Link MauveBut it means you have to add support for it in every single parser, rather than just once at the iq level.
eevvoorhas left
Link MauveImagine I forgot to implement it in the disco#info parser, I would fail to notice that your disco#info reply was evil.
Link MauveThat in itself is a security issue.
goffihas left
flowWould that be true for a namespaced attribute also?
flow*Wouldn't that be
eevvoorhas joined
j.rhas left
emushas left
emushas joined
eevvoorhas left
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
j.rhas joined
eevvoorhas joined
zachhas left
zachhas joined
emushas left
emushas joined
jubalhhas left
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
jubalhhas joined
eevvoorhas left
zachhas left
zachhas joined
goffihas joined
emushas left
zachhas left
zachhas joined
jubalhhas left
emushas joined
kokonoehas joined
pdurbinhas joined
jubalhhas joined
kokonoehas left
emushas left
emushas joined
pdurbinhas left
Chobbeshas left
Chobbeshas joined
moparisthebesthas joined
mukt2has left
mukt2has joined
mukt2has left
mukt2has joined
zachhas left
zachhas joined
Mikaelahas left
Mikaelahas joined
adiaholichas left
zachhas left
zachhas joined
adiaholichas joined
mukt2has left
andyhas left
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
mukt2has joined
j.rhas left
lorddavidiiihas left
zachhas left
zachhas joined
Chobbeshas left
adiaholichas left
j.rhas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
APachhas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
eevvoorhas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
zachhas left
zachhas joined
krauqhas left
krauqhas joined
adiaholichas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
Chobbeshas joined
zachhas left
zachhas joined
mukt2has left
j.rhas left
jubalhhas left
jubalhhas joined
goffihas left
jubalhhas left
zachhas left
zachhas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
pdurbinhas joined
eevvoorhas left
eevvoorhas joined
adiaholichas left
mukt2has joined
j.rhas joined
UsLhas joined
pdurbinhas left
adiaholichas joined
zachhas left
zachhas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
kokonoehas joined
Syndacehas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
waqashas joined
adiaholichas left
ajhas joined
Mikaelahas left
Mikaelahas joined
Wojtekhas joined
zachhas left
zachhas joined
kokonoehas left
adiaholichas joined
Syndacehas joined
kokonoehas joined
waqashas left
jonas’Kev, while I have you on the hook, can you look at the docker hub thing? I didn’t have permissions to set up the builds myself.
jonas’Kev, while I have you on the hook, did you have a chance to look at the docker hub thing? I didn’t have permissions to set up the builds myself.
KevOh, no, I didn't. I think that's you not having rights on github, as I've given you maximal rights on docker hub.
jonas’Kev, I’m not sure about that
jonas’also that web interface is extremely confusing
KevIt is (confusing).
jonas’Kev, I think I’d need permissions on the org, not on the docker repo on docker hub to do this
mukt2has left
KevI think you need permission on the org, not the repo, on github to do this. I could be wrong.
KevIncluded in the right you've been granted on dockerhub is linking to github, unless I forget what I read.
jonas’I’m pretty sure it’s on the docker hub side of things
jonas’because it briefly shows me the org settings before deciding that I shouldn’t be able to use those
jonas’this here is a 404 for me: https://cloud.docker.com/u/xmppxsf/settings/xmppxsf/dashboard
jonas’and it wants me to go there to connect to github
KevIt's a 404 for me too.
jonas’m(
jonas’maybe this is a glitch in the software then
jonas’can *you* connect the repo to github?
jonas’https://cloud.docker.com/u/xmppxsf/repository/docker/xmppxsf/registry/builds via this
KevYes, but it requires me to grant access to assorted organisations that I don't want to, it seems, which is why I left it for someone else to do.
KevBut it does indeed seem to be doing it through the org settings, you're right.
jonas’so it’s GitHubs weird authz model again
KevOr what docker hub is asking for, possibly.
KevBut it wants read/write access to the whole world.
jonas’yeah, which it gets unless the GitHub org has prevented that by default >.>
jonas’that’s GitHubs stupid model
mukt2has joined
Kevhttps://docs.docker.com/docker-hub/builds/#service-users-for-team-autobuilds says something about this, haven't read it yet.
eevvoorhas left
zachhas left
Nekithas left
zachhas joined
Nekithas joined
Kevjonas’: So I think what needs to happen is the XSF to have an appropriately-limited service account created on github, and then an org owner on dockerhub to link them.
KevI'd suggest Matt getting himself owner access to Docker Hub would be a better start to this than continuing with me having access and other iteam not.
jonas’that sounds like a PITA
jonas’why does it work for xeps etc.?
KevI assume it was configured at some previous time when different access was needed.
debaclehas left
zachhas left
zachhas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
Chobbeshas left
kokonoehas left
kokonoehas joined
Chobbeshas joined
davidhas left
zachhas left
zachhas joined
davidhas joined
adiaholichas left
Ge0rGDaniel, jonas’: I want to add JFT to CS-2020. Should I also mandate SOCKS5, IBB, or both? I tend to have IBB only as a minimum consensus.
