportional to company revenue
Ge0rGMattJ: I'm not sure if you would bet your private possessions on that low probability
MattJIANAL, I'm not telling anyone they shouldn't worry about GDPR, I'm just questioning how much you can take a lawyers word today about whether e.g. storing chatroom messages in an archive is legal or not
Ge0rGMattJ: the lawyers don't know either, so they predict the worst case
MattJof course
MattJbut we already know the worst case, without paying the lawyers anything
MattJIf you have to ask, you probably shouldn't be storing it if you want to be 100% safe
jonaswI tried to ask very fundamental questions though. questions to which we should already have an answer before the first xmpp service is sued.
jonaswlike the federation thing
jonaswand with answer I mean a technical way to achieve what’s needed to comply.
jonaswlike what we were discussing earlier with the potential privacy policy XEP
Ge0rGThere was a nice court ruling in Germany recently, regarding WhatsApp. A WhatsApp User requires written consent from all contacts to put their phone number into the cloud.
Ge0rGThat sounds like we need consent from each MUC participant
jonaswoddly, people haven’t stopped using whatsapp :(
Ge0rGjonasw: yes, probably out of ignorance.
jonaswGe0rG, for public MUCs probably not due to Article 9 (2) (e), I guess.
jonaswGe0rG, no, probably because nobody sues their friends and relatives or people with whom they do business over a phone number upload.
alexishas joined
jonaswI wish $unlovedRelative was using whatsapp. that’s a perfect way to break off contact ✎
jonaswI wish $unlovedRelative was using whatsapp. that’s a perfect way to break off contact *and* get some money out ouf it :> ✏
tim@boese-ban.dejonasw, but only if the relative is unloved by the whole family :-)
jonaswtim@boese-ban.de, true :)
Ge0rGjonasw: you will have a hard time getting money out. The best thing you can hope for is a fine, and you need to tell the relative in advance that you don't consent with sharing of your information with third parties
jubalhhas joined
jonaswGe0rG, do I? isn’t it default that I don’t consent?
Ge0rGjonasw: maybe, but you need a willful violation to provoke a fine
jonaswfine.
jubalhhas left
Ge0rGjonasw: I see what you did here.
marmistrzhas left
jonaswfine :)
pep.Ge0rG, "willful violation"?
Ge0rG🤔
Ge0rGpep.: knowing that your behavior is illegal and still continuing. IANAL
pep.I see
pep."But but, I didn't know"
moparisthebestwait, are you saying ignorance of the law IS an excuse?
j.rhas joined
Ge0rGmoparisthebest: only regarding the level of fines you expose yourself to.
Ge0rGmoparisthebest: if you are not a commercial entity, you are not required to understand and implement all of the GDPR requirements.
Ge0rGMaybe.
Ge0rGAt least it is rather improbable that you will be sued for uploading your grandma's cookie receipt to AWS
jonaswhow about your grandmas erotic friend fictions?
Ge0rGjonasw: it depends whether those are real or imaginary friends. With fiction you are subject to copyright, where the civil liability depends on the number of potential readers, with non fiction you are subject to GDPR, and you know the fines there.
jonaswwell your grandma would be a real person and thus at least one subject in that fiction story would be real.
jonasw(at least that’s the limited understanding I got on erotic friend fictions)
Ge0rGjonasw: I would argue that fiction doesn't count as sensitive PII, but probably only if it's clearly labeled as fiction.
moparisthebestalso a possibly upcoming EU law would require disabling e2e and scanning/filtering all stanzas sent https://blog.github.com/2018-03-14-eu-proposal-upload-filters-code/ :'(
Ge0rGI'd be the first one to deploy an OMEMO block filter...
SamWhited*sigh* I can never decide which I hate more, how much we under-regulate the tech industry, or how much Europe overregulates it.
SamWhited("we" being the U.S.)
pep.Depends on the regulations?
moparisthebestI'm in a different camp, I think all the regulations are bad
LNJhas joined
j.rhas left
j.rhas joined
rionhas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
lumihas left
pep.jonasw, you mentioned "encryption" when talking about server policies. Disk encryption? Protecting against the hosting provider? They have do have full control over the equipment, I guess paranoïa can go pretty far, how would you deploy that?
jonaswpep., I have no idea. I was desperately trying to think of a second thing :)
pep.hehe
Dave Cridlandhas left
andrey.gmoparisthebest, I'm wondering, how the world would look, if not only artificial regulations but also the natural one "only the fittest will survive" would disappear...
