XSF Discussion - 2019-04-04


  1. ralphm

    Grids FTW

  2. nyco

    aaaaand boom!

  3. Seve

    o/

  4. nyco

    \o

  5. Guus

    \o/

  6. nyco

    quorum

  7. Guus

    ralphm MattJ ?

  8. Guus wanders around, finds a gavel, and rings it

  9. Guus

    bangs it?

  10. nyco

    oh hey

  11. Guus

    what does one do to gavels?

  12. nyco

    tap?

  13. nyco

    caress maybe

  14. Guus

    1. Roll call, agenda

  15. Guus

    we've established that there's three of us here

  16. Guus

    Agenda driven by Trello, as usual

  17. Guus

    does anyone want to discuss anything that's not already in Trello?

  18. nyco

    42

  19. Guus

    I suggest holding of much of the discussion around sponsoring until we have a full board.

  20. Ge0rG

    A Tedd has created badges.

  21. MattJ

    Here

  22. Guus

    Ge0rG is that to be discussed?

  23. Guus

    hey Matt!

  24. Guus

    Ge0rG is that to be discussed by board?

  25. Guus

    2. Confirm minute taker / have an awkward moment of silence

  26. Seve

    Haha

  27. Guus

    Would someone be so kind as to do the minutes?

  28. Ge0rG

    Guus: I'm not sure. Board called out for volunteers, and we have two strawman badge proposals plus a yet unanswered jobs call

  29. Seve

    Where are the proposals?

  30. Guus

    3. Badges everywhere

  31. Ge0rG

    Seve: mine is under https://op-co.de/tmp/xmpp-compliance-badges/ - theTedd made one at https://bitbucket.org/mrtedd/compliance-badges/src

  32. Seve

    I thought you were working together, so they are different proposals then? Are those finished?

  33. nyco

    both are cool, well done, thx

  34. Ge0rG

    Seve: Tedd's proposal is an interactive generator, mine is a shell script that hammers badges.io

  35. Ge0rG

    neither is quite there yet

  36. Guus

    Thanks to both of you for putting in the effort.

  37. Guus

    I'm unsure who rubber-stamps a particular set.

  38. Guus

    board? council? the XEP author?

  39. MattJ

    Since we decided the XSF should have ownership, I would assume it's up to the board to ultimately decide

  40. Kev

    Unless Board delegates.

  41. MattJ

    Not that I'm particularly fussy

  42. Ge0rG

    I'm open for feedback and discussion as well

  43. Guus

    so, board. works for me.

  44. Guus

    I'm not sure if I can make an objective choice, though. I'd love for member feedback / cooperation

  45. Seve

    Ge0rG, if I have to decide, I would prefer to wait a bit until both are done to be able to decide. Although I also would like to give some time for the job as well (I'm very happy both of you put work on this, but I would also leave the door open for the open source design community, since the job was posted after)

  46. Ge0rG

    there is also another strawman badge at https://op-co.de/tmp/core-client-2019.svg

  47. Guus

    Ge0rG, were you and Tedd's work in reaction of each-other, somehow?

  48. moparisthebest

    hmm can't read that font at all

  49. Guus

    (why do we have two sets? Is one supposed to address something found in the other?)

  50. Ge0rG

    Guus: I don't think so.

  51. Ge0rG

    moparisthebest: yes, the badges.io format is using 14px as baseline height, for $reasons

  52. moparisthebest

    wonder if each "class" like "Core Mobile IM Client" should just have a short-hand version?

  53. Guus

    let's not have that discussion now

  54. moparisthebest

    well I can read XMPP just fine, just not the other bit

  55. Guus

    Can we a) finish both versions, b) put a choice to the members?

  56. Ge0rG

    Guus: not if we want to await a proper designer to do the job

  57. Guus

    What if we wait for another week, for a designer to pop up based on that jobposting that you did

  58. Ge0rG

    +1

  59. Guus

    then put this to members: version a, version b, or neither and find another designer

  60. Guus

    fwiw, I'm happy with both proposals

  61. Guus

    board: is the above acceptable to you?

  62. MattJ

    +1

  63. Guus

    nyco, seve?

  64. nyco

    ok

  65. Seve

    Just thinking

  66. Ge0rG

    regarding refinement of the existing ones, I'd like to hear opinions on the exact strings to use, maybe after Meeting?

