emus and I are thinking about doing some kind of introductory presentation for people that never heard xmpp before.
Are there any latex/pp/... Templates that already exist?
COM8has left
pdurbinhas left
pdurbinhas joined
sezuanhas joined
mimi89999has left
jubalhhas left
jabberjockehas joined
Guus
COM8 there's a list of (old) presentations on the wiki that might give you some ideas: https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Presentations
marc_has joined
jubalhhas joined
krauqhas left
krauqhas joined
rtq3has left
jabberjockehas left
jabberjockehas joined
Ge0rG
> When? January.
Gotta love those. Also it's missing my subversive anti xmpp presentation.
intosihas joined
intosihas left
intosihas joined
pdurbinhas left
rtq3has joined
pdurbinhas joined
blablahas left
COM8has joined
blablahas joined
APachhas left
APachhas joined
COM8has left
jabberjockehas left
jabberjockehas joined
blablahas left
blablahas joined
pdurbinhas left
pdurbinhas joined
alameyohas left
APachhas left
APachhas joined
jubalhhas left
alameyohas joined
nycohas joined
marc_has left
rtq3has left
jubalhhas joined
jubalhhas left
jubalhhas joined
jubalhhas left
jubalhhas joined
rtq3has joined
Nekithas left
Nekithas joined
jabberjockehas left
jubalhhas left
debaclehas joined
rtq3has left
pdurbinhas left
lnjhas left
lnjhas joined
Dele Olajidehas joined
eevvoorhas joined
rtq3has joined
lnjhas left
COM8has joined
lnjhas joined
pdurbinhas joined
COM8has left
waqashas left
edhelashas left
madhur.garghas left
edhelashas joined
APachhas left
APachhas joined
COM8has joined
COM8has left
COM8has joined
COM8has left
Steve Killehas left
rtq3has left
j.rhas joined
Steve Killehas joined
pdurbinhas left
pdurbinhas joined
typikolhas joined
APachhas left
COM8has joined
typikolhas left
COM8has left
intosihas left
rtq3has joined
Steve Killehas left
rtq3has left
pdurbinhas left
rtq3has joined
APachhas joined
madhur.garghas joined
lumihas joined
Yagizahas left
Yagizahas joined
pdurbinhas joined
Steve Killehas joined
debaclehas left
rtq3has left
rtq3has joined
pdurbinhas left
pdurbinhas joined
intosihas joined
pdurbinhas left
pdurbinhas joined
debaclehas joined
jabberjockehas joined
pdurbinhas left
alacerhas left
alacerhas joined
APachhas left
mimi89999has joined
pdurbinhas joined
novnovhas joined
APachhas joined
pdurbinhas left
rtq3has left
igoosehas left
Yagizahas left
Yagizahas joined
Yagizahas left
Yagizahas joined
Yagizahas left
Yagizahas joined
pdurbinhas joined
alacerhas left
APachhas left
rtq3has joined
alacerhas joined
Andrew Nenakhovhas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas joined
alacerhas left
alacerhas joined
pdurbinhas left
pdurbinhas joined
Andrew Nenakhovhas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas joined
eevvoorhas left
pdurbinhas left
Yagizahas left
lnjhas left
andyhas left
lnjhas joined
pdurbinhas joined
lnjhas left
Yagizahas joined
alameyohas left
alameyohas joined
lnjhas joined
pdurbinhas left
eevvoorhas joined
APachhas joined
pdurbinhas joined
lnjhas left
lnjhas joined
pdurbinhas left
lnjhas left
pdurbinhas joined
lnjhas joined
nycohas left
rtq3has left
rtq3has joined
lnjhas left
pdurbinhas left
jabberjockehas left
lnjhas joined
alacerhas left
alacerhas joined
alacerhas left
pdurbinhas joined
jabberjockehas joined
jabberjockehas left
pdurbinhas left
pdurbinhas joined
eevvoorhas left
igoosehas joined
APachhas left
lnjhas left
goffihas left
lnjhas joined
pdurbinhas left
pdurbinhas joined
blablahas left
blablahas joined
lnjhas left