jonaswhah
alexishas left
alexishas joined
Valerianhas left
Valerianhas joined
moparisthebestandrey.g, not really sure what you mean, but I'm fine with natural regulations, the artificial ones are the problem
moparisthebestalso wouldn't call them 'natural regulations' but meh :)
andrey.gmoparisthebest, so we have different meanings of "all" regulations.
waqashas left
moparisthebestlike I said I wouldn't call like natural laws regulations
pep.jonasw, a bit more thinking tells me I can't be technically sure the hosting provider doesn't have access to my system. Best is to be the provider.. I guess that works for small deployments but that's about it
Ge0rGpep.: Intel SGX attempts to work around that, with limited success
Valerianhas left
Valerianhas joined
moparisthebestI thought intel SGX was completely broken
pep.Ge0rG, if it was my hardware in the DC that would be a bit easier to do encryption I guess?. That still doesn't prevent DC people from fiddling with it. Is that what SGX is for?
pep.If it's just a question of liability then I guess I don't need encryption at all, if a leak was caused by a hardware issues, or software issues at the virtualization level, I was told I could probably take it to the hosting provider.
pep.Otherwise, if it's mistrust towards the provider, first I'm in a bad position, second, if I still want to do something about it, I guess LUKS on my rootfs with dropbear-in-initramfs would prevent "casual snooping". But protects in no way against a bit more elaborated "attacks"
pep.(They have access to the virtualization software after all)
moparisthebestpep., yea that's how my dedicated server in germany is set up, but it's really just to protect against the 'hard drives re-used without wiping' attack
j.rhas joined
j.rhas joined
alexishas left
alexishas joined
LNJhas left
Kevhas left
jonaswMattJ, thank you very much
alexishas left
alexishas joined
tim@boese-ban.dehas left
waqashas joined
Dave Cridlandhas left
jonaswmoparisthebest, did you get around to set up your XEP-0368 test setup?
moparisthebestnope, also need to revive that thread and try to get some type of consensus
moparisthebestdino is still doing it wrong (imho), gajim just released 368 support but not sure if it's right or wrong :)
jjrhhas left
jjrhhas left
jjrhhas left
jonaswwhat is "wrong"?
moparisthebesttrying first xep-368 record, failing to connect, not trying any subsequent record
jonaswmmm
ZashDoes it work?
moparisthebestin my specific case, the error it encountered was not-valid-xml, it gets HTTP back
jonaswwe have a PR for ALPN for aioxmpp, but I’m hesitant to merge it without testing.
Kev'It compiles, ship it'.
jonaswKev, that’s a very very very bad idea for python code ;-)
KevOr in the case of Python, 'It commits, ship it'.
moparisthebestjonasw, I can give you an account on my server, which requires alpn for ipv4 as the first SRV record, for informal testing
jonaswmoparisthebest, that would already be a good start.
Zash'It turns into .pyc, ship it'
jonaswsend credentials to xmpp:jonas@wielicki.name. but don’t forget your privacy policy, I’m in the EU! ;-)
moparisthebestoh right, well just tell me you aren't in the EU and I'll send you one :)
jonaswI may or may not be in the EU.
jubalhhas joined
moparisthebestgood enough for me, will send you one in a few :)
j.rhas joined
danielhas left
j.rhas joined
jjrhhas left
Valerianhas left
Valerianhas joined
danielhas left
jjrhhas left
jjrhhas left
LNJhas joined
matlaghas joined
vanitasvitaehas left
waqashas left
waqashas joined
j.rhas joined
j.rhas joined
Dave Cridlandhas left
@Alacerhas left
@Alacerhas joined
ralphmhas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
jubalhhas left
jubalhhas joined
Dave Cridlandhas left
tuxhas left
jubalhhas left
danielhas left
ralphmhas joined
Dave Cridlandhas left
j.rhas joined
jubalhhas joined
jubalhhas left
SaltyBoneshas left
ralphmhas joined
marmistrzhas joined
marmistrzhas joined
Dave Cridlandhas left
SaltyBoneshas joined
Yagizahas left
lovetoxhas joined
Dave Cridlandhas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
Seve/SouLhas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
had-hochas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
j.rhas joined
Dave Cridlandhas left
marchas joined
SaltyBoneshas left
SaltyBoneshas joined
Steve Killehas left
Steve Killehas left
j.rhas joined
Steve Killehas joined
Dave Cridlandhas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas joined
Guushas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas joined
j.rhas joined
Dave Cridlandhas left
iiro.laihohas joined
Guushas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
Steve Killehas left
Valerianhas left
Valerianhas joined
Guushas left
jjrhgoogle talk's xmpp support doesn't support message carbons does it?
moparisthebestjjrh, I thought google completely turned off xmpp a couple months ago?
moparisthebestbut it never supported carbons anyway I think
Nekithas left
jjrhNah you can still connect with username @ gmail.com
jjrh(I just tested it today)
ZashFederation is gone tho
moparisthebestoh, so they just killed federation
Dave Cridlandhas left
LNJhas left
fippozash: they closed port 5269?
