XSF Discussion - 2019-11-12

  1. mimi89999 has left

  2. mimi89999 has joined

  3. mimi89999 has left

  4. mimi89999 has joined

  5. mimi89999 has left

  6. mimi89999 has joined

  7. mimi89999 has left

  8. pdurbin has joined

  9. mimi89999 has joined

  10. pdurbin has left

  11. debacle has left

  12. alexis has left

  13. alexis has joined

  14. kokonoe has left

  15. kokonoe has joined

  16. remko has joined

  17. kokonoe has left

  18. nyco has joined

  19. neshtaxmpp has left

  20. neshtaxmpp has joined

  21. Chobbes has joined

  22. remko has left

  23. kokonoe has joined

  24. krauq has left

  25. krauq has joined

  26. murabito has left

  27. Daniel has left

  28. kokonoe has left

  29. kokonoe has joined

  30. mukt2 has joined

  31. pdurbin has joined

  32. murabito has joined

  33. kokonoe has left

  34. kokonoe has joined

  35. arc has left

  36. arc has joined

  37. alexis has left

  38. kokonoe has left

  39. waqas has left

  40. waqas has joined

  41. arc has left

  42. arc has joined

  43. murabito has left

  44. kokonoe has joined

  45. murabito has joined

  46. kokonoe has left

  47. Daniel has joined

  48. mukt2 has left

  49. mukt2 has joined

  50. alexis has joined

  51. mukt2 has left

  52. mukt2 has joined

  53. kokonoe has joined

  54. mukt2 has left

  55. mukt2 has joined

  56. kokonoe has left

  57. remko has joined

  58. mukt2 has left

  59. mukt2 has joined

  60. mukt2 has left

  61. mukt2 has joined

  62. pdurbin has left

  63. mukt2 has left

  64. Nekit has joined

  65. mukt2 has joined

  66. Chobbes has left

  67. mukt2 has left

  68. mukt2 has joined

  69. larma has left

  70. Yagiza has joined

  71. remko has left

  72. larma has joined

  73. remko has joined

  74. kokonoe has joined

  75. lorddavidiii has joined

  76. kokonoe has left

  77. kokonoe has joined

  78. andy has left

  79. andy has joined

  80. mukt2 has left

  81. pdurbin has joined

  82. mukt2 has joined

  83. waqas has left

  84. mukt2 has left

  85. pdurbin has left

  86. mukt2 has joined

  87. Tobias has joined

  88. DebXWoody has left

  89. DebXWoody has joined

  90. Daniel has left

  91. alexis has left

  92. mukt2 has left

  93. Daniel has joined

  94. kokonoe has left

  95. alexis has joined

  96. LNJ has joined

  97. wurstsalat has joined

  98. remko has left

  99. mukt2 has joined

  100. mukt2 has left

  101. kokonoe has joined

  102. kokonoe has left

  103. lorddavidiii has left

  104. kokonoe has joined

  105. mukt2 has joined

  106. LNJ has left

  107. karoshi has joined

  108. lorddavidiii has joined

  109. !XSF_Martin has left

  110. !XSF_Martin has joined

  111. mukt2 has left

  112. lorddavidiii has left

  113. mukt2 has joined

  114. lorddavidiii has joined

  115. rion has left

  116. rion has joined

  117. sonny has joined

  118. Zash has joined

  119. mukt2 has left

  120. pdurbin has joined

  121. remko has joined

  122. Steve Kille has left

  123. mukt2 has joined

  124. jubalh has joined

  125. remko has left

  126. remko has joined

  127. remko has left

  128. adiaholic has joined

  129. COM8 has joined

  130. pdurbin has left

  131. kokonoe has left

  132. kokonoe has joined

  133. Steve Kille has joined

  134. COM8 has left

  135. Dele (Mobile) has joined

  136. Dele (Mobile) has left

  137. winfried has left

  138. winfried has joined

  139. winfried has left

  140. winfried has joined

  141. Dele (Mobile) has joined

  142. winfried has left

  143. winfried has joined

  144. mukt2 has left

  145. mukt2 has joined

  146. adiaholic has left

  147. adiaholic has joined

  148. DebXWoody has left

  149. adiaholic has left

  150. adiaholic has joined

  151. neshtaxmpp has left

  152. DebXWoody has joined

  153. بشير has joined

  154. karoshi has left

  155. karoshi has joined

  156. kokonoe has left

  157. kokonoe has joined

  158. pep.