Danielibb is a MUST in jingle ft iirc
jonas’Ge0rG, yes, IBB
ZashThe last fallback.
jonas’as minimum consensus
jonas’advanced should probably support SOCKS5
Ge0rGDaniel: ah, ok. Then it doesn't hurt to have it in CS2020.
jonas’Ge0rG, I’d like to nominate Jingle Encryption for Future things
jonas’Ge0rG, I’d like to nominate Jingle Encryption for Future Things
jonas’Ge0rG, I’d like to nominate Jingle Encrypted Transport for Future Things
Ge0rGjonas’: if JFT is an advanced feature, is S5B advanced-advanced?
Danieli'd prefer to have http upload instead of jft
Ge0rGDaniel: that'll be in Core IM
Zashvcard4, deprecate vcard-temp?
jonas’Ge0rG, good point, S5B should be honoruable mention, but don’t require it for advanced
Ge0rGjonas’: there is no column for honorable mentions
Danieli hear cool use webrtc these days as transport
jonas’Ge0rG, "Future Things"? ;)
Danielbut i'm not cool
Ge0rGI'm pondering whether to add 0066 in "File Upload"
jonas’Ge0rG, I was thinking about that, too
Ge0rGit's tribal knowledge, so better have it in there
jonas’true
jubalhhas joined
andyhas joined
Ge0rGjonas’: added all your feedback to #841
DanielGe0rG: I'm sort of against bookmark conversion
Ge0rGDaniel: mind discussing that on-list?
jonas’yes please, I’m on my way out
DanielIf our changes to bookmarks 2 are accepted by the authors I hope to be able to deprecate conversion soon
Ge0rGI don't have a strong opinion on that, but it seemed useful to me.
Ge0rGDaniel: what's the migration path from private XML and PEP to Bookmarks2?
DanielGe0rG: bookmark 2 doing the conversion
DanielThe xep already hints at that. Our changes add features for that
Ge0rG> A server MAY choose to unify the bookmarks from both Private XML Storage (XEP-0049) [2] based and the current Bookmark Storage (XEP-0048) [1].
Ge0rGit's a hint only.
DanielGe0rG: yes
DanielFor now
Ge0rGDaniel: I will ask for an LC of CS2020 next week. Is the situation going to change until then?
zachhas left
zachhas joined
DanielProbably not
Ge0rGI need to redo 0411 anyway, because it is a server-thing.
Ge0rGI need to move 0411 anyway, because it is a server-thing.
Ge0rGno wait. Everything is good.
pdurbinhas joined
lovetox_has joined
adiaholichas joined
pdurbinhas left
Wojtekhas left
Wojtekhas joined
andyhas left
andyhas joined
adiaholichas left
kokonoehas left
kokonoehas joined
zachhas left
zachhas joined
Steve Killehas left
Steve Killehas joined
emushas left
kokonoehas left
adiaholichas joined
zachhas left
zachhas joined
stpeterhas joined
peterhas joined
pep.jonas’, it might actually be interesting to split CCG and the use-cases? I mean CCG is currently defined on "a string", but 3.2 and 3.3 could be different XEPs? and more could be added this way
pep.That's in reaction to Ge0rG's PR on 423, I find it pretty restrictive (not the right word) to name it the dep on 392 "User Name Coloring"
Shellhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
mukt2has left
mukt2has joined
Chobbeshas left
pep.That's in reaction to Ge0rG's PR on 423, I find it pretty restrictive (not the right word) to name the dep on 392 "User Name Coloring"
ajhas left
mukt2has left
Chobbeshas joined
mukt2has joined
Wojtekhas left
zachhas left
Ge0rGpep.: do you have a better name suggestion?
zachhas joined
rionhas left
pep.I'd be happy to keep that name if we had a xep that requires CCG and is specifically for user name coloring :p
pep.For CCG itself I'm not sure yeah
emushas joined
Nekithas left
pep.(And if it were split, it wouldn't make sense to include CCG itself anyway)
Zashread "GCC"
rionhas joined
zachhas left
zachhas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
adiaholichas left
waqashas joined
mukt2has left
mukt2has joined
jonas’Zash, it’s even more confusing if you also are familiar with GGC, which is the Garbage Collector implementation GCC uses internally (while compiling)
zachhas left
zachhas joined
Seve@_@
ZashThe number of [GC]{3} is too damn high!
lorddavidiiihas left
jonas’I think there’s also a dithering algorithm or something like that which is in that space of names
andyhas left
andyhas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
waqashas left
Chobbeshas left
Chobbeshas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
pdurbinhas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
zachhas left
zachhas joined
j.rhas left
eevvoorhas joined
pdurbinhas left
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
zachhas left
zachhas joined
Ge0rGAnd, probably too obvious, the CCC.
xalekhas joined
!XSF_Martinhas left
j.rhas joined
Nekithas joined
Chobbeshas left
mukt2has left
mukt2has joined
!XSF_Martinhas joined
zachhas left
zachhas joined
Wojtekhas joined
Chobbeshas joined
goffihas joined
Yagizahas left
stpeterhas left
peterhas left
j.rhas left
zachhas left
zachhas joined
stpeterhas joined
peterhas joined
kokonoehas joined
adiaholichas joined
jonas’mildly amusing: I just found this (<https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/51948/is-it-okay-to-normalize-unicode-passwords-with-nfc-nfd>) stackexchange question I wrote five years ago. I love the sentence:
> I found that there is a stringprep (RFC 3454) profile called SASLprep (RFC 4013) which is appearantly used for passwords and usernames in some protocols.