lnjhas joined
nycohas joined
pdurbinhas left
jabberjockehas joined
pdurbinhas joined
lnjhas left
pdurbinhas left
larmahas joined
pdurbinhas joined
lnjhas joined
Andrew Nenakhovhas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas joined
pdurbinhas left
larmahas left
larmahas joined
novnovhas left
rtq3has left
goffihas joined
pdurbinhas joined
rtq3has joined
Holgerhas left
larmahas left
larmahas joined
Holgerhas joined
Yagizahas left
Yagizahas joined
lumihas left
goffihas left
goffihas joined
Yagizahas left
Yagizahas joined
lnjhas left
pdurbinhas left
lnjhas joined
COM8has joined
lnjhas left
COM8has left
j.rhas left
lnjhas joined
pdurbinhas joined
j.rhas joined
lnjhas left
lnjhas joined
pdurbinhas left
APachhas joined
larmahas left
marc_has joined
COM8has joined
COM8has left
lnjhas left
larmahas joined
lnjhas joined
pdurbinhas joined
goffihas left
larmahas left
larmahas joined
lskdjfhas joined
jubalhhas joined
jabberjockehas left
goffihas joined
pdurbinhas left
intosihas left
intosihas joined
larmahas left
larmahas joined
pdurbinhas joined
jubalhhas left
jubalhhas joined
Nekithas left
Nekithas joined
jubalhhas left
jubalhhas joined
lnjhas left
lnjhas joined
pdurbinhas left
Nekithas left
pdurbinhas joined
Nekithas joined
lnjhas left
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
lnjhas joined
sezuanhas left
COM8has joined
lumihas joined
igoosehas left
COM8has left
igoosehas joined
lovetoxhas joined
larmahas left
larmahas joined
lnjhas left
Douglas Terabytehas joined
pdurbinhas left
jubalhhas left
jubalhhas joined
Dele Olajidehas left
Dele Olajidehas joined
pdurbinhas joined
lskdjfhas left
lnjhas joined
Dele Olajidehas left
larmahas left
larmahas joined
pdurbinhas left
krauqhas left
krauqhas joined
pdurbinhas joined
Wojtekhas joined
Wojtekhas left
Dele Olajidehas joined
Dele Olajidehas left
Dele Olajidehas joined
jubalhhas left
jubalhhas joined
Steve Killehas left
Dele Olajidehas left
Dele Olajidehas joined
kokonoehas left
lovetox
so if you submit something to the inbox, council votes on it and it gets experimental or rejected
lovetox
how does on submit a protoxep that can be worked on?
pdurbinhas left
pep.
Technically nothing prevents you from working on it and resubmit it? Council should provide feedback as to how improve it, if there is room for improvement, or blockers, or at least why they rejected it
pdurbinhas joined
lovetox
so are you saying there is no protoxep stage?
lovetox
experimental = protoxep?
pep.
no t really sure what protoxep means
kokonoehas joined
Ge0rG
lovetox: what about pausing work for the three weeks that the XEP is in council?
lovetox
Ge0rG, not sure what you are trying to say
lovetox
im refering to the email dave sent to the list
Ge0rG
Let me read that first, then
lovetox
he talks about a protoxep stage, a stage where feedback is gathered and work on a xep is made
lovetox
im not aware of any xeps in that stage, and wondered if he meant experimental?
Steve Killehas joined
jubalhhas left
lskdjfhas joined
Ge0rG
lovetox: there is an inbox for XEPs, and once something is submitted there, the Council will vote whether to accept it or not. Those in this stage are called protoXEP
Ge0rG
After accepting, the protoXEP becomes a real XEP with a number, in Experimental state
lovetox
yeah so if you submit a xep to inbox, this means council can outright reject it and there is not much work in this stage you can do
lovetox
see for example ATT protoxep a few weeks ago
pep.
It got feedback that can be dealt with
pep.