  67. nyco

    I agree we should make the community participate

  68. Guus

    yes, kindly take that out of the meeting, Ge0rG

  69. Guus

    Seve - you were thinking?

  70. Seve

    Let's move forward, I just feel the badges can be "too much". Ge0rG's proposal, I wonder if that is the final verison, or the badge number is going to be lowered.

  71. Seve

    I would like to simplify it a bit

  72. Seve

    but let's wait for a week

  73. Seve

    and then choose between what we have

  74. Guus

    ok

  75. Guus

    4. commitments

  76. Guus

    4.1 Clarify what happens when a typo (or equivalent) is fixed in a Deferred XEP

  77. Guus

    This is basically a placeholder for jonas’ I think

  78. MattJ

    Yes

  79. Guus

    (giving him time to point out that it's already done in case I missed it)

  80. Ge0rG

    IIRC the suggestion was for Editor to make the change without undeferring the XEP

  81. MattJ

    Yeah, I think jonas’ offered to wordsmith some text for XEP-0001 iirc

  82. Guus

    we agreed with wording, it's a matter of applying the change to the XEP. Unsure if this needs to be on our agenda any longer, but its a good place to track that we don't forget about it.

  83. Guus

    lets move on

  84. Guus

    4.2 Discuss server setup with iteam

  85. Guus

    as Ralph is not here, I don't think we have anything to discuss regarding this.

  86. Guus

    4.3 Tigase would like to use the XMPP logo

  87. Kev

    I thought XEP1 already said that a change to z in x.y.z wasn't a change to undefer.

  88. Kev

    (But you've moved on)

  89. Guus

    Ralph left a message saying that he asked Peter. No updates on that yet.

  90. jonas’

    Guus, I don’t think we agreed with wording, at least not to my knowledge.

  91. Guus

    Nyco, did you let Tigase know that they could use the XMPP logo, and that we'll update them under what exact conditions, as we agreed last week?

  92. jonas’

    (board meetings are typically during my commute home, sorry for the delay)

  93. Kev

    Isn't the logo CC, same as the rest of the website anyway?

  94. Guus

    jonas’ no worries. This remark is on the Trello card: "In today's board meeting, Board agrees wiath Jonas' suggested change, and ask the Editor to draft a proposal for the change in XEP-0001."

  95. Guus

    Kev that's what the general assumption is, but no-one is sure.

  96. nyco

    Guus yes

  97. Guus

    Last week, we discussed that it's fine for Tigase to use the logo (and we'd let them know), but that at the same time we should figure out exactly what the licensing model was.

  98. Guus

    thanks nyco

  99. Guus

    jonas’ are you happy for us to leave the XEP-0001 clarification with you?

  100. jonas’

    Guus, more or less

  101. jonas’

    I’ll see that I get to it, for real, during the next week

  102. Guus

    thanks

  103. Guus

    5. Poll membership for feedback on the creation of an XMPP-related job board

  104. Guus

    I think we've had all feedback that we're going to get, unless we re-ask.

  105. Guus

    All that I have seen was moderately positive towards having such a job board in one way or another

  106. MattJ

    and it was all positive iirc

  107. Guus

    have you had more feedback, Seve ?

  108. Seve

    We got some feedback, all positive, so that depends if we want to try to push this again and ask for more feedback or we are all good with what he have.

  109. Guus

    I suggest that we follow up with a more concrete proposal

  110. Seve

    Good

  111. Ge0rG

    have a dedicated page on the website, and a PR process to add jobs there?

  112. Guus

    Would you be willing to establish such a proposal, Seve ?

  113. Ge0rG

    a clean template with data similar to clients.json, sorted alphabetically by company name

  114. Seve

    Guus, yes sure. I'm not a fan of PR, I would like to see if we can find another way for that, before sticking to PR.

  115. Seve

    I would like more people submit jobs, not technical people

  116. Seve

    not only*

  117. Guus

    Ok, let's take that out of this meeting too 🙂

  118. Seve

    Agree

  119. Guus

    6. AOB?

  120. Guus

    (I have no)

  121. Seve

    Not from me

  122. nyco

    I'm good

  123. MattJ

    None here

  124. Guus

    7. Date of next meeting

  125. Guus

    +1W, unless someone strongly objects.

