XSF Discussion - 2019-09-26


  1. aj has left

  2. mimi89999 has left

  3. mimi89999 has joined

  4. mimi89999 has left

  5. mimi89999 has joined

  6. wurstsalat has left

  7. mukt2 has joined

  8. zach has left

  9. zach has joined

  10. patrick has left

  11. mukt2 has left

  12. Daniel has joined

  13. matkor has left

  14. matkor has joined

  15. mukt2 has joined

  16. mukt2 has left

  17. Chobbes has left

  18. Chobbes has joined

  19. mukt2 has joined

  20. UsL has left

  21. UsL has joined

  22. mukt2 has left

  23. pdurbin has joined

  24. kokonoe has left

  25. pdurbin has left

  26. kokonoe has joined

  27. remko has joined

  28. neshtaxmpp has left

  29. neshtaxmpp has joined

  30. remko has left

  31. Daniel has left

  32. mukt2 has joined

  33. UsL has left

  34. mukt2 has left

  35. zach has left

  36. zach has joined

  37. Daniel has joined

  38. lskdjf has left

  39. lorddavidiii has left

  40. lorddavidiii has joined

  41. mukt2 has joined

  42. mukt2 has left

  43. Daniel has left

  44. Daniel has joined

  45. andy has joined

  46. mukt2 has joined

  47. pdurbin has joined

  48. mukt2 has left

  49. murabito has left

  50. murabito has joined

  51. mukt2 has joined

  52. Chobbes has left

  53. xalek has left

  54. mukt2 has left

  55. kokonoe has left

  56. Tobias has joined

  57. kokonoe has joined

  58. matkor has left

  59. zach has left

  60. zach has joined

  61. Nekit has joined

  62. matkor has joined

  63. LNJ has joined

  64. waqas has left

  65. Daniel has left

  66. LNJ has left

  67. Yagiza has joined

  68. Daniel has joined

  69. LNJ has joined

  70. wurstsalat has joined

  71. aj has joined

  72. kokonoe has left

  73. kokonoe has joined

  74. mukt2 has joined

  75. mukt2 has left

  76. jcbrand has joined

  77. zach has left

  78. zach has joined

  79. kokonoe has left

  80. kokonoe has joined

  81. mukt2 has joined

  82. zach has left

  83. zach has joined

  84. Nekit has left

  85. Nekit has joined

  86. goffi has joined

  87. karoshi has joined

  88. Zash has left

  89. Zash has joined

  90. emus has joined

  91. aj has left

  92. Nekit has left

  93. Nekit has joined

  94. mukt2 has left

  95. remko has joined

  96. debacle has joined

  97. kokonoe has left

  98. kokonoe has joined

  99. kokonoe has left

  100. jubalh has joined

  101. kokonoe has joined

  102. zach has left

  103. zach has joined

  104. alameyo has left

  105. alameyo has joined

  106. Steve Kille has left

  107. Steve Kille has joined

  108. emus has left

  109. Yagiza has left

  110. Yagiza has joined

  111. emus has joined

  112. debacle has left

  113. jubalh has left

  114. dele has joined

  115. Maranda has left

  116. Maranda has joined

  117. Maranda has left

  118. Maranda has joined

  119. zach has left

  120. zach has joined

  121. pdurbin has left

  122. kokonoe has left

  123. kokonoe has joined

  124. debacle has joined

  125. aj has joined

  126. larma has left

  127. intosi has left

  128. intosi has joined

  129. larma has joined

  130. Syndace has left

  131. dele has left

  132. lumi has joined

  133. !xsf_Martin has left

  134. edhelas has left

  135. edhelas has joined

  136. !xsf_Martin has joined

  137. intosi has left

  138. Mikaela has joined

  139. gav has joined

  140. zach has left

  141. zach has joined

  142. lorddavidiii has left

  143. lorddavidiii has joined

  144. Yagiza has left

  145. Yagiza has joined

  146. jonas’

    MattJ, after council meeting isn’t really going to work for me, I’m usually preparing dinner then. I assume weekends aren’t going to work for you?

