XSF Discussion - 2019-10-06

lovetox_, you answered to me again :p

damn it

yeah but standards is cc

so does this work?

yeah it does

I hadn't noticed the CC

Just noticed that you ended up in the wrong folder

thunderbird has a nice Answer to List option

gmail hasnt sadly

Also top posting :(

I've recently searched for something xmpp related and ddg displayed https://svn.xmpp.org/feeds/all.atom.xml as a hit. The hostname exists, the certificate is wrong, but the atom feed looks like from our blog. Maybe iteam should kill the svn hostname? Cc MattJ Kev

yeah, it probably simply aliases to xmpp.org on the web server side of things

“12:22:07 flow> which we may should rename to something like <description-text/>”, I’ll add that to my long-overdue JingleFT list of things to fix.

jonas’, "<xs:attribute name='max_items' type='xs:positiveInteger' use='optional'/>" :(

if examples are not normative i don’t see max_items mentioned anywhere in the XEP

so i don’t even know where to add the clarified definition of max_items

jonas’, hmm, maybe it's not for that max_items, sorry

"pubsub#purge_offline: Whether to purge all items when the relevant publisher goes offline", what does this mean? What's the use-case for this

who knows

I'm sure it's useful for something.

Like removing the future status-in-PEP when you go offline?

Or mood/activity

Ô pubsub globs, (edhelas, goffi), have you not run into the max_items issue before? (I'm sure you have)

Zash, oh

am I seeing that correctly that the only place to specify max_items behaviour is in the label of the data form in 16.4.4?

yeah, instead of poezio issuing a (3) retract(s) when going offline

Daniel if you add a paragraph do it also for pubsub#item_expire

lovetox_, what do you mean?

its the same deal

a field you have to set to a positive integer, and there is no "whatever the servers max is" option

ok

i wasn’t going to add a paragraph. but yeah I can clarify that as well :-)

also pubsub#children_max

Daniel, you modifed pubsub#children

instead of pubsub#children_max

i dont know what children exactly holds, but its not a number

Isn't that about the pubsub tree structure thing with nodes and leafs?

lovetox_, fixing

fixed

Link Mauve, +1, is the list public somewhere? Maybe even in the wiki?

B 🙁

🅱

pep., which max_items issue? Sorry I have little time to read logs

https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2019-October/036502.html

Just read the first mail. I'm sure you're also hitting similar issues for normal microblog/pubsub

Daniel, as I said in my mail, I think the max_items thing deserves a feature

no wait, I got confused between PRs

servers which don’t support that will probably simply fail

yes jonas’ servers should not accept values they can nothing do with

https://www.ccc.de/en/updates/2019/36c3-in-leipzig if anybody wants to talk at CCC

That would be great. It can also be made from several once to reflect different "sections" of xmpp. And we might get contact to the jabber.ccc.de guys to overwork their servers? 😀