  126. nyco

    +1, I strongly agree

  127. Seve

    +1

  128. Guus

    8. bow and applause.

  129. Seve claps

  130. Guus makes a gavel noise

  131. MattJ

    Thanks!

  132. Guus

    Thanks guys!

  133. Seve

    Cool, thank you all!

  134. nyco

    thx

  135. Ge0rG

    Yay!

  136. Ge0rG

    So now back to the badge wording.

  137. Ge0rG

    I'd like to have the covered suite in the left and the year in the right, but then there is no "XMPP"

  138. Ge0rG

    Tedd has "XMPP:2019" in the left and the specific suite combo in the right, which also has some merit

  139. Guus

    Ge0rG I don't think having 'xmpp' in there is a must, as the context in which the badge is used probably implies the reference anyways

  140. Guus

    I have nothing against including 'xmpp' either, though.

  141. Guus

    I have a personal, subjective preference, but that's not based on anything more than what I find visually appealing.

  142. Ge0rG

    I want to hear that

  143. Guus

    I'd be happy with both

  144. Guus

    I personally dislike the "+" character that Tedd included.

  145. Guus

    I like yours slightly more

  146. Zash

    XMPP Plus

  147. Ge0rG

    I'd prefer a different character because of "IM+" already being a thing.

  148. Ge0rG

    mine is lacking the flexibility of core-IM combined with advanced-mobile

  149. Guus

    so, have two badges?

  150. Ge0rG

    but maybe we only need the "advanced" prefix if all of the advanced things match

  151. Guus

    I'm not sure if me discussing this more would have any benefit, to be honest.

  152. Ge0rG

    Guus: if we are going to combine badges, we can significantly reduce the badge number

  153. Guus

    I'd put this to the people that are intended to use the badges.

  154. Guus

    as I said, I'd be happy to use either set.

  155. jonas’

    .

  156. jonas’

    I included some feedback on the new CSS from here and the list as well as implemented a feature I wanted to have myself: https://sotecware.net/files/noindex/xeptest/xep-0390.html

  157. Zash

    !

  158. jonas’

    ((hopefully) fixed contrast of link font, added margins on small screens, and a megafancy toc thing on large screens)

  159. Zash

    Very nice

  160. Guus

    https://igniterealtime.org:443/httpfileupload/d2654a25-3bfb-4684-bfc3-36f9218bc4d6/screenshot_2.png

  161. jonas’

    yeah, the revision list is known-bad

  162. Guus

    kk

  163. Guus

    margin on mobile is now ok!

  164. jonas’

    thanks for testing! :)

  165. jonas’

    I’ll now go and fix that revision list mess

  166. Ge0rG

    margin in the dual-pane is a bit thin

  167. jonas’

    Ge0rG, between the panes, or on the leftmost edge?

  168. Ge0rG

    it should probably be 25% - 75% and not 50-50

  169. Ge0rG

    jonas’: margin in the right pane

  170. jonas’

    Ge0rG, 25%-75% w.r.t. to what?

  171. Ge0rG

    jonas’: sorry, mixing two things now.

  172. Ge0rG

    jonas’: the panes should be split 25/75 and not 50/50

  173. jonas’

    they are not split 50/50

  174. Ge0rG

    and the right pane doesn't have any meaningful margins

  175. jonas’

    never, actually, what’s your screen size?

  176. jonas’

    this must be some corner case

  177. jonas’

    like always when you report stuff

  178. Ge0rG

    1920x1080

  179. jonas’

    the splitting triggers at 75em screen width, and the leftmost pane starts out at 15em width, leaving the rest to the right pane

  180. jonas’

    so it’s actually 25/75 by default

  181. Ge0rG

    when I shrink the window below ~1650, the left pane disappears completely

  182. jonas’

    that’s probably intended

  183. jonas’

    Ge0rG, can you provide a screenshot?

  184. jonas’

    plus the computed width of the body element, if possible?

  185. jonas’

    s/body/html/

  186. wurstsalat

    jonas’, this looks nice indeed! I wonder if it would be possible (without js) to highlight the chapter in the sidebar depending on where I read on the page?

  187. jonas’

    wurstsalat, I don’t think that’s possible without JS

  188. wurstsalat

    ok!

