XSF Discussion - 2019-07-11

Sorry guys, won't make it for the Board meeting today.

😢

time?

Time

Looks like

we are three? who bangs the gavel

Guus, around?

I think he's on holiday

Ah ok

he was in the council meeting yesterday :-X

(I was just reading the minutes of the meetings I missed)

for me, I just wanted your opinion on Dave's suggestion regarding the badges poll

this does not need a meeting, but ok to ask that question during a board meeting

I have shared reaction to Dave's comment: I want to focus clearly the choice of design, and get rid of everything else, keep it simple but I also want to know how much people are ready to use it... where's the balance?

Can you point me to Dave's suggestion?

"Poll review" on board@...

Jul 8, 2019, 11:19 AM (3 days ago)

I didn't reply but he has a point, although what he suggests I think it is more related to the badges concept itself rather than the design, although a bit related.

is there a public copy?

nyco, thanks (still catching up)

nyco, I think they should all be optional though, if we include the,

them*

Ge0rg, no he suggest that we add questions on usage after the choice

s

will you use it? will you choose a software based on the bagdes? etc.

lgtm

Maybe continue that on the email? So we are all on the loop :) For me it is fine to add his suggestions

Mattj: with or without dave's suggestion?

the pb is I started it on board@...

Ge0rG, we are just talking about the poll that is going to be sent with the different versions for badges

To decide which design is the favourite

the problem I see with it is that all three designs are proof-of-concept quality

Agree

so, too early to have a poll?

we ask each of them to iterate?

I think that's a waste of effort

or we select only one, and ask for iteration?

Mattj what's a waste?

IIRC, the external design was the best-looking, whereas a combination of what I and theTedd did would probably provide the best text content.

Polishing all three just to use one in the end

non-designers talking about design.... argh :)

1. should I add Dave's questions? 2. should I launch the poll?

We're technically not in a formal meeting, I propose we gain consensus on the thread (and maybe loop in Ge0rG, I think sending a draft poll to members@ will be too confusing)

1- Yes, as optional 2- They are proof-of-concept but MattJ is right. I would go for launch the poll and ask for a iteration with the chosen design.

True

ok, I iterate on the poll, send it for review on board@

thx all

I'm a bit confused on how it went but are we done, do we want to start a meeting formally?

Is there anything important on the agenda? If not, I'm fine with just skipping

Looks like the other item is assigned to Ralph (roadmap page)

From what I've looked, just the badges, so I guess it is better to skip

Ok then

I'll send a note to board@

DO NOT VOTE YET, just review and comment for me to iterate, here and now :)

https://forms.gle/kjvFc7B4xCDi9uh87

.GLE WTF.

nyco: you should provide zoomed-in pictures for #2 and #3, also have a question of "are you going to use those on your website?"

Each pic is voluntarily reduced, in order to go check the webpage

"2) If you run an XMPP project, would you use those badges?"

website, repo, doc...

flyers & posters

👍

all of them filling background :)

😂

if ever someone has an idea to produce a mobile client with a logo being a bear, then the eyes should be replaced by the badges... 😜

Talking about Bruno?

oh wait...

I'm not going to put a giant X into Bruno's eyes.

😖

I like the 2 but I think it's will merge with site background, so not gonna look good. So 3.

rion: we'll run the poll later, just creating it for now

I didn't vote =)

you will :)

hello

how can I add on ejabberd muc owner moderator kick admin and grant adminship?

please help

shawn: try ejabberd group ejabberd@conference.process-one.net instead

thanks