Arc*cheers* I finally got it to work, Prosody now reports whether a connection is bosh or websocket in the admin telnet
pdurbinhas joined
Alexhas left
wurstsalathas left
Archas left
archas left
archas joined
kokonoehas left
kokonoehas joined
UsLhas left
UsLhas joined
UsLhas left
UsLhas joined
lumihas left
Douglas Terabytehas left
pdurbinhas left
pdurbinhas joined
peterhas joined
Archas joined
Douglas Terabytehas joined
pdurbinhas left
pdurbinhas joined
davidhas left
davidhas joined
archas left
archas joined
peterhas left
archas left
archas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
archas left
archas joined
pdurbinhas left
pdurbinhas joined
Archas left
archas left
archas joined
Archas joined
alacerhas joined
j.rhas left
j.rhas joined
靳龙has joined
靳龙？
靳龙hello
j.rhas left
j.rhas joined
alacerhas left
alacerhas joined
wurstsalathas joined
archas left
archas joined
archas left
archas joined
靳龙has left
sezuanhas joined
pdurbinhas left
pdurbinhas joined
jabberjockehas left
flow> dwd> If references is counting codepoints (or even bytes) should we be normalizing the text first?
Yes, I think you have too
karoshihas joined
goffihas joined
mikaelahas joined
mikaelahas left
mikaelahas joined
sezuanhas left
sezuanhas joined
lnjhas joined
Steve Killehas left
Steve Killehas joined
Jeanhas left
Jeanhas joined
UsLhas left
UsLhas joined
rtq3has joined
sezuanhas left
sezuanhas joined
APachhas left
lnjhas left
APachhas joined
rtq3has left
Yagizahas joined
rtq3has joined
Yagizahas left
blablahas joined
Nekithas joined
dwdflow, Right - if anything *can* normalize, everything *must* normalize - seems the general rule.
lnjhas joined
404.cityhas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
404.cityhas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
flowdwd, what's the scope of your "general rule"? It appears to me that you have to normlalize in order to identity codepoints interoperable, but usually, e.g., if you just want to exchange <body/>, you don't have to (and I believe most implementations do not)
lorddavidiiihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
jabberjockehas joined
Dele Olajidehas joined
sezuanhas left
frainzhas left
frainzhas joined
Alexhas joined
rtq3has left
Steve Killehas left
frainzhas left
frainzhas joined
Steve Killehas joined
Archey Zash, I sent a bundle to the -dev list. Looking for what to work on next now that I'm getting a handle on lua
rtq3has joined
ThibGhas left
pdurbinhas left
pdurbinhas joined
ThibGhas joined
dwdflow, Well, if you're reliant on counting codepoints or comparing. Normally we don't care for human text.
pdurbinhas left
debaclehas joined
Jeanhas left
Jeanhas joined
pdurbinhas joined
rtq3has left
rtq3has joined
blablahas left
blablahas joined
jonas’flow, I think normalizing will be bad
jonas’normalizing before sending makes sense, but when receiving, you’ll have to work with exactly the codepoints used in the message
jonas’otherwise we’d have to specify which unicode version to use with References so that everyone normalizes in the same way
Douglas Terabytehas left
igoosehas left
Douglas Terabytehas joined
igoosehas joined
flowjonas’, I think both send and recipient have to normalize if something xep message markup is used
jonas’why?
flownothing gurantees that the way the sender emitted the UTF-8 will be preserved
jonas’err..... what?
jonas’you are saying that there is (aside from intentional modification) no guarantee that the sequence of codepoints I put in an XML element in XMPP arrives as exact that sequence at the receiver?
rtq3has left
rtq3has joined
404.cityhas joined
KevThat's certainly true in some cases, yes.
Keve.g. where the element has attributes that are JIDs, an entity might very reasonably normalise en route.
jonas’Kev, and <body/>?