  189. Ge0rG

    https://op-co.de/tmp/panes-50-50.png

  190. Ge0rG

    jonas’: ^

  191. jonas’

    I did something like that a few weeks back and was unable to find a non-JS solution IIRC

  192. jonas’

    Ge0rG, watcopter

  193. jonas’ fires up chromium

  194. Zash

    Web.

  195. Ge0rG

    jonas’: computed width = 1905px

  196. jonas’

    now I get it, thanks

  197. jonas’

    I see what’s going on

  198. Ge0rG

    phew.

  199. jonas’

    well, not actually

  200. jonas’

    nope, doesn’t make sense

  201. Ge0rG

    I'm not going to give you remote-debugging on my chromium jewels :D

  202. jonas’

    damnit

  203. jonas’

    https://sotecware.net/images/dont-puush-me/A50KqvthxiViQpe96jbw1PMxJNCgPUWNphvVx6-j3cQ.png

  204. jonas’

    cannotreproduce

  205. jonas’

    font size?

  206. Neustradamus

    Any news for XEP diff tool?

  207. jonas’

    Neustradamus, no

  208. Ge0rG

    jonas’: custom->22

  209. Neustradamus

    jonas’: :'(

  210. Ge0rG

    (in the chrome prefs)

  211. jonas’

    Neustradamus, go ahead and work on it ;)

  212. Ge0rG

    I've got bad eyes. No idea how anybody can read 10pt on a 15" full-hd screen.

  213. jonas’

    Ge0rG, that triggers it! thanks

  214. jonas’

    Ge0rG, the typical fix for *that* is /usr/bin/chromium --force-device-scale-factor=1.5 or something

  215. jonas’

    which also fixes all other sizes (not only font size)

  216. Ge0rG

    jonas’: yay for blurry icons everywhere.

  217. jonas’

    only if the screen is not dense enough ;)

  218. jonas’

    I don’t get how that can even happen

  219. Ge0rG

    also yay for having to dig into the fugly mess that is chrome cmdline parameters

  220. jonas’

    ah!

  221. Neustradamus

    I have not rights to do it like: - The year change for a newsletter (2018->2019) - XEP proposal redirections -> XEP - ...

  222. jonas’

    Neustradamus, you have

  223. jonas’

    make a PR against the repository

  224. jonas’

    everybody can do that

  225. Ge0rG

    jonas’: don't tell Neustradamus to open PRs.

  226. jonas’

    Ge0rG, I find PRs marginally more useful than issues without a description about what’s going on

  227. Neustradamus

    Ge0rG: https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/issues/created_by/Neustradamus I have not access to the webserver: https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/issues/421

  228. jonas’

    Neustradamus, it’s all in dockerfiles nowadays

  229. jonas’

    I don’t know in *which* dockerfiles, though

  230. Ge0rG

    onions everywhere.

  231. Neustradamus

    About XEP diff tool, all are here no? https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/issues/412

  232. pep.

    Ge0rG, onions? whales?

  233. pep.

    Neustradamus, go ahead and work on it?

  234. jonas’

    Ge0rG, I think what’s happening is that: - the @media query to determine the split stuff is based on your browser font size - everything else is not, for whatever reason. at least changing the font size in chromium does not affect the xep at all

  235. jonas’

    which is weird, because I expected yaml to do this right Ovo

  236. jonas’

    which is weird, because I expected yaml to do this right O_o

  237. Zash

    jonas’: I think redirects are in the top level nginx config actually

  238. jonas’

    Zash, so the xmpp.org dockerfile?

  239. pep.

    There's a nginx in front of that no?

  240. Ge0rG

    pep.: maybe Ogers?

  241. Zash

    There's an nginx in front of it all

  242. jonas’

    Ge0rG, can you confirm that changing the chromium font size does not affect the XEP?

  243. Ge0rG

    jonas’: confirmed

  244. jonas’

    derp

  245. jonas’

    the first time I’m disappointed in yaml.de

  246. jonas’

    I wonder what the rationale is for that

  247. jonas’

    feels pretty non-accessible to me

  248. Ge0rG

    annoying users with bad eyes.

