-
edhelas
can we add Firebase as one of the tools that is using XMPP ? https://firebase.google.com/docs/cloud-messaging/xmpp-server-ref
-
edhelas
on the main website
-
Alex
Memberbot is online for Q3-2018 elections
-
Link Mauve
Oh, Sonny didn’t reapply. :(
-
jonasw
there should be a way to abort voting :D
-
Seve/SouL
You can, at the very beginning :D
-
jonasw
yeah but…
-
Link Mauve
Damn, I didn’t submit my changes to memberbot yet!
- Seve/SouL pats jonasw. -Yes, I know.
-
jonasw
Link Mauve, at least you managed to submit your application this time :-)
-
Link Mauve
Yes!
-
Link Mauve
I surprised myself two days ago by simply doing it. :-°
-
Alex
maybe somebody should work on the application bot
-
Link Mauve
Would you accept a PR migrating it to python3 and slixmpp?
-
jonasw
Alex, how is the ordering of applicants during voting determined?
-
jonasw
ah, nevermind
-
jonasw
Link Mauve will fix it probably
-
jonasw
Link Mauve, make them sorted alphabetically
-
Link Mauve
No, it’s better to have them randomised.
-
jonasw
is it?
-
jonasw
it’s annoying
-
Link Mauve
Yes.
-
Alex
jonasw: getting randomized
-
jonasw
but alas, there’s a rationale for that apparently
-
jonasw
I sorted the applicants on the wiki page tohugh, I hope that’s okay
-
jonasw
makes it easier to find the one I want to look at
-
Link Mauve
It’s in order to prevent anyone from being favourised by being first or last in the list.
-
Alex
this was changed ages ago on requests for board and council meetings, where you have less votes than applicants, to give t hem all the same chance
-
Link Mauve
I’d expect like in most similar voting processes, voters are more attentive at first, and more tired at the end.
-
Link Mauve
tired/bored.
-
jonasw
makes sense
-
Alex
but I agree, for teh quarterly votes for applicants there should be no need to randomize
-
Link Mauve
For the reason I just gave, I think it’s better to keep that.
-
jonasw
hm, maybe especially there?
-
Alex
ya
-
jonasw
voted \o/
-
Alex
(Y)
-
mathieui
yeah, congratulations Link Mauve for managing to submit your application on time
-
Kev
I'm not sure it's even true that for member votes you don't need to randomise.
-
Link Mauve
Yes, as I explained above.
-
Lance
Unless Alex has his own fork, here's the source for the bot if you want to improve it: https://github.com/legastero/memberbot
-
Lance
Should probably fork it anyway into the xsf org
-
Link Mauve
Yup, that’s what I built on.
-
Link Mauve
And here are my changes: https://github.com/linkmauve/memberbot
-
Lance
I quite literally made the new bot because I lost a Council bid by a few votes; I'm sure because I was #6 on the list :p
-
Link Mauve
Don’t pull the Redis one, it was just for testing because I didn’t want to have to setup Redis.
-
Link Mauve
Lance, :D
-
Seve
I haven't voted yet
-
Seve
Does the bot send you the applicants in alphabetical order?
-
jonasw
no
-
jonasw
in shuffled order
-
Seve
Or why did you modify the wiki, then?
-
jonasw
you can at least quickly find a name if a list is sorted alphabetically
-
Seve
Or was any reasoning behind the order, before?
-
jonasw
not that I knew
-
jonasw
(also, when I did the sorting, I didn’t know that the bot wasn’t offering me names in alphabetical order because the first name asked for was the first one by alphabetical order :))
-
Seve
I was just curious :D
-
pep.
memberbot is not up? Or not in my contacts anymore?
-
pep.
Ah, works now
-
js
Memberbot hasn't been working for me the last 2 iterations :/
-
js
I see it only - it just never responds. Already sent a mail to Alexander, nothing :/