-
jonas’
> The legacy [Group Chat 1.0] protocol has not been in active use for more than ten > years, and servers are fading out support for it because its > presence causes issues. I feel like I missed a chance when writing this.✎ -
jonas’
> The legacy [Group Chat 1.0] protocol has not been in active use for more than ten > years, and servers are fading out support for it because its > presence causes issues. I feel like I missed a chance when I wrote this. ✏
-
MattJ
:)
-
Andrew Nenakhov
Btw does anyone have this [Group Chat 1.0] protocol anywhere? Was searching hard for it and didn't find
-
jonas’
the original GC 1.0?
-
Andrew Nenakhov
Only mentions of it in XEP 0045
-
Andrew Nenakhov
jonas’, yes
-
jonas’
I think somebody tried to find it when the removal of GC 1.0 was discussed
-
jonas’
but I’m not sure whether it has been found
-
Andrew Nenakhov
Funny. No wonder this protocol fell out of use
-
Andrew Nenakhov
You'll have to do the same to MUC.
-
MattJ
Well it's not https://matthewwild.co.uk/uploads/conferencing.html
-
Andrew Nenakhov
MattJ, thanks!
-
MattJ
No, that seems to be an alternative proposal (that became or was replaced by XEP-0045)
-
MattJ
Ah, it's documented here: https://matthewwild.co.uk/uploads/protocol.html
-
MattJ
(search for jabber:iq:conference )
-
MattJ
It's... very short
-
Ge0rG
jonas’ [16:17]: > I think somebody tried to find it when the removal of GC 1.0 was discussed I wanted to get a council vote to remove it last year, but unfortunately all I got was "make a PR and don't dare making _it_ worse", for undefined "it" and "worse".
-
Ge0rG
And then I started removing the cruft from 0045 and it turned out harder than I thought initially, and then - EBUSY