-
jonas’
is there anything wrong with sending further presence to a MUC after the initial join presence and before having received a join reply?
-
Ge0rG
jonas’: apart from not knowing if the MUC exists, no
-
jonas’
cause I don’t want to add extra logic to prevent presence updates from being sent to the MUC before the join is complete
-
jonas’
now that aioxmpp’s MUC will get the ability to distribute presence updates
-
Kev
Nope, just keep sending.
-
Kev
Although if you're kicked or whatever it's somewhat antisocial to autojoin.
-
jonas’
if we just had deleted GC1.0 ... :)
-
rion
Kev: Neustradamus wants you to change your email in Psi sources. What do you think? :)
-
Kev
The one in the README's right isn't it?
-
jonas’
Kev, how about LC-ing https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0300.html, by the way?
-
rion
Kev: yep
-
Kev
jonas’: Not sure it provides much value, but could do.
-
Kev
rion: do you know where else my address is? I'd be more inclined to remove duplication than anything else.
-
jonas’
'390 depends on it, and I think having re-usable semantics is often a good thing.
-
jonas’
(see the mess we got in with Jingle File Transfer and SHIM)
-
rion
Kev: I guess this one too ./src/aboutdlg.cpp: "kismith@psi-im.org"
-
jonas’
s/semantics/syntax/ in this case maybe
-
Kev
Sorry, I don't mean 300 provides value, I meant moving to Draft wouldn't, but I could be wrong - just out of bed).
-
Kev
jonas’: Yeah, I'm wrong, it would provide value.
-
jonas’
I wonder if it should be split into a Standards Track part which describes the protocol and an Informational part which describes the set of supported hash functions?
-
jonas’
because the protocol can easily be put in Final state right now
-
Kev
rion: I'd probably just remove my address from the About and leave my name there. Want me to PR?
-
jonas’
the set of hash functions possibly never
-
Kev
jonas’: Right.
-
jonas’
so… LC it and bring this up during the LC, see what folks think?
-
rion
Kev: or just commit
-
Kev
jonas’: Or split first.
-
Kev
rion: Ok, ta.
-
jonas’
I’ll bring the proposal of the split up on the list then
-
Kev
👍
-
Kev
rion: Done. That was not a repo I was expecting to push to any time soon :)
-
rion
your commits are always welcome :-)
-
Kev
Thanks.
-
jonas’
Ge0rG, can you please review the changes to XEP-0363 soon so that I know where to put it? kthx
-
Ge0rG
jonas’: do we have a working delta renderer somewhere?
-
Ge0rG
jonas’: editorial change in 0363: s/CORS-Header/CORS header/
-
Ge0rG
jonas’: also my point from https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2018-July/035208.html wasn't addressed at all. I'll think some more about what my conditional vote means now that the condition wasn't met.