    Can somebody from board add an item in the trello board (doesn't seem like I'm able to?) "Who is webteam. How to get in"

  159. Ge0rG

    what's webteam?

  160. pep.

    I heard rumours of a team handling xsf/xmpp.org. That's what I'm told when I want to push things there, unless jonas or guus merge my stuff because they have rights for $reasons

  161. winfried has left

  162. winfried has joined

  163. Zash

    Not the same as commteam?

  164. Zash

    So many teams

  165. mukt2 has left

  166. pep.

    Apparently not, otherwise nyco would have rights to push and he didn't, for the last newsletter

  167. jonas’

    I’m also in no team except editor and for some reason I got +w on the repo

  168. jonas’

    it might’ve been an instance of "at the right place at the right time"

  169. Seve

    I don't think there's a strict rule about this, right now. Don't you have access as well, pep.?

  170. nyco

    pep. https://trello.com/c/PqY2mHjl/372-who-is-webteam-how-to-get-in

  171. pep.

    nyco, thanks

  172. pep.

    Seve, I don't. I don't especially want them, I just want to clarify the situation, know who I can ask etc.

  173. mukt2 has joined

  174. jubalh has left

  175. murabito has left

  176. adiaholic has left

  177. mukt2 has left

  178. murabito has joined

  179. winfried has left

  180. winfried has joined

  181. mukt2 has joined

  182. winfried has left

  183. winfried has joined

  184. edhelas has left

  185. edhelas has joined

  186. vanitasvitae has left

  187. vanitasvitae has joined

  188. pdurbin has joined

  189. LNJ has joined

  190. mukt2 has left

  191. adiaholic has joined

  192. jubalh has joined

  193. mukt2 has joined

  194. pdurbin has left

  195. winfried has left

  196. winfried has joined

  197. adiaholic has left

  198. debacle has joined

  199. mukt2 has left

  200. winfried has left

  201. winfried has joined

  202. Syndace has left

  203. mukt2 has joined

  204. eevvoor has joined

  205. mukt2 has left

  206. LNJ has left

  207. kokonoe has left

  208. mukt2 has joined

  209. kokonoe has joined

  210. Tobias has left

  211. Tobias has joined

  212. Wojtek has joined

  213. Syndace has joined

  214. mukt2 has left

  215. mukt2 has joined

  216. neshtaxmpp has joined

  217. LNJ has joined

  218. pdurbin has joined

  219. ralphm

    There are several GitHub teams associated with the xmpp.org repo, including one called 'Web' and one called 'XMPP Comms Team'. nyco is in the latter and should have write access with that.

  220. ralphm

    If not, you can take this up with iteam (e.g. Kev), and I don't think has to be discussed in a Board meeting.

  221. ralphm

    pep.: ^

  222. Kev

    But not e.g. Kev, please. e.g. MattJ :)

  223. MattJ


  224. pep.

    "how to get in" doesn't have to be discussed in a board meeting?

  225. MattJ

    I think some clarification is possibly needed, that doesn't necessarily mean a board meeting is needed

  226. ralphm

    not really, everyone in comms should have access

  227. pep.

    So comms is the "web" team?

  228. ralphm

    and if not, MattJ can set you up.

  229. pep.

    (that is, the one with access to xsf/xmpp.org?)

  230. ralphm

    There are additional people in the "web" team, which are not necessarily in the comms team.

  231. pep.


  232. pep.

    And who. I can't see it from here

  233. ralphm

    Because e.g. Guus might want to write on the website as a Board member.

  234. pep.

    Fair enough, but this is not explained anywhere

  235. pep.

    That's what I'm asking for

  236. ralphm

    https://github.com/orgs/xsf/teams should have an overview, but I don't know who can see that.

  237. pep.

    I only see board and editors

  238. MattJ

    The teams are marked as "secret" for some reason

  239. ralphm

    Out for lunch now, sorry

  240. MattJ

    There may be a good reason for that, Github's auth/permissions can be frustrating, but I don't know

  241. pdurbin has left

  242. Guus

    There really hasn't been any process to add people to the GitHub webteam, other than be invited by existing members. To the best of my knowledge, there is no intentional overlap with XSF workteams and the GitHub webteam.

  243. pep.

    MattJ, If possible, I'd ask for this to be changed to public

  244. MattJ

    I can't say I didn't see that coming :)

  245. Kev

    I'm trying to remember if I know what the reason is.

  246. Guus

    If anything, the github webteam can probably be clean up.

  247. MattJ

    I can imagine one possible explanation being that people don't necessarily want team associations showing up on their Github profiles

  248. pep.