  147. MattJ

    Usually not, but I might be able to make this Sunday work

  148. winfried has left

  149. winfried has joined

  150. jonas’

    SMS-based 2fa is very convenient with MAXS ;-) (cc and thx @ flow)

  151. LNJ has left

  152. LNJ has joined

  153. Ge0rG

    jonas’: it's also reducing the number of factors.

  154. jonas’

    Ge0rG, yeah

  155. jonas’

    although that depends really

  156. jonas’

    but in any case, I’m not fond of SMS based 2fa anyways

  157. jonas’

    I don’t trust the phone or phone network with that

  158. MattJ

    I agree, MAXS makes it easier

  159. Yagiza has left

  160. Yagiza has joined

  161. Syndace has joined

  162. MattJ

    and it's not really removing a factor, it just means you have to have your phone or your laptop, the other factor is still the password

  163. MattJ

    Unless you have the password saved on the laptop :)

  164. pdurbin has joined

  165. MattJ

    Huh, we swapped rooms

  166. Ge0rG

    MattJ: or in the app on your phone

  167. remko has left

  168. remko has joined

  169. lskdjf has joined

  170. jubalh has joined

  171. pdurbin has left

  172. zach has left

  173. zach has joined

  174. mukt2 has joined

  175. remko has left

  176. jubalh has left

  177. mukt2 has left

  178. remko has joined

  179. zach has left

  180. zach has joined

  181. zach has left

  182. zach has joined

  183. Nekit has left

  184. Nekit has joined

  185. Chobbes has joined

  186. winfried has left

  187. winfried has joined

  188. zach has left

  189. zach has joined

  190. aj has left

  191. jubalh has joined

  192. Tobias has left

  193. Tobias has joined

  194. jubalh has left

  195. lorddavidiii has left

  196. emus has left

  197. emus has joined

  198. zach has left

  199. zach has joined

  200. nyco has joined

  201. Chobbes has left

  202. zach has left

  203. zach has joined

  204. mukt2 has joined

  205. winfried has left

  206. winfried has joined

  207. UsL has joined

  208. zach has left

  209. zach has joined

  210. dele has joined

  211. COM8 has joined

  212. dele has left

  213. mukt2 has left

  214. COM8 has left

  215. Dele (Mobile) has joined

  216. Chobbes has joined

  217. Chobbes has left

  218. nyco

    test

  219. Kev

    toast

  220. winfried has left

  221. winfried has joined

  222. Guus

    donkey!

  223. remko has left

  224. Zash has left

  225. Zash has joined

  226. zach has left

  227. zach has joined

  228. mukt2 has joined

  229. Dele (Mobile) has left

  230. nyco_

    5

  231. Dele (Mobile) has joined

  232. nyco_

    _o/

  233. nyco_

    Ralph is not joining, excused by email

  234. Seve

    Can someone else chair today, please?

  235. Guus

    Hi guys

  236. Guus

    MattJ - are you around?

  237. MattJ

    Here

  238. nyco_

    quorum

  239. Guus bangs the gavel

  240. Guus

    Hello, and welcome to the umptieth edition of the XSF board meeting!

  241. Guus

    1) Role call and agenda

  242. MattJ

    Here

  243. Guus

    we've established that everyone is here, but Ralph that just sent an email to apologise

  244. Guus

    as usual, the agenda is driven by our Trello board at https://trello.com/b/Dn6IQOu0/board-meetings

  245. Andrew Nenakhov has joined

  246. MattJ

    Re. agenda: I propose we tackle some of the items we didn't cover last week, due to the length of the DOAP discussion last week

  247. Guus

    does anyone want us to address anything that's not on there?

  248. MattJ

    and if we have time, we can revisit DOAP

  249. Seve

    Yes, I would also like to do that, MattJ

  250. Guus

    I have no preference either way.

  251. zach has left

  252. zach has joined

  253. Seve

    (And I do not have anything for the agenda)

  254. Guus

    Unless nyco strongly objects within the next few moments, so it shall be then.

