XSF Discussion - 2018-11-21

(Moving from council@) “17:19:29 jonas’> we do have the luck to have a huge stash of disco#info replies from both servers and (a bit outdated) clients if you want to make a survey”, where can I find that? I also have the ones collected by poezio, but at least one third doesn’t validate, most likely because poezio forgot to put the @xml:lang in it…

Link Mauve, https://github.com/xnyhps/capsdb/

Oh, nice.

aioxmpp has native support for reading and writing that format ;-)

I guess I’ll merge mine into it.

sounds like a plan

jonas’, none of them have an @xml:lang, do they still validate correctly?

at least one does have one (a grep on it shows it)

Should I contribute only the ones from poezio which do validate, then?

what this could be used nicely is to test your hash algo

Or try to guess the @xml:lang?

Link Mauve, I am confused, why guess it?

jonas’, because we apparently didn’t store it.

Link Mauve, or it wasn’t present

I'm not sure if capsdb would give a realistic picture of the disco#info feature in disco#info replies situation: It appears to contain mostly non-node query results from clients, wheras, for example, ejabberd does not include it in its MUC component, and, while Smack would include the feature in non-node queries, it does not enforce that it is included in disco#info queries against nodes

flow, for server-side things, I’d fire a search using the muclumbus crawler

+1

https://twitter.com/neustradamus/status/1065328474922061825