Zashfippo: Yup
ZashConnection refused on all SRV targets
lumihas joined
ZashIIRC they gave out not-authorized errors just before that
Dave Cridlandhas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
fipposo how long will it take them to remove the dns records...
ZashENOENT
Andrew Nenakhovmoparisthebest, > oh, so they just killed federation
Curse their sudden but inevitable betrayal!
moparisthebestwell it hasn't worked acceptably for years so, meh
LNJhas joined
winfriedhas joined
pep.Andrew Nenakhov, it's not sudden, they announced it at the beginning of 2017, for late June 2017 iirc
ZashHasn't it basically been outdated since 2006?
Valerianhas left
ralphmhas left
marmistrzhas left
Syndacehas left
Syndacehas joined
Dave Cridlandhas left
efrithas joined
LNJhas left
LNJhas joined
Dave Cridlandhas left
fippozash: well, someone said "the future is jingle" in 2011
fippobut these days the future is stun2, turn2 and rtp3
Andrew Nenakhovpep.,
> Andrew Nenakhov, it's not sudden, they announced it at the beginning of 2017, for late June 2017 iirc
It's actually dates much earlier. After Google announced Hangouts, they began gradually chopping off parts of xmpp functionality one by one in a period of over 2 years.
Dave Cridlandhas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
pep.Andrew Nenakhov: yeah but they officially announced it then
j.rhas joined
nycohas left
nycohas joined
Valerianhas joined
Guushas left
jubalhhas joined
Dave Cridlandhas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
nycohas left
marchas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
tim@boese-ban.dehas joined
@Alacerhas left
tim@boese-ban.dehas joined
tim@boese-ban.dehas left
lskdjfhas joined
jubalhhas left
marchas left
tim@boese-ban.dehas joined
j.rhas joined
Guushas left
Nekithas left
Nekithas joined
tim@boese-ban.dehas joined
Dave Cridlandhas left
j.rhas joined
Guushas left
waqashas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
Andrew NenakhovNot really. They announced that 'nothing changes for current users', but it did, gradually.
I'd even call it death by 1000 cuts, because it was clearly done so not to have another uproar like when they killed RSS Reader
Seve/SouLhas joined
Guushas left
tuxhas joined
Dave Cridlandhas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas left
vanitasvitaehas left
waqashas joined
Ge0rGMaybe the responsible project lead was just promoted to greener pastures and the project fell victim to bit rot?
Tobiashas joined
LNJhas left
j.rhas joined
Tobiashas joined
lskdjfhas joined
moparisthebestthat's the less cynical view
moparisthebestI think what really happened is they wanted to lock users into their walled garden :P
ralphmhas joined
ZashProbably a bit of both.
j.rhas joined
marmistrzhas left
Valerianhas left
Valerianhas joined
Dave Cridlandhas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas joined
tuxhas left
vanitasvitaehas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
jonaswhas left
Ge0rGmoparisthebest: yes, Google Management stated to lock in users some time around 2005. But I think there is still a large portion of CADT involved.
jonaswyou like that acronym, don’t you?
fippoge0rg: pah, getting rid of xmpp was clearly a technical decision because xmpp is based on http!
Ge0rGjonasw: it perfectly fits how Google does IM.
Dave Cridlandhas left
jonaswGe0rG, to me, it feels more like what I’m hearing peripherially (I don’t follow sports, at all) about german football. Team didn’t perform for three weeks? Replace all training personnel.✎
jonaswGe0rG, to me, it feels more like what I’m hearing peripherially (I don’t follow sports, at all) about german football. Team didn’t perform for three weeks? Replace all training personnel and start over! ✏
Ge0rGjonasw: CADT as well.
Ge0rGExcept maybe for the higher age of the involved functionaries
LNJhas joined
Zashdefine CADT?
goffihas left
fippozash: https://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html
fippozash: you might also want to read up on the kevlar-shitting spiders
ZashAh, yes
Zashwat
Dave Cridlandhas left
LNJhas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
Guushas left
vanitasvitaehas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas joined
Andrew Nenakhovhas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas joined
Andrew Nenakhovhas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas joined
Andrew Nenakhovhas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas joined
moparisthebestah hadn't seen CADT before but I like it
Andrew Nenakhovhas joined
Andrew Nenakhovhas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas joined
marmistrzhas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
jjrhI don't think what google turning off federation was to lock their users in - google doesn't have any issue with that.