    This makes the whole thing very opaque though

  249. Guus

    Maybe clean up, ask the remaining team for concerns, and make (not) public based on their feedback?

  250. pep.

    Nobody knows who can push

  251. pep.

    Or why they got commit rights in the first place

  252. Kev

    pep.: I think a clear list of who is (apart from iteam) allowed to push content to the website would be sensible.

  253. pep.


  254. Kev

    I don't think that making the github teams public is necessarily the way to do that.

  255. pep.

    It's the best way to keep both lists in sync

  256. pep.

    But ok

  257. Kev

    I also think that it doesn't matter, to some extent, as long as PRs are getting reviewed often enough. When contributing to most projects one doesn't try to find out who has commit access, they just send in PRs.

  258. Guus

    Having commteam members gain privileges to do reviewing of the public website does make sense to me.

  259. pep.

    We have work teams though, I didn't get editor rights until I got in there, and I wouldn't have expected to get them if I hadn't been accepted in the team

  260. Kev

    Guus: They have, no?

  261. Guus

    the way how XEPs are managed is a lot more structured than how our public website is.

  262. Kev

    As far as I can see, commteam has write access to both xmpp.org and xsf-tools.

  263. pep.

    I'm happy wherever the responsability of commiting to xsf/xmpp.org falls to, I just want it to be explicit (and it isn't atm)

  264. Guus

    Kev oh - that very well could be the case. I didn't check.

  265. Kev

    As far as I can see, iteam (although not expecting to use it for content) and commteam having write access to the website is sensible.

  266. Guus

    upon inspection: I don't think that commteam has access

  267. Guus

    I can't see everything

  268. Kev

    I think giving access beyond that should be a question for Board, because I don't think we should be giving out the ability to speak on behalf of the XSF (which is what the website is) arbitrarily.

  269. MattJ

    Strange, I see the same as Kev and ralphm - commteam has write access to the repo

  270. Guus

    but I don't htink that nyco has access, for example, nor has seve.

  271. Guus

    Oh, then I'm missing stuff

  272. Kev

    Permission level: Write Can read, clone, and push to this repository. Can also manage issues and pull requests.

  273. Guus

    which is entirely possible

  274. Kev

    Guus is not a member of the commteam, incidentally.

  275. Kev

    That's JC, Nyco, Seve and Winifried.

  276. Guus


  277. Guus

    nope i'm not.

  278. Guus

    Don't let me confuse people - you guys are in a better position to see what's what than me.

  279. Kev goes back to work stuffs.

  280. MattJ

    My proposal would be to drop the 'web' team, and stick to actual well-defined teams

  281. pep.

    MattJ, +1

  282. MattJ

    and add any other teams that it makes sense to have access

  283. MattJ

    such as iteam, maybe board

  284. Kev

    MattJ: I think I'd propose to have an explicit web team, same as our other teams.

  285. Guus

    I don't care much either way.

  286. MattJ

    Congrats, write the charter, etc. :)

  287. pep.

    I actually don't care either way

  288. Guus

    I'll follow Kev's good example and go do works stuff now.

  289. pep.


  290. Kev

    But I CBA to do anything about it, and it mostly depends whether people on webteam and not on comms would want to do things.

  291. Kev &

  292. MattJ

    I don't see why we would trust someone to manage our website and not trust them to do other public-facing stuff on behalf of the XSF

  293. MattJ

    i.e. why anyone who works on the website shouldn't be part of commteam

  294. MattJ

    or another team with reasonable grounds for access

  295. lskdjf has joined

  296. Zash

    Sounds reasonable.

  297. lskdjf has left

  298. adiaholic has joined

  299. Chobbes has joined

  300. adiaholic has left

  301. adiaholic has joined

  302. ralphm


  303. winfried has left

  304. winfried has joined

  305. winfried has left

  306. winfried has joined

  307. ralphm

    FWIW, the reason that the "Web" team exists is an historical artifact, from when there was no comms team and the website was overhauled.

  308. ralphm

    I agree it would be useful to just map the XSFs formal Work Teams, Council, and Board, as GitHub Teams as the basis for access.

  309. ralphm

    I also don't see why they'd need to be secret, as team membership is already made public on our website.

  310. kokonoe has left

  311. Neustradamus

    Problem? https://xmpp.org/

  312. ralphm

    Neustradamus: works for me, but while you are here, please give me admin access to the LinkedIn org for the XSF.

  313. Guus

    https://xmpp.org/ works for me

  314. Zash

    Vauge question?

