XSF Discussion - 2019-09-20

Why is the naming scheme so damn inconsistent :D https://www.w3schools.com/xml/schema_dtypes_numeric.asp

vanitasvitae, https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/829

Thanks for pointing that out :)

vanitasvitae, integer is for arbitrary long integers, while int is for 32-bit integers.

Ah good to know :D

xs:nonNegativeInteger could also have been used, but then it would require clients to use a bigint implementation.

This XEP should also mention XEP-0222.

But first, sleep!

How do i join other groupchats

😕

Link Mauve, if I understand the code correctly it prints that something is a core client and an IM client. however IM (and web and mobile) include core.

and it will print web|mobile|im for something that doesn’t meet the core criteria

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/9951#issuecomment-533436688 any idea about the following? > BTW, are there any other othername variants to be supported and where are they specified? I'm not sure that just OID in the corresponding base is enough.

So xmppAddr is https://xmpp.org/rfcs/rfc6120.html#rfc.section.13.7.1.4

Link Mauve: the DOAP renderer isn't listing the supported RFCs. Is that an issue?

Link Mauve: also speaking of breaking schema changes, is there a reason why the XEP URL is an attribute on SupportedXep/xep and not directly on SupportedXep? It's not like it's optional.

Why is it not on implements ?

I can see how implements is a foreign namespace we can't fiddle with

Ge0rG, because there can only be a single resource, or another Blank Node, for a given object.

Stop thinking in XML terms and read about RDF.

Link Mauve: all those terms don't make sense to me, and I lack the time to actually catch up on it. I'm sure it's a rabbit hole.

Now I'm picturing what Ge0rG woulud look like, dressed up as Alice.

Guus: which one? Original book? Disney? Burton?

The Spicy horse game?

Either way it's not pretty