> MattJ> I think trying to remove it from the protocol this way is a bad idea
> Remove it from the UI, sure
I agree.
pep.
And yeah extensions could be useful, so we don't have to invent a new bookmark standard each time we want a new feature in there. So we not have an extensible protocol somewhere for that already?✎
pep.
And yeah extensions could be useful, so we don't have to invent a new bookmark standard each time we want a new feature in there. Do we not have an extensible protocol somewhere for that already? ✏
Zash
Extensible Bookmarks (I promise, this time for sure!) aka Bookmarks 4
Zash
And then Boomarks 5 which is actually Extensible Rosters?
archas left
archas joined
betahas left
wurstsalathas left
betahas joined
matkorhas left
betahas left
betahas joined
Shellhas left
alexishas left
kokonoehas left
mukt2has joined
betahas left
betahas joined
mukt2has left
kokonoehas joined
alexishas joined
pdurbinhas joined
betahas left
pdurbinhas left
archas left
archas joined
betahas joined
alexishas left
alexishas joined
archas left
archas joined
betahas left
betahas joined
waqashas joined
adiaholichas joined
pdurbinhas joined
lskdjfhas left
andyhas joined
betahas left
betahas joined
betahas left
Nekithas joined
sjaakhas left
sjaakhas joined
sjaakhas left
sjaakhas joined
betahas joined
calvinhas joined
betahas left
subpubhas left
subpubhas joined
betahas joined
betahas left
calvinhas left
calvinhas joined
sjaakhas left
sjaakhas joined
sjaakhas left
sjaakhas joined
betahas joined
andrey.ghas joined
kokonoehas left
kokonoehas joined
matkorhas joined
calvinhas left
matkorhas left
sjaakhas left
sjaakhas joined
sjaakhas left
sjaakhas joined
matkorhas joined
betahas left
betahas joined
archas left
archas joined
alexishas left
alexishas joined
archas left
archas joined
subpubhas left
subpubhas joined
subpubhas left
Lancehas left
mukt2has joined
mukt2has left
betahas left
betahas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
DebXWoodyhas left
DebXWoodyhas joined
betahas left
j.rhas left
betahas joined
kokonoehas left
SpaceFreak aka Tracerhas joined
kokonoehas joined
DebXWoodyhas left
DebXWoodyhas joined
SpaceFreak aka Tracerhas left
SpaceFreak aka Tracerhas joined
strarhas joined
j.rhas joined
strarhas left
strarhas joined
strarhas left
strarhas joined
strarhas left
j.rhas left
j.rhas joined
Steve Killehas left
Tobiashas joined
j.rhas left
Steve Killehas joined
jubalhhas joined
SpaceFreak aka Tracerhas left
waqashas left
waqashas joined
matkorhas left
matkorhas joined
waqashas left
waqashas joined
waqashas left
waqashas joined
waqashas left
waqashas joined
waqashas left
waqashas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
waqashas left
waqashas joined
sjaakhas left
sjaakhas joined
sjaakhas left
sjaakhas joined
waqashas left
waqashas joined
Ge0rG
Yeah, we need to be able to put group chats into groups. Ideally the same groups as contacts!
waqashas left
waqashas joined
j.rhas joined
wurstsalathas joined
waqashas left
waqashas joined
!XSF_Martin
I'd like to be able to group groupchats. Or to channel channels or whatever the modern speech calls it…
waqashas left
waqashas joined
Kev
If only we had a place that we could store lists of grouped JIDs.
Kev
Under 3921, you could even include arbitrary extensions in there, although 6121 removed that (which I thought was a shame).
waqashas left
waqashas joined
betahas left
betahas joined
mukt2has joined
emushas joined
waqashas left
waqashas joined
karoshihas joined
waqashas left
waqashas joined
mukt2has left
waqashas left
waqashas joined
waqashas left
waqashas joined
waqashas left
waqashas joined
mathijshas left
mathijshas joined
Douglas Terabytehas left
waqashas left
waqashas joined
waqashas left
waqashas joined
kokonoehas left
waqashas left
waqashas joined
mathijshas left
mathijshas joined
kokonoehas joined
Douglas Terabytehas joined
sjaakhas left
sjaakhas joined
paulhas joined
sjaakhas left
sjaakhas joined
sjaakhas left
paulhas left
betahas left
sjaakhas joined
SpaceFreak aka Tracerhas joined
sjaakhas left
sjaakhas joined
SpaceFreak aka Tracerhas left
SpaceFreak aka Tracerhas joined
betahas joined
!XSF_Martinhas left
jubalhhas left
!XSF_Martinhas joined
!XSF_Martinhas left
!XSF_Martinhas joined
SpaceFreak aka Tracerhas left
paulhas joined
jubalhhas joined
!XSF_Martinhas left
!XSF_Martinhas joined
sjaakhas left
sjaakhas joined
kokonoehas left
jubalhhas left
sjaakhas left
sjaakhas joined
kokonoehas joined
DebXWoodyhas left
DebXWoodyhas joined
sjaakhas left
sjaakhas joined
sjaakhas left
sjaakhas joined
mathijshas left
mathijshas joined
DebXWoodyhas left
DebXWoodyhas joined
mathijshas left
mathijshas joined
kokonoehas left
kokonoehas joined
!XSF_Martinhas left
!XSF_Martinhas joined
debaclehas joined
betahas left
kokonoehas left
Ge0rG
Kev: probably because most implementations can't really handle those anyway, see above.
mathijshas left
mathijshas joined
lskdjfhas joined
kokonoehas joined
DebXWoodyhas left
DebXWoodyhas joined
Alexhas left
Alexhas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
flow
Ge0rG, right, Android's xpp3 does not has it, but you could potentially use an xpp3 implementation on Android that has it
betahas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
Ge0rG
Yay, bundling more libraries!
sjaakhas left
sjaakhas joined
emushas left
flow
well you could just implement the parser interface with xml roundtrip support in your codebase if you want to avoid bunding more libraries :-P
mathijshas left
mathijshas joined
sjaakhas left
Ge0rG
I've heard there is an NIH syndrome pandemic going on