XSF Discussion - 2020-01-29

Zash, you describe the situation in c2s, but xep225 talks about component connections. I think the intention is to use JIDs (bare dominpart jids in the case of components) at the TLS layer (e.g. the certificate's DNS SAN) and in the SASL layer when connecting a component to an xmpp server

although I could imagine that we could do/allow the same as we do with c2s connection for component connections and SASL, i.e. the the authzid does not strictly has to be JID (or a part of the JID), I am not sure if it's worth it as it potentially adds to confusion

flow, but it talks about connecting as a normal client at first

jonas’: votes submitted

\o/ ✏

dwd - are you getting my messages?

I'm getting errors back.

Oh. No, I'm not.

sigh

could you send me one please?

I received your 'blah'

but still get errors when trying to reply

Exclamation mark or question mark?

Blah?

not Blah!

I've sent you the stuff I wanted to send you by email now 🙂

dwd: I got the "Blah!" on my mobile

Zash, I am not sure it does (it talks about that the stream establishment is identical to c2s with the mentioned exceptions), and even if, does it matter?

How do I distinguish between the user 'component.example.com@example.com' and the component 'component.example.com' ?

Zash, good question, I assume the answer probably involves different ports

but xep225 sure could be calrified regarding this

XEP-0430 and XEP-0431 incoming

which is which??!?! 😃

uh-oh!

jonas’, PR for XEP-0431.

I can do that

timing

I still have the shells open

will do it

k

We need Hats!

Thanks.

Zash, "Has all the shells open" hat?

Editor Hat at least

dwd, merged & pushed

Thanks

so how does last call work?

i give my feedback and then authors have to respond to it?

Yes

For some definition of 'have to respond'

lovetox, they do not have to respond to it

they also could just vanish

They don't have to. But if they completely ignore feedback it won't make it to draft

depends if the voting body aggrees with the feedback

The holy text: <https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0001.xml#proposal>

> Once the consensus of the Standards SIG has been incorporated into the XEP and all issues of substance raised during the Last Call have been addressed by the XEP author or Document Shepherd

[editor asks council or such to vote]

lovetox, recent changes to xep1 also introduced the "Document Shepherd" role if the authors become inactive

yeah authors are not inactive here

i just wondered