  255. Guus

    2) Confirm minute taker

  256. Andrew Nenakhov has left

  257. Guus

    Who would be so kind?

  258. nyco_

    I object this objection! :)

  259. Dele (Mobile) has left

  260. MattJ

    I'll do it

  261. dele has joined

  262. Guus

    Anyone? We'd be helped a lot by someone taking notes, compiling them and sending them on the members lists after the meeting. There's nothing more to it.

  263. Guus

    Thanks MattJ - if anyone that's not also taking part in the discussion would consider doing this next time(s), please!

  264. Guus

    3) Topics for decisions

  265. Guus

    3.1) Sponsorship request

  266. MattJ

    Ralph isn't here, but indicated he would rather decline this unless we can determine their relationship with XMPP

  267. Guus

    we received this offer: > I represent a company called TheBestVPN.com and we'd like to make a sponsorship for XMPP. > Can you let us know if you're accepting any new sponsorship request and are there any perks associated with it?

  268. MattJ

    Also, relatedly, I just searched my inbox to find the email from Peter

  269. MattJ

    and turned up an email from someone at TheBestVPN.com to a Debian mailing list, which looked like a thinly-veiled SEO attempt

  270. Seve

    I tried to find some information about them on the Internet but it is not quite clear to me if there is a real support for XMPP or it is a "kind of SEO request"

  271. Guus

    I'm not sure if we should limit ourselves to sponsors that have a direct relation to XMPP

  272. nyco_

    fine, so be it: it's no

  273. MattJ

    I don't see anything particularly shady in any of it itself, but we've previously declined SEO-only sponsors, and I'm inclined to maintain this policy

  274. nyco_

    do we need to debate more?

  275. Guus

    I do think we should not have sponsors that only want to use us for blatant SEO

  276. nyco_

    they are bad SEO then, because you can some for free

  277. Guus

    Well, this guy didn't say/do anything to suggest that this is a SEO attempt.

  278. Seve

    Guus, I think we should not close the doors to any sponsors, either XMPP supporters or not, but yeah, not only SEO requests

  279. Guus

    He just offered to sponsor, and asked about the perks.

  280. Seve

    Indeed

  281. Guus

    I see no harm in pointing him at the website that lists the perks.

  282. Ge0rG

    related: https://www.pcmag.com/news/367640/how-a-vpn-review-site-dominated-google-search-with-a-scam

  283. Guus

    Thanks Ge0rG - that's a troubling headline.

  284. MattJ

    Based on everything I've seen so far, and the email to the Debian list, it's 99.99% likely to be SEO-related

  285. Guus

    Given that, I suggest that we reject based on the shady history of the company, and that we're reluctant to be associated to that.

  286. Ge0rG

    I suggest to drop and not to reject.

  287. nyco_

    yes, please, let's reject it

  288. Guus

    Ge0rG ?

  289. Ge0rG

    don't reply at all, that reduces the risk of long discussions.

  290. nyco_

    fine

  291. Guus

    He already sent a follow-up question. I'll try to formulate a response - that's the least we can do.

  292. Ge0rG

    people who are good at SEO are also good at sending follow-up requests

  293. Guus

    so, we reject this offer due to the perceived SEO-nature and non-positive history of the company?

  294. nyco_

    on LinuxFr, I usually reject kindly all ads, promoted content, links exchanges, partnerships... explicity, it helps I get a "thank you" almost every time

  295. nyco_

    I'd reject based on non-relatedness to XMPP

  296. Ge0rG

    Any kind of rejection needs to be well argued based on our public policy.

  297. Guus

    I don't want to reject it based on non-XMPP relationship. That's an excuse.

  298. nyco_

    no one in that company has written XMPP software, no one is a member => correct assumption?

  299. mukt2 has left

  300. Ge0rG

    Writing a proper rejection will be some work.

  301. MattJ

    I know why you would say "don't limit us to XMPP-related things only", but if someone wants to sponsor us who is not related to XMPP or aligned with the XSF's goals, what could their motives be?