And nothing prevents the author from pushing changes
pdurbinhas left
Alexhas left
Ge0rG
lovetox: it's a little bit awkward because the author shouldn't change a protoXEP currently under review, yes
lnjhas left
jubalhhas joined
igoosehas left
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
igoosehas joined
lnjhas joined
waqashas joined
jubalhhas left
jubalhhas joined
lnjhas left
jonas’
there are a few criteria for acceptance to Experimental, and ATT failed one of them (a clear answer to the question "what is this about?")
jonas’
if your XEP is rough, but can answer that question (and has no other flaws which prevent moving to Experimental), it’ll be moved to Experimental and that’s where the main development should happen
pdurbinhas joined
lnjhas joined
pdurbinhas left
pdurbinhas joined
Kev
It's usually pretty hard to get a protoXEP /not/ be accepted to Experimental. Mostly just "Is obvious what it's trying to do, isn't obviously broken, and isn't duplicating something we've already got without improving it".
rtq3has left
jubalhhas left
jonas’
Kev, ha, now I’ve got you: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/750 pls review
Yagizahas left
Kev
Will try to look tomorrow.
waqashas left
waqashas joined
sezuanhas joined
pdurbinhas left
Dele Olajidehas left
pdurbinhas joined
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
sezuanhas left
lskdjfhas left
pdurbinhas left
pdurbinhas joined
lskdjfhas joined
rtq3has joined
marc_has left
waqashas left
andrey.ghas left
pep.
Kev: improving or taking a different shot at the same problem I'd say
dwd
Well. It *should* be pretty hard to get rejected. Perhaps it isn't right now, and that would be a problem.
pep.
We would know if the XSF had only one solution per problem
jonas’
pep., it’s not about duplicating solutions, but duplicating specific solutions
jonas’
XEP-0390 was accepted despite XEP-0115 existing
Andrew Nenakhovhas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas joined
dwd
But also, if there's discussion around improving a ProtoXEP, that's usually a sign it should be adopted, given a number, and improved within the XSF.
pep.
jonas’: I don't understand the difference you want to make
dwd
In this particular case, there's an existing full stanza encryption XEP, of course. But I don't see that as a bar for any other.
Andrew Nenakhovhas left
Andrew Nenakhovhas joined
pdurbinhas left
Kev
I think discussion alone may be an indication, but isn't conclusive, in the case that something is horribly broken, which might sometimes happen.
Kev
e.g. a security related XEP where the security model is obviously broken.
Kev
I think in that case accepting it to Experimental isn't the right thing, because of the potential for harm if anyone did try to implement it.
Kev
But other than that example, pretty much.
pdurbinhas joined
lnjhas left
lnjhas joined
Alexhas joined
andrey.ghas joined
Holgerhas left
Holgerhas joined
larmahas left
larmahas joined
Holgerhas left
flow
I am all for an IETF I-D like process for ProtoXEPs: Just upload the ProtoXEP, get an stable versioned identifier and have something to point people at
waqashas joined
flow
Since i really feel like the XSF is missing something like that
Holgerhas joined
pdurbinhas left
j.rhas left
j.rhas joined
pdurbinhas joined
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
goffihas left
dwd
The Experimental stage is what is meant to correspond to the IETF 's draft stage.
Zash
So what's the equivalent to 'bis' documents?
larmahas left
larmahas joined
dwd
We just give things a number sooner. The difference is that we act as a working group, and the initial vote is like an apron to a working group draft.
flow
dwd, not sure about that. The requirements are definetly very different
dwd
Adoption. Not apron...
dwd
Flow, they shouldn't be much different to WG adoption.
flow
dwd possibly, but then it is not what like what I had in mind
kokonoehas left
kokonoehas joined
marc_has joined
waqashas left
Wojtekhas joined
Wojtekhas left
pdurbinhas left
lskdjfhas left
pdurbinhas joined
jubalhhas joined
marc_has left
jabberjockehas joined
ralphm
Flow: our process is just fine, IMO, as I tried to put in words in my email to standards@.