  315. kokonoe has joined

  316. ralphm

    Neustradamus: I think I've asked often enough by now.

  317. Neustradamus

    I have a blank page for https://xmpp.org/

  318. Guus

    > I have a blank page for https://xmpp.org/ I suspect that this is a problem local to you. It works fine for others, including me. I've even tried an incognito tab.

  319. Neustradamus

    Cache problem, sorry

  320. ralphm

    Neustradamus: did you see my message?

  321. Neustradamus

    It is possible to update the logo? - https://twitter.com/xmpp - https://wiki.xmpp.org/images/xmpp.png - https://xmpp.org/theme/images/xmpp-logo.svg and other too (regenerate from the last .SVG) - Memberbot - Other places

  322. ralphm

    Neustradamus: Is is possible to respond to my request for LinkedIn Org admin?

  323. ralphm

    Neustradamus: Is it possible to respond to my request for LinkedIn Org admin?

  324. Guus

    Neustradamus I can't fix 'other places' if I don't know where those are. 🙂

  325. moparisthebest has left

  326. waqas has joined

  327. moparisthebest has joined

  328. waqas has left

  329. Guus

    Hmm, I don't think I'm an admin of the XMPP team on Twitter (which I think means that I can't change the avatar there)

  330. adiaholic has left

  331. adiaholic has joined

  332. Guus

    Please keep talking here, Neustradamus, and not in private. I know where the last updated version of the logo is.

  333. Guus

    But without access, I can't change it on the systems that it needs to be changed on.

  334. ralphm

    Guus: I don't think that Tweetdeck allows profile changes like that, you'd have to log into Twitter with the account credentials directly.

  335. Guus

    ralphm which is another reason why I can't do that. I don't have the account credentials.

  336. mukt2 has left

  337. mukt2 has joined

  338. ralphm

    Guus: Kev does. Twitter is not designed for multiple people managing a single account, oddly enough.

  339. Neustradamus

    Guus: - https://github.com/xsf and repositories

  340. ralphm

    Neustradamus: a response to my message, please?

  341. Kev

    I'm not paying attention here, but if you need something please mail ralphm / Guus and I'll try to sort.

  342. ralphm

    Kev: ok, thanks!

  343. Guus

    The logo on https://github.com/xsf seems OK to me?

  344. Guus

    I don't think that individual repositories can have logos.

  345. APach has left

  346. Guus

    (I've emailed Kev with the Twitter request)

  347. ralphm

    You can add a logo that'll show up when a repo is mentioned by URL on social media (like Twitter, Slack), but we don't have that right now, and I don't think that's important either.

  348. wurstsalat

    Guus, is this the current one? I looked for one recently for gajim's website https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:XMPP_logo.svg

  349. Guus

    That seems to be correct, yes. I'm always using the one that's on the top-left corner of https://xmpp.org

  350. Guus


  351. Guus

    which is easy to remember: https://xmpp.org/theme/images/xmpp-logo.svg

  352. Neustradamus

    Guus: there was a little change after the previous, it was not the exactly same at right and left: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:XMPP_logo.svg

  353. Guus

    Oh, Converse doesn't like me injecting links

  354. ralphm

    Guus: looks fine here

  355. pdurbin has joined

  356. Guus

    github logo replaced

  357. Guus

    Can someone do it on LinkedIn?

  358. adiaholic has left

  359. Neustradamus

    From XMPP.org: https://i.ibb.co/vcqmc8b/xmpp-logo-xsf-test.png From Commons: https://i.ibb.co/Zgsjk3T/XMPP-logo-xsf-test.png

  360. Neustradamus

    Guus: Do you the difference? :)

  361. pdurbin has left

  362. Guus

    Please provide a PR to fix the logo on xmpp.org.

  363. pep.

    ralphm: you have to adopt the Neustradamus technique to get him to reply to you

  364. ralphm

    Neustradamus: Guus makes a good point. If you'd stop ignoring me, I'd also be able to help him.

  365. pep.

    ralphm: fwiw once your rights are sorted out, I'd prefer this to get to whatever team it is appropriate rather than individuals

  366. ralphm

    pep.: naturally

  367. ralphm

    For every service that supports this.

  368. ralphm

    (unlike Twitter, ugh)

  369. Steve Kille has left

  370. mukt2 has left

  371. remko has joined

  372. remko has left

  373. waqas has joined

  374. Chobbes has left

  375. waqas has left

  376. intosi

    Neustradamus: please respond to ralphm's request.