  302. nyco_

    no, it's quite easy and fast

  303. Seve

    Apart from SEO... Hmm

  304. MattJ

    SEO is top of that list

  305. Seve

    Good people?

  306. Seve

    ÑD

  307. Guus

    MattJ supporting OSS / Open standards?

  308. Seve

    :D

  309. MattJ

    Guus, that aligns with our goals, obviously

  310. nyco_

    I feel we're wasting too much time on this

  311. Guus

    I tend to agree nyco.

  312. MattJ

    Well, we're not just really discussing this request, but how to deal with requests of this kind (this is not the first and it won't be the last)

  313. Guus

    I'll draft a rejection reply, and share it with board.

  314. nyco_

    +1

  315. Guus

    if there's no consensus via mail, we can pick this up again next week.

  316. MattJ

    Ultimately we could provide Peter with some guidance on how to handle these himself

  317. MattJ

    Instead of every inbound SEO request ending up on Board's agenda

  318. MattJ

    which believe me, doesn't happen in any other sane organisation

  319. Guus

    given that this is our second request in as many years... 🙂

  320. nyco_

    we get two or three such requests per month on LinuxFr.org

  321. nyco_

    it takes 5 min each

  322. MattJ

    Then maybe no general action is needed, let's just ask Peter to kindly reject with a one-liner

  323. Seve

    We would need to check if he said he would forward it to Board

  324. Guus

    I'll send the one-liner.

  325. Guus

    Let's move on

  326. Seve

    Ok, thank you.

  327. Guus

    4) Commitment for the week ahead

  328. Guus

    I'm skipping over the issues with Ralph's face tagged to it, as he's not here

  329. Guus

    which leaves

  330. Guus

    4.1) GSOC '19 evaluation

  331. Guus

    Nyco, I'm seeing your name attached to that

  332. Guus

    Do we want to do anything here?

  333. nyco_

    yes, https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/GSoC_2019 or not... just asked the commTeam

  334. nyco_

    sorry, it went out of my mind

  335. Guus

    No worries, I have a similar mind 🙂

  336. nyco_

    we are closing the newsletter tomorrow, we'll send a PR on GitHub, for a publication on Tue 1st Oct

  337. nyco_

    so either someone write a short piece

  338. Guus

    comms related to this is good, but not something that board is needed for.

  339. nyco_

    or we forget it

  340. Maranda has left

  341. nyco_

    agree

  342. Guus

    do we want to evaluate the process itself? Eg: flow organizing things for the first time?

  343. nyco_

    he hasn't got time for this, I asked

  344. Guus

    I think I pinged him on that, but forgot his response, if I got any.

  345. Guus

    Ok - Is there anyone that feels an evaluation is needed?

  346. Guus

    We seem to hav had a successful gsoc?

  347. nyco_

    maybe a summary could do, as a reminder for our newsletter readers

  348. zach has left

  349. zach has joined

  350. nyco_

    (and contribute to SEO as well...)

  351. Seve

    Ideally I would like someone related to it

  352. Guus

    that's comms again 🙂

  353. Guus

    (and: fine by me)

  354. Guus

    I'm not hearing anyone particularly wanting to go over this.

  355. nyco_

    I'll try, low proba it will end up in the newsletter

  356. Ge0rG

    Aren't there blogs kept by all participants? A summary could link those.

  357. Guus

    Yeah, I intended this to be not about comms

  358. Guus

    but more around the question: do we want to organize things differently next year?

  359. Guus

    I don't see any reason to, and as I'm having trouble getting this discussion off the ground, let's skip it completely and thank Flow and others involved for their effort.

  360. Seve

    That would require input from the people involved in it, I can't tell much, unfortunately.

  361. Guus

    5) Items for discussion

  362. Guus

    5.1) Publicize XSF financials

  363. Guus

    This is in response to a question I received from an XSF Member about the state of the XSF financials.