  249. Ge0rG

    like badges.io

  250. jonas’

    yaml wins awards for accessibility

  251. jonas’

    so I doubt that’s the point ;)

  252. Ge0rG

    you can't make it accessible for *everyone*

  253. jonas’

    ah, I missed a file

  254. jonas’

    that explains it to a certain extent

  255. Neustradamus

    All xmpp.org servers will be updated/upgraded to the new Debian normally (soon), the World will be better ^^

  256. jonas’

    err

  257. jonas’

    derp

  258. jonas’

    *somebody* set font-size: 12pt in the body

  259. jonas’

    that was probably me

  260. jonas’

    explains all the mess

  261. jonas’

    sorry

  262. jonas’

    Ge0rG, reload please

  263. Ge0rG

    jonas’: more 30-70 now

  264. jonas’

    acceptable?

  265. Ge0rG

    also the font size grew a bit

  266. Ge0rG

    jonas’: I still think we can move the vertical bar more to the left. Also make it movable manually

  267. jonas’

    the latter isn’t possible without massive JS invasion

  268. Zash

    frames

  269. Ge0rG

    iframes!

  270. fire

    Welcome guys, ok?

  271. jonas’

    rion

  272. fire

    I am sorry

  273. Ge0rG

    fire: здесь только дискуссии протокола xmpp

  274. fire

    Don't stop me pleace

  275. fire

    Ge0rG, hey man

  276. Ge0rG

    fire: xmpp:yaxim-ru@chat.yax.im?join ;)

  277. Ge0rG

    jonas’: how can I search MUCs by language? :>

  278. jonas’

    not

  279. Ge0rG not searches.

  280. Ge0rG

    doesn't work.

  281. fire

    Bot translater in jabber for me, ok?

  282. fire

    Ge0rG, Bot translater in jabber for me, ok?

  283. Ge0rG

    fire: есть русские каналы. Здесь просто не правильное место для болтовни

  284. fire

    Ge0rG, what is true?

  285. fire

    Ge0rG, talk me pleace

  286. Ge0rG

    jonas’: sorry, that doesn't work.

  287. jonas’

    :(

  288. fire

    Ge0rG, casual english language room for me, ok?

  289. jonas’

    fire, xmpp:offtopic@chat.disroot.org?join

  290. fire

    jonas’, not work

  291. jonas’

    Ge0rG, ^ can you help with that?

  292. fire

    jonas’, can i help for you?

  293. Ge0rG

    jonas’: I don't see how

  294. fire

    Why

  295. jonas’

    Ge0rG, unrelated, how’s this splitting-wise? https://sotecware.net/files/noindex/xeptest/xep-0390.html#appendix-revs

  296. Ge0rG

    jonas’: just perfect

  297. jonas’

    :)

  298. Ge0rG

    jonas’: now have some JS that highlights the current position in the TOC

  299. jonas’

    later, if ever

  300. jonas’

    I’m not in the mood to touch JS just yet

  301. Ge0rG

    I’m not in the mood to touch JS. EVER.

  302. fire

    jonas’, wow, many read

  303. jonas’

    I’m still trying to figure out a way to get the XEP title or at least number above the TOC without actually having it in the HTML

  304. Ge0rG

    jonas’: maybe you should ask MattJ for help.

  305. jonas’

    Ge0rG, is MattJ a CSS wizard?

  306. Ge0rG

    jonas’: no, MattJ is an admin of this MUC :P

  307. jonas’

    ah

  308. jonas’

    different issue, I see

  309. fire

    I don't know xmpp standards

  310. Zash

    jonas’: How far into ugly CSS hackery are you prepared to to go?

  311. jonas’

    Zash, very

  312. Zash

    jonas’: Try `nav > h2:before { content: "HELLO" }` or someting

  313. fire

    Zash, hello dear friend

  314. jonas’

    Zash, yeah, I’m at that point now

  315. jonas’

    I can’t make that part display: block t hough

  316. Zash

    And is there no existing js that can do the TOC fiddlery?

  317. jonas’

    oh I can, nevermind

  318. fire

    Zash, english casual room for me, ok?

  319. Zash

    fire: This is not the place.

  320. fire

    Zash, where are from this place?

  321. Zash

    fire: I don't understand.

  322. fire

    Zash, jid

  323. Zash

    I don't know

  324. Zash

    I'm here for XMPP and XMPP accessories.