KevIt wouldn't surprise me, at least.
igoosehas left
igoosehas joined
dwdjonas’, Well, while I don't know of any implementations that do normalize, there's absolutely nothing in the specifications that says implementations MUST NOT normalize.
pdurbinhas left
pdurbinhas joined
jonas’in that case, normalisation needs indeed to be specified, both on the sending (before calculating the offsets) and the receiving side (before matching the offsets)
igoosehas left
Archas left
archas left
jabberjockehas left
debaclehas left
debaclehas joined
flowjonas’, I thank there is nothing that guarantees that this will *not* happen, so I better be safe than sorry here
flow*think
debaclehas left
igoosehas joined
igoosehas left
lskdjfhas left
igoosehas joined
lskdjfhas joined
Dele Olajidehas left
Archas joined
pdurbinhas left
rtq3has left
MattJI'm inclined to agree
rtq3has joined
igoosehas left
pdurbinhas joined
igoosehas joined
archas joined
pdurbinhas left
pdurbinhas joined
lnjhas left
lnjhas joined
igoosehas left
ThibGhas left
igoosehas joined
lnjhas left
pdurbinhas left
ThibGhas joined
pdurbinhas joined
edhelashas left
archas left
archas joined
edhelashas joined
edhelashas left
edhelashas joined
edhelashas left
lnjhas joined
edhelashas joined
lskdjfhas left
debaclehas joined
edhelashas left
madhur.garghas left
edhelashas joined
igoosehas left
igoosehas joined
sezuanhas joined
lnjhas left
edhelashas left
edhelashas joined
lnjhas joined
archas left
archas joined
pdurbinhas left
jubalhhas joined
pdurbinhas joined
jubalhI suppose ignoring of users in MUCs and of jids that write to you 1:1 is done by clients. one doesnt tell the server to "dont deliver messages from X", right?
Ge0rGjubalh: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0191.html for 1:1
jubalhthank you Ge0rG
dwdThinking about it, anytime that data is served from a database rather than simply switched through, probably has been normalized.
frainzhas left
frainzhas joined
igoosehas left
igoosehas joined
Ge0rGexcept when the database is a legacy mysql?
jonas’dwd, right, archives
dwdjonas’, Exactly.
pdurbinhas left
lskdjfhas joined
madhur.garghas joined
pdurbinhas joined
archas left
archas joined
rtq3has left
karoshihas left
andyhas joined
karoshihas joined
andyhas left
andyhas joined
Archas left
archas left
jubalhhas left
jabberjockehas joined
archas joined
rtq3has joined
pdurbinhas left
Nirajhas joined
Nirajmimi89999
andyhas left
Nirajhas left
pdurbinhas joined
igoosehas left
pdurbinhas left
mimi89999Yes?
jubalhhas joined
404.cityhas left
igoosehas joined
alameyohas left
alameyohas joined
rtq3has left
pdurbinhas joined
MattJWe need to create some kind of inline syntax that allows you to apply arbitrary semantics to certain bits of text
larmahas left
eevvoorhas joined
pep.That'd be great, but we need to make sure it's not too verbose
pep.I think we need something that looks like a language we all know, but not too close either
j.rhas joined
pep.Javascript seems like a language we would all know. I'm sure that would make a good markup language
pdurbinI sure hope someone approves the message I sent last night to https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/juser
pep.Does that need approval?
MattJjuser still exists, wow
pdurbin"Your message to JUser awaits moderator approval"
lovetoxhas joined
mimi89999`<body>But, soft! what light through yonder window breaks? It is the east, and <reference type='mention' uri='xmpp:juliet@capulet.lit'>Juliet</reference> is the sun.</body>`
mimi89999Why is this bad?
valohas left
valohas joined
pdurbinDoes anyone here know a moderator for that list?
Zashmimi89999: body is defined as having only text content
elensilhas joined
elensilhas left
elensilhas joined
mimi89999s***
Ge0rGhas left
mimi89999How can we be sue that the offset will always be the same?
pep.That's what's being discussed
Dele Olajidehas joined
ahas joined
ahas left
pdurbinhas left
Ge0rGhas joined
pdurbinhas joined
sezuanhas left
sezuanhas joined
sezuanhas left
Nekithas left
rtq3has joined
j.rhas left
pdurbinI guess I'll wait. Maybe a week. Then I'll ask how to get my post approved.
pep.I'm not sure who has access, board members?
MattJNo
pep.iteam?
pep.I think Seve had access to some of it?
MattJSome subset of iteam
igoosehas left
alameyohas left
alameyohas joined
lnjhas left
rtq3has left
elensilhas left
igoosehas joined
rtq3has joined
pdurbinThanks. Is there a URL for iteam? I can't find it.
MattJI don't think so
MattJThere is a MUC, but I think everyone in it is also in here