  364. Guus

    let me quote some stuff

  365. Seve

    Where they done public in the past? I've read that by someone but can't remember who :)

  366. Guus

    > Earlier today, a member had detailed questions on XSF financials (what do we spend money on, how do we obtain money, etc). He asked if/why data was private. > I had to admit that I simply didn't know. I feel that much of this isn't private data, but I don't think we publicly share information either. > There's a least one member that hinted at us being secretive about the financials. I don't think that's necessarily true, but since we've not been publishing any information, I can see how that can be perceived as being secretive. > Someone else mentioned that the XSF has been 'more open' about this in the past. I'm thinking that the lack of information sharing is largely caused by people being less active, and not so much a deliberate attempt at withholding data. What do you think? > I'd hate for people to feel that we're doing things in the dark here. If we did things differently before, can you share on what worked well at that time?

  367. Seve

    Just to know how things went previously, etc

  368. Guus

    that was all me, to Peter

  369. Guus

    Peter responded: > The board has never set a policy on this. If we want to open the books, it is easy enough to do. and > Well, "secretive" is a bit strong. In the far past we posted a kind of spreadsheet on the website, describing various expenses. I'd be happy to do that again, and even reconstruct expenses for all the years between then and now. Naturally it will take me some time to generate that information from file folders in my safe. 🙂

  370. patrick has joined

  371. Guus

    (that concludes my quoting of things)

  372. Guus

    I'd not mind taking Peter up on that offer.

  373. Seve

    That helps a lot, really

  374. MattJ

    Is backfilling a requirement?

  375. Guus

    Which in my perspective is basically picking up where we left off.

  376. jonas’

    floor comment: I suggest we don’t put too much load on peter in htis regard and do not ask for expense summaries since back then

  377. MattJ

    I agree, I'd rather not provide Peter with more work if we can help it

  378. nyco_

    agree, it's a question of RoI

  379. Guus

    I disagree. If we do make things public, it shouldn't have gaps.

  380. nyco_

    ROTI, return on time invested

  381. jonas’

    unless a majority of members wants that information, of course

  382. pep.

    MattJ: is as one of the people to ask about this, I don't mind if it's just from now on.

  383. Guus

    also, I'm guessing that the work involved is light, as he already should have administation

  384. MattJ

    Guus, we make things public from today, I don't see the problem

  385. MattJ

    He said himself it will "take some time"

  386. patrick has left

  387. Guus

    Sure, doesn't need to happen overnight

  388. nyco_

    can we easily track the board's decisions regarding spending?

  389. Guus

    but I think it's sensible to have a complete record.

  390. MattJ

    I feel it's unfair to ask him to put in that time just to satisfy the curiosity of a couple of folks, when just general overview of current+future would be fine

  391. Guus

    also, he offered without being asked to.

  392. MattJ

    We're over time again and I need to prep for my next meeting

  393. Guus

    I'm not seeing this as satisfying curiosity, but as a way to be transparant as an organisastion.

  394. Guus

    Ok, can we conclude this before you go?

  395. MattJ

    I've no objection to transparency

  396. nyco_

    yep, we are fully transparent with the board, holding meetings in public...

  397. MattJ

    But I don't see that historical records are a hard requirement

  398. MattJ

    I see them as a nice thing to have, but I think publishing our current financial state and maintaining that going forwards is plenty of improvement already

  399. Kev

    What practical purpose would historical records have, compared to current?

  400. nyco_

    trust?

  401. jonas’

    middle-ground: add a note (to whereever this is going to be published) that historical records are not available in digital form, but can be requested by any member at any time

  402. Kev

    How is a lack of trust current presenting itself?

  403. andy has left

  404. andy has joined

  405. Kev

    How is a lack of trust currently presenting itself?

  406. nyco_

    not sure, people asking on written form?

  407. Guus

    In the interest of time, let's move this to next week

  408. MattJ

    Kev, well, arguably I could have been colluding with Peter to siphon XSF funds into the Prosody project, hence my argument to keep the records closed :)

  409. nyco_

    (guessing...)

  410. Guus

    Matt needs to go.

  411. Guus

    6) AOB (that are pressing?)