  325. fire

    Zash, and a jid jabber translater eng => rus, rus => eng, ok?

  326. Zash

    Sorry, I don't understand what you mean.

  327. fire

    Zash, bot translater for jabber

  328. Zash

    I don't know anything about that.

  329. fire

    Zash, you lie for me?

  330. Guus

    When this happens in the Ignite Realtime chatrooms, we usually agree that it must be Dave, trolling.

  331. pep.

    Smart

  332. jonas’

    https://sotecware.net/files/noindex/xeptest/xep-0390.html now all I wish is that there was a way to make the XMPP logo / xep number clickable and have it jump to the top of the page or something useful like that

  333. fire

    Guus, I am not Dave, I am fire

  334. jonas’

    but I don’t think that’s possible without JS (and even then...)

  335. pep.

    jonas’, not possible without JS? Even if you have an anchor at the top?

  336. jonas’

    pep., the problem is the "make it clickable" part

  337. jonas’

    the logo + xep number don’t exist in the HTML

  338. jonas’

    it’s pure CSS

  339. Zash

    :before pseudo element hackery

  340. pep.

    I see

  341. jonas’

    (and there is an accessibility reason why I want to do it that way)

  342. pep.

    Make the whole h2 block clickable? :-°

  343. jonas’

    hm

  344. Zash

    Thing I did was to have the ToC at the bottom

  345. jonas’

    that might not even be the worst idea

  346. jonas’

    pep., works good enough :)

  347. pep.

    yeah, good enough :)

  348. Ge0rG

    https://upload.yax.im/upload/Rwyzg0onuaq6pDvo/Screenshot_20190404-181425_Firefox.jpg

  349. pep.

    hmm, is it me or the title is being cropped a bit

  350. jonas’

    pep., screenshot

  351. Ge0rG

    jonas’: the indentation is a bit much on mobile Firefox

  352. jonas’

    Ge0rG, that XEP is a bit too much on mobile

  353. jonas’

    for portrait mode anyways

  354. jonas’

    but I intended to reduce the ol/ul indent a bit on mobile, yes

  355. jonas’

    (pun not indented)

  356. fire

    No understand

  357. Ge0rG

    jonas’: can you add an indentation to the second and following lines of line broken titles?

  358. jonas’

    Ge0rG, maybe

  359. pep.

    jonas’, ugh, let me update first (67.0a1 (2019-02-04)). https://ppjet.bouah.net/xep-css.png this is what I see

  360. Ge0rG

    https://upload.yax.im/upload/nfEVxFc9bIzB8GPE/Screenshot_20190404-181645_Firefox.jpg

  361. jonas’

    pep., I’m on 65.0.1, so ;P

  362. fire

    This room for programmist's?

  363. pep.

    68.0a1 is out already :)

  364. jonas’

    pep., stable <3

  365. pep.

    I had another fk up with debian stable today, please don't :x

  366. fire

    Pep enjoy nick name

  367. Ge0rG

    jonas’: the hex dump isn't using a fixed width font

  368. pep.

    jonas’, anyway same result on 68

  369. jonas’

    pep., hm, cannot reproduce here.

  370. jonas’

    but I should add a margin to the top anyways

  371. Zash

    jonas’: Your CSS almost worked with the xep->markdown->html hack I have

  372. pep.

    maybe a mix of line-height being small and big font size

  373. fire

    I want understand english language

  374. pep.

    fire, here is not the place

  375. pep.

    We linked you a few other rooms to join

  376. jonas’

    Ge0rG, https://sotecware.net/images/dont-puush-me/i1_HyFdvZw8e243a6YZzaq5sW6pnt0ZsPLprXz1Yy88.png

  377. jonas’

    like this?

  378. jonas’

    Ge0rG, hexdump uses monospace font here, does it work for you with other examples?

  379. Ge0rG

    jonas’: like that, yes

  380. jonas’

    Ge0rG, mind that I can’t control the indent in a way which makes it consistent with the length of the leading number, unfortunately

  381. fire

    pep., good

  382. fire

    pep., where this?

  383. Ge0rG

    jonas’: yes, I was assuming that.