  377. !XSF_Martin

    pep.: > ralphm: you have to adopt the Neustradamus technique to get him to reply to you What's that? You have to do a special dance?

  378. intosi

    while (true) { askSameQuestion(); sleep(random()%3600); /* this is where a sentinel would be implemented */ }

  379. eevvoor has left

  380. kokonoe has left

  381. kokonoe has joined

  382. waqas has joined

  383. Nekit has left

  384. Nekit has joined

  385. Guus

    Neustradamus do you have a PNG version of the correct logo?

  386. Neustradamus has left

  387. moparisthebest

    you can generate one given the SVG, with inkscape on the command line at least

  388. Neustradamus has joined

  389. Guus

    Yeah, which is going to get me in trouble because I missed pixel. I'd rather have it from him, to avoid any confusion.

  390. Steve Kille has joined

  391. Chobbes has joined

  392. mukt2 has joined

  393. بشير has left

  394. eevvoor has joined

  395. j.r has left

  396. Chobbes has left

  397. Chobbes has joined

  398. mukt2 has left

  399. Shell has joined

  400. j.r has joined

  401. mukt2 has joined

  402. Ge0rG

    Wikipedia also lists https://www.livejournal.com/support/faq/270.html as an XMPP deployment

  403. Steve Kille has left

  404. mukt2 has left

  405. Maranda

    Link Mauve, would there be a case in which eme can be used with messages using multiple encryption formats?

  406. Link Mauve

    Hmm, hopefully not, but I could see a made up case where you’d have full stanza encryption around (flagged with EME) and inside another kind of encryption, also flagged with EME.

  407. Link Mauve

    But those are two different “message” containers.

  408. Link Mauve

    Do you have another possible usecase?

  409. adiaholic has joined

  410. Maranda

    Link Mauve, I was just thinking that someone could really just encrypt one message using both openpgp and omemo for example

  411. Link Mauve

    Hmm, no, because they both can only encrypt the body.

  412. Maranda

    That would mean multiple eme elements would be needed I think? The schema doesn't limit instances either

  413. Link Mauve

    OTR-encrypted in OMEMO or OpenPGP might be a thing though, although I expect no one sane would ever do that.

  414. mukt2 has joined

  415. Link Mauve

    Can we limit instances of a payload in a message, in the schema?

  416. Ge0rG

    Link Mauve: yes we can. But should we?

  417. Yagiza has left

  418. Yagiza has joined

  419. thomas8028 has joined

  420. Ge0rG

    What's wrong with having a body encrypted both ways? Besides of having the possibility to sneak in two different messages, and that the resulting security is the worst of both.

  421. Maranda

    Link Mauve, I meant that one message stanza can contain both one omemo element and one openpgp element for example, to encrypt/sign whatever the same message content for something supporting one or the other

  422. Ge0rG

    The OpenPGP encrypted payload body would read: "I sent you an OMEMO encrypted message but your client doesn’t seem to support that. Find more information on https://conversations.im/omemo"

  423. Half-Shot has joined

  424. Half-Shot has left

  425. Nekit has left

  426. Link Mauve

    Ge0rG, let’s rot13 encrypt twice with two EME tags for additional security!

  427. Maranda

    Ge0rG, that's not what I meant either.

  428. Link Mauve

    Maranda, sounds like an amazing can of worms.

  429. Ge0rG

    Link Mauve: according to XEP-0419?

  430. Link Mauve

    Ge0rG, yes.

  431. Maranda

    Ge0rG, I meant encrypted using xep-0374 not the legacy format

  432. Ge0rG

    Maranda: did you mean something different than what I wrote in my last non-sarcastic message?

  433. Maranda

    which has its own element and doesn't use <body />

  434. Maranda


  435. Maranda

    so one message in that case could be encrypted using... both?

  436. thomas8028 has left

  437. Ge0rG

    Maranda: you could put an <openpgp> element alongside an OMEMO <encrypted> element, and those might even contain ciphertexts of the same plaintext body

  438. Maranda

    Ge0rG, whatever.. I'm just trying to understand if that's a possibility I should take in account or not for MAM if that wasn't clear and if 2 eme elements can be appended to a stanza to advertise both encryptions

  439. flow

    Unless I hear a very convincing use-case for using multiple encryption mechanisms within the same stanza, I would probably recommend to not consider it. How many e-mail clients are capable of creating mails with OpenPGP and S/MIME parts?