  412. nyco_

    nope

  413. MattJ

    I obviously haven't, but there is merit to having open historical records

  414. Guus

    7) Date/Time of next +1w?

  415. MattJ

    wfm

  416. nyco_

    +1

  417. Guus

    do we have DST changes upon us?

  418. Guus

    (it's that time of year)

  419. Guus

    we're all on the same switchover date, I think?

  420. Seve

    Yes, we are.

  421. MattJ

    in a few weeks at least

  422. nyco_

    nope

  423. nyco_

    ah ok, not this weekend

  424. Maranda has joined

  425. Guus

    Ok, we'll continue to use London time then, which should avoid us being affected at all

  426. Guus bangs gavel

  427. Guus

    thanks!

  428. nyco_

    26-27th Oct

  429. Seve

    Thank you :)

  430. nyco_

    thx all!

  431. MattJ

    Thanks!

  432. MattJ

    I'll have to finish the minutes after my meetings today

  433. Guus

    Kev - I think the purpose of opening the books is to prevent a lack of trust manifesting itself.

  434. Guus

    not the other way around

  435. Kev

    Yes, and opening the books from now seems quite pragmatic and sensible. I'm not sure it's worth the effort of going back and reconstructing reports, given Peter's time is presumably not easy to come by.

  436. emus has left

  437. Kev

    But YMMV.

  438. Guus

    I appreciate that, but a) he offered, and b) it kind of comes with the role of being a Treasurer.

  439. Guus

    it's not that I suggest we pressure him into doing things

  440. Guus

    but as he offered, and I think it'd be good to have a full set of records, I'm inclined to take him up on that offer.

  441. Guus

    also, I'm happy for this to not be ready tomorrow.

  442. Seve

    I don't see any specific urgency on this, either. But I also do not expect members to request trust from Boards long time ago.

  443. emus has joined

  444. zach has left

  445. zach has joined

  446. Guus

    I'm envisioning this as nothing more than a simple table, right - not extensive details

  447. Seve

    I guessed so.

  448. nyco_

    anything you publish, you might have questions around it

  449. nyco_

    if not objections

  450. Guus

    then we decide to not publish anything

  451. nyco_

    hehehe

  452. Guus

    (which I think is a bad idea)

  453. nyco_

    hide and stop doing things

  454. jonas’

    Guus, there appears to be a full set of records, it’s just not public

  455. jonas’

    thus my middle-ground suggestion above

  456. Guus

    jonas’ which I didn't dislike.