  384. jonas’

    Ge0rG, reload

  385. jonas’

    pep., reload

  386. Ge0rG

    jonas’: neither examples nor other pre boxes are mono space on m mobile Firefox

  387. jonas’

    Ge0rG, ah, that I can work with!

  388. jonas’

    Ge0rG, reload

  389. pep.

    yeah better

  390. Ge0rG

    jonas’: thanks, fixed now

  391. fire

    pep., other rooms have adres?

  392. pep.

    jonas’, how hard is it to have the anchor leave a tiny bit of space before each section?

  393. pep.

    margin-top(?)

  394. jonas’

    pep., when jumping to it you mean?

  395. jonas’

    it’s possible with a fun insane trick

  396. pep.

    yeah

  397. Zash

    :target ?

  398. pep.

    fire, xmpp:yaxim-ru@chat.yax.im?join xmpp:offtopic@chat.disroot.org?join

  399. jonas’

    Zash, +margin, yes

  400. fire

    pep., thank you

  401. jonas’

    pep., hm, doesn’t really do the trick, thinking about it

  402. fire

    I am go to exit

  403. pep.

    Have I resolved this issue?

  404. pep.

    jonas’, fine I can deal with this :p

  405. jonas’

    ah, it’s easy

  406. jonas’

    pep., no, we all did that same thing before

  407. pep.

    We'll see tomorrow

  408. jonas’

    pep., reload

  409. pep.

    wooo

  410. Zash

    https://cerdale.zash.se/upload/rLl5vbJj-JwDXxLG/Screenshot_2019-04-04_18-30-15.png

  411. Zash

    Hmm

  412. jonas’

    weirdest piece of CSS I’ve ever seen: h2:target::before, h3:target::before, h4:target::before, h5:target::before, h6:target::before { content: ""; display: block; height: 1.5rem; margin-top: -1.5rem; }

  413. Zash

    madness

  414. jonas’

    Zash, what did you do!!k

  415. Zash

    jonas’: xep-to-markdown rendered with pandoc to html with your css (slightly tweaked)

  416. jonas’

    :D

  417. Zash

    The default pandoc template has #TOC instead of #toc and CSS is case sensitive??

  418. jonas’

    Ge0rG, I now fixed your landing page example in XEP-0379

  419. jonas’

    Ge0rG, https://sotecware.net/files/noindex/xeptest/xep-0379.html#link_transmission

  420. pep.

    jonas’, some criticism from colleagues (tech people), they don't really like the orange, in the index, "too close to red and that has a different meaning", they also don't really like the index altogether, I don't know how I feel about it, I definitely see the benefits for navigation. and they also preferred stuff properly separated in the metadata at the top in the previous version of the page

  421. jonas’

    meh, the :target hack breaks the line wrapping thing

  422. jonas’

    pep., can you expand on the metadata-at-the-top part please?

  423. jonas’

    I’m not sold on the colours, obviously

  424. jonas’

    I’m not going to take their opinion on the index, it’s awesome

  425. jonas’

    ;)

  426. Neustradamus

    Kev: I sent you a private message, thanks in advance.

  427. pep.

    jonas’, the index itself yeah I'd agree. Maybe colors can be slightly tweaked(?)

  428. jonas’

    pep., reload

  429. Zash

    :D

  430. jonas’

    it’s also less in conflict with the XMPP-blue at the top

  431. pep.

    jonas’, yeah colors are better like that for the index. As for the metadata, I think the idea is that it was easier to parse the keys in the previous version and read what's in front

  432. pep.

    Now you have to somewhat go through all of it

  433. jonas’

    pep., how’s this?

  434. pep.

    Another point they made is that section titles are a lot bigger than the actual text which is weird (you changed the ratio?)

  435. jonas’

    pep., I’m not entirely sure what’s going on there, this broke (changed?) when I included base.css from yaml

  436. jonas’

    I also think that the text font size is too small

  437. jonas’

    but I don’t recall yaml to be as bad normally, so I wanted to dig deeper before taking out the font-size sledgehammer

  438. Zash

    jonas’: Steal whatever the hack Bootstrap does with definition lists like here: https://prosody.im/doc/developers#utility_apis

  439. jonas’

    Zash, I kinda did, probably, it’s display: grid in my case

  440. Zash

    jonas’: Oh, I hadn't reloaded

  441. jonas’

    anyways, afk for a while

  442. pep.

    jonas’, yeah metadata formatting seems better now to me as well, but maybe others will say differently :)

  443. pep.