  440. mukt2 has left

  441. Ge0rG

    Maranda: 0380 does not forbid multiple <encryption> elements

  442. Ge0rG

    Maranda: other than that, you should retain all message elements in MAM

  443. mukt2 has joined

  444. Ge0rG

    _maybe_ with the exception of well-known noise elements, like chat states

  445. alexis has left

  446. Maranda

    Ge0rG, for now it's very convenient to do otherwise... regarding retaining all elements.

  447. Maranda

    but I'm reviewing that code right now so.

  448. Ge0rG

    Maranda: I know that path. It leads into major pain later on.

  449. pdurbin has joined

  450. winfried has left

  451. winfried has joined

  452. pdurbin has left

  453. mukt2 has left

  454. mukt2 has joined

  455. eevvoor has left

  456. winfried has left

  457. winfried has joined

  458. Yagiza has left

  459. Yagiza has joined

  460. kokonoe has left

  461. kokonoe has joined

  462. winfried has left

  463. winfried has joined

  464. mukt2 has left

  465. mukt2 has joined

  466. kokonoe has left

  467. Nekit has joined

  468. kokonoe has joined

  469. Nekit has left

  470. Chobbes has left

  471. kokonoe has left

  472. waqas has left

  473. waqas has joined

  474. winfried has left

  475. winfried has joined

  476. kokonoe has joined

  477. winfried has left

  478. winfried has joined

  479. Chobbes has joined

  480. mukt2 has left

  481. kokonoe has left

  482. mukt2 has joined

  483. sonny has left

  484. kokonoe has joined

  485. adiaholic has left

  486. Maranda


  487. alameyo has left

  488. alameyo has joined

  489. adiaholic has joined

  490. lovetox has joined

  491. kokonoe has left

  492. kokonoe has joined

  493. jubalh has left

  494. lovetox has left

  495. lovetox has joined

  496. lovetox has left

  497. lovetox has joined

  498. lovetox has left

  499. lovetox has joined

  500. lovetox has left

  501. winfried has left

  502. winfried has joined

  503. mukt2 has left

  504. mukt2 has joined

  505. lovetox has joined

  506. adiaholic has left

  507. Chobbes has left

  508. mukt2 has left

  509. mukt2 has joined

  510. winfried has left

  511. jubalh has joined

  512. winfried has joined

  513. andrey.g has left

  514. jubalh has left

  515. Chobbes has joined

  516. Steve Kille has joined

  517. Yagiza has left

  518. Yagiza has joined

  519. sonny has joined

  520. matkor has left

  521. matkor has joined

  522. mukt2 has left

  523. mukt2 has joined

  524. debacle has left

  525. kokonoe has left

  526. kokonoe has joined

  527. rion has left

  528. rion has joined

  529. mukt2 has left

  530. goffi has joined

  531. Nekit has joined

  532. mukt2 has joined

  533. mukt2 has left

  534. Yagiza has left

  535. Nekit has left

  536. kokonoe has left

  537. pdurbin has joined

  538. j.r has left

  539. eevvoor has joined

  540. matkor has left

  541. matkor has joined

  542. j.r has joined

  543. kokonoe has joined

  544. j.r has left

  545. j.r has joined

  546. kokonoe has left

  547. pdurbin has left

  548. kokonoe has joined

  549. j.r has left

  550. j.r has joined

  551. alexis has joined

  552. jonas’ has left

  553. jonas’ has joined

  554. Wojtek has left

  555. Maranda has left

  556. Maranda has joined

  557. kokonoe has left

  558. andrey.g has joined

  559. kokonoe has joined

  560. Dele (Mobile) has left

  561. LNJ has left

  562. jubalh has joined

  563. kokonoe has left

  564. kokonoe has joined

  565. jubalh has left

  566. alexis has left

  567. andy has left

  568. mukt2 has joined

  569. lorddavidiii has left

  570. lorddavidiii has joined

  571. alexis has joined

  572. eevvoor has left

  573. winfried has left

  574. winfried has joined

  575. mukt2 has left

  576. pdurbin has joined

  577. kokonoe has left

  578. kokonoe has joined

  579. larma has left

  580. Tobias has left

  581. larma has joined

  582. pdurbin has left

  583. stpeter has joined

  584. david has left

  585. david has joined

  586. kokonoe has left

  587. goffi has left

  588. wurstsalat has left

  589. lovetox has left

  590. moparisthebest has left

  591. moparisthebest has joined

  592. kokonoe has joined

  593. kokonoe has left

  594. APach has joined

  595. debacle has joined

  596. jubalh has joined

  597. Tobias has joined