  457. pdurbin has joined

  458. pdurbin has left

  459. remko has joined

  460. MattJ

    same

  461. emus has left

  462. zach has left

  463. zach has joined

  464. emus has joined

  465. kokonoe has left

  466. marc_ has left

  467. marc_ has joined

  468. winfried has left

  469. winfried has joined

  470. dele has left

  471. nyco has left

  472. zach has left

  473. zach has joined

  474. kokonoe has joined

  475. winfried has left

  476. winfried has joined

  477. wojtek has joined

  478. Tobias has left

  479. Tobias has joined

  480. Dele (Mobile) has joined

  481. karoshi has left

  482. karoshi has joined

  483. Dele (Mobile) has left

  484. Dele (Mobile) has joined

  485. winfried has left

  486. winfried has joined

  487. zach has left

  488. zach has joined

  489. mukt2 has joined

  490. winfried has left

  491. winfried has joined

  492. winfried has left

  493. winfried has joined

  494. marc_ has left

  495. marc_ has joined

  496. Wojtek has joined

  497. mukt2 has left

  498. zach has left

  499. zach has joined

  500. wojtek has left

  501. emus has left

  502. emus has joined

  503. kokonoe has left

  504. kokonoe has joined

  505. emus has left

  506. emus has joined

  507. zach has left

  508. zach has joined

  509. kokonoe has left

  510. debacle has left

  511. pdurbin has joined

  512. zach has left

  513. zach has joined

  514. pdurbin has left

  515. lovetox has joined

  516. Nekit has left

  517. zooly12 has joined

  518. zooly12 has left

  519. zach has left

  520. !xsf_Martin has left

  521. zach has joined

  522. !xsf_Martin has joined

  523. marc_ has left

  524. Steve Kille has left

  525. Dele (Mobile) has left

  526. Dele (Mobile) has joined

  527. Steve Kille has joined

  528. waqas has joined

  529. marc_ has joined

  530. kokonoe has joined

  531. zach has left

  532. zach has joined

  533. gav has left

  534. patrick has joined

  535. kokonoe has left

  536. kokonoe has joined

  537. kokonoe has left

  538. debacle has joined

  539. lumi has left

  540. kokonoe has joined

  541. mukt2 has joined

  542. zach has left

  543. zach has joined

  544. mukt2 has left

  545. Wojtek has left

  546. zach has left

  547. zach has joined

  548. Dele (Mobile) has left

  549. remko has left

  550. remko has joined

  551. neshtaxmpp has left

  552. neshtaxmpp has joined

  553. zach has left

  554. zach has joined

  555. Chobbes has joined

  556. zach has left

  557. zach has joined

  558. pdurbin has joined

  559. lorddavidiii has joined

  560. pdurbin has left

  561. zach has left

  562. zach has joined

  563. remko has left

  564. remko has joined

  565. lumi has joined

  566. mr.fister has joined

  567. Douglas Terabyte has left

  568. Douglas Terabyte has joined

  569. zach has left

  570. zach has joined

  571. remko has left

  572. remko has joined

  573. mukt2 has joined

  574. lumi has left

  575. lumi has joined

  576. mukt2 has left

  577. xalek has joined

  578. remko has left

  579. Nekit has joined

  580. zach has left

  581. zach has joined

  582. kokonoe has left

  583. zach has left

  584. zach has joined

  585. lorddavidiii has left

  586. LNJ has left

  587. lorddavidiii has joined

  588. Yagiza has left

  589. jubalh has joined

  590. remko has joined

  591. Chobbes has left

  592. jubalh has left

  593. lorddavidiii has left

  594. pdurbin has joined

  595. matlag has left

  596. matlag has joined

  597. pdurbin has left

  598. lovetox has left

  599. remko has left

  600. winfried has left

  601. winfried has joined

  602. winfried has left

  603. winfried has joined

  604. winfried has left

  605. winfried has joined

  606. matlag has left

  607. matlag has joined

  608. winfried has left

  609. winfried has joined

  610. zach has left

  611. zach has joined

  612. Tobias has left

  613. Wojtek has joined

  614. vanitasvitae has left

  615. kokonoe has joined

  616. mr.fister has left

  617. mr.fister has joined

  618. remko has joined

  619. zach has left

  620. zach has joined

  621. Nekit has left

  622. Mikaela has left

  623. mukt2 has joined

  624. remko has left

  625. mukt2 has left

  626. andy has left

  627. andy has joined

  628. zach has left

  629. zach has joined

  630. kokonoe has left

  631. kokonoe has joined

  632. gav has joined

  633. vanitasvitae has joined

  634. lskdjf has left

  635. vanitasvitae has left

  636. remko has joined

  637. andy has left

  638. karoshi has left

  639. kokonoe has left

  640. gav has left

  641. gav has joined

  642. remko has left

  643. pdurbin has joined

  644. edhelas has left

  645. edhelas has joined

  646. neshtaxmpp has left

  647. pdurbin has left

  648. matkor has left

  649. neshtaxmpp has joined

  650. debacle has left

  651. metaentropy has joined

  652. goffi has left

  653. metaentropy

    /quit

  654. metaentropy has left

  655. neshtaxmpp has left

  656. wurstsalat has left

  657. Wojtek has left

  658. david has left

  659. mr.fister has left

  660. remko has joined

  661. aj has joined

  662. david has joined

  663. aj has left

  664. mukt2 has joined

  665. lumi has left

  666. lumi has joined

  667. UsL has left

  668. UsL has joined

  669. mukt2 has left

  670. Chobbes has joined

  671. matkor has joined

  672. murabito has left

  673. remko has left