    Also tbh the blue at the top is weird. I get it's our colors but meh :/

  444. pep.

    (that my own opinion)

  445. pep.

    It is better with the green though indeed

  446. Zash

    Having one of the colors used in the logo as background for the logo makes it a bit weird

  447. Ge0rG

    Yeah, the blue bar is weird

  448. jonas’

    also on the todo is "re-use the font from the main website"

  449. jonas’

    pep., Ge0rG, reload

  450. jonas’

    (inspired by the main website)

  451. jonas’

    hm, main website loads font directly from google

  452. pep.

    yeah black-ish is a lot better to me

  453. Ge0rG

    jonas’: something in 0390 makes the content a small bit too wide on mobile, causing horizontal scrolling

  454. Zash

    Hmm, speaking of using the Official XSF Colors, does this look nice https://cerdale.zash.se/upload/DLtZTr_wdX1l95Af/stanza.html ?

  455. fire

    fire, xmpp:yaxim-ru@chat.yax.im?join xmpp:offtopic@chat.disroot.org?join Not work for me

  456. fire

    yaxim-ru@chat.yax.im offtopic@chat.disroot.org No nick name, no menu, no chat, no connect

  457. fire

    How does this work on jimm

  458. Zash

    How do you join here?

  459. fire

    Jid join and connect

  460. Neustradamus

    fire: what is your XMPP client?

  461. fire

    Neustradamus, jimm multi for mobile

  462. Neustradamus

    What is your plateform?

  463. fire

    Android 2.3.6

  464. pep.

    2.3.6 wat

  465. Neustradamus

    Jimm is very old yes

  466. bowlofeggs

    platinum CVE edition

  467. fire

    Version 2.3.6

  468. fire

    Neustradamus, yes

  469. fire

    How shit for mamont

  470. Zash

    What does it look like when you try to join those?

  471. fire

    Zash, not function

  472. Zash

    I can't help with "it doesn't work", sorry.

  473. Neustradamus

    Ah! Your Android does not support new security points maybe

  474. fire

    Maybe

  475. pep.

    fire, do you have any other device available?

  476. moparisthebest

    his android isn't connecting to the remote servers

  477. moparisthebest

    but yea, you should focus on getting that device off the internet ASAP

  478. fire

    pep., no

  479. Zash

    If they can join here, why wouldn't they be able to join those rooms?

  480. pep.

    What tls version/ciphers do you accept here

  481. Zash

    Fairly out-of-the-box Prosody settings

  482. Zash

    fire: "xmpp:" and "?join" are not part of the JID, did you remove those parts?

  483. fire

    Have others casual english rooms for me?

  484. fire

    Zash, yes, with "xmpp" and "?join" = error 400

  485. fire

    What happened?

  486. fire

    Why stop talk?

  487. pep.

    work

  488. Zash

    food

  489. fire

    Tv

  490. Ge0rG

    jonas’: any chance to get 0412 promoted? And the typo fixed on the way...

  491. jonas’

    oh right

  492. jonas’

    I forgot the vote passed

  493. jonas’

    on it right now

  494. jonas’

    Ge0rG, hm, did it pass though?

  495. jonas’

    I can’t seem to find daves vote

  496. Ge0rG

    jonas’: it was on list Monday or Tuesday

  497. jonas’

    it didn’t mention 0412 then

  498. jonas’

    oh wait, it’s Kev’s vote I can’t find

  499. jonas’

    there it is

  500. jonas’

    Ge0rG, it was s/412/410/ in that one revision entry, right?

  501. Ge0rG

    https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2019-April/036028.html

  502. Ge0rG

    jonas’: exactly

  503. Ge0rG

    https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2019-April/036015.html

  504. jonas’

    push’d

  505. Ge0rG

    👍

  506. jonas’

    I think I found the culprit for the horizontal scrolling ...

  507. jonas’

    "Acknowledgements" is simply too long a word

  508. moparisthebest

    shorten it to "Ack"

  509. moparisthebest

    if it's good enough for TCP...

  510. jonas’

    ;)

  511. Neustradamus

    Thanks jonas’ for the 0412->0410 change: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0412.html#appendix-revs