Guushas left
jjrhI think they mostly just didn't want to support XMPP. Probably turning off federation made sense since they didn't need to deal with that UI aspect.
jjrhI'm guessing the majority of users didn't really use any of the federation stuff either.
jjrhI never understood the google news reader thing though - ALOT of people used it, there were tons of apps that took advantage of the fact all your RSS subscriptions were on a account just about every android user has.
Guushas left
Andrew NenakhovGoogle Reader was good, but current Feedly is better. Though RSS seems to be on decline too, so many websites opt for this stupid telegram channels thing, locking themselves into yet another proprietary service
jjrhThe thing that was nice about google reader was you had a dozen or so apps that connected to google reader so you had a good amount of choice.
SamWhitedooh, I haven't seen that one I don't think. I looked desperately for another feed reader that I actually liked after Google Reader shut down, but never found one and eventually gave up.
moparisthebesttt-rss
Alexhas left
moparisthebestgood web ui, and good android client
SamWhitedThat would require that I do work.
moparisthebeston the other hand, no one else can turn it off on a whim SamWhited :)
SamWhitedDon't care since I can export an OPML bundle
ZashI used liferea back in the day
SamWhitedAlso, even if I wanted to self host I'm not running PHP on my server.
jonaswgood choice.
marmistrzhas left
jjrhYeah there are a few other 'self hosted' choices https://github.com/Kickball/awesome-selfhosted#feed-readers
ZashNow I just randomly go to sites when I remember them. Or I hear about stuff because people link to things.
SamWhitedCan liferea sync to some sort of backend and stay in sync with a mobile version? That's basically my only requirement (that and I don't want to host whatever that backend is)
ZashNever got why it had to be a fkn web service
ZashSamWhited: I have no idea that was even a thing people did
waqasmumbles something about webscale
jjrhFeedly is probably what you want - it has a web reader and a android app
SamWhitedOh yes; I don't care if it's a desktop app or a webapp as long as I can read stuff on the bus and not have to figure out what I'd already read later.
SamWhitedFeedly does look like waht I was looking for at the time; I might give it a shot.
jjrhWhat drives me nuts is so many sites don't actually post the whole article in the RSS feed.
SamWhitedOoh yah, that always annoyed me
ZashReading on a bus seems like a recipie for feeling sick
jjrhit's like a 2 line sentence with a link to the website - and I mean the whole point is I want to read the article in the rss reader optionally offline.
SamWhitedDoesn't bother me unless it's one of the big commuter busses
moparisthebesttt-rss lets you write plugins to go to the website and grab the whole article anyway jjrh
moparisthebestbecause yes, that's obnoxious
jjrhThat's nice.
ZashIt's probably all just fake news anyways!
SamWhitedLiferea looks nice, but doesn't appear to sync to anything, sadly :(
marmistrzhas left
jjrhFake news is still news because people believe it's news and that's relevant
SamWhitedThat's why I only subscribe to The Onion.
jjrhI mostly read about Canadian politics and no cares about Canada enough about us to create a fake news conspiracy
j.rhas left
j.rhas joined
remkohas left
Alexhas joined
Andrew Nenakhov> it's like a 2 line sentence with a link to the website - and I mean the whole point is I want to read the article in the rss reader optionally offline.
Websites need eyeballs to show ads. So it's understandable, but is still a nuisance
lskdjfhas joined
Tobiashas joined
jerehas joined
jjrhIn some cases - in many others I think they just don't have a clue.
j.rhas left
j.rhas joined
jjrhbut unfortunately for them, google doesn't care about their ad dollars and scrapes their site with their 'newsstand' app or whatever it's called.
jjrhsome newspaper sites that have the 'you can read 2 articles for free then you gotta pay' thing are totally defeated by this.
Guushas left
iiro.laihohas left
Nekithas joined
tuxhas left
Nekithas left
Dave Cridlandhas left
moparisthebesthas left
blablahas joined
marchas joined
blablahas left
ralphmhas left
Valerianhas left
SamWhitedhas left
ralphmhas joined
blablahas joined
marchas left
Alexhas left
ralphmhas joined
ralphmhas left
la|r|mahas left
Ge0rGSome of the paywall sites also allow you to read stuff if you come from a social network referrer
jubalhhas joined
marchas joined
blablahas left
SaltyBonesdafuq xmpp? somebody just sent a message without a username to a muc ..by accident!