There are lots of people in the editor team that are and have been inactive for some time now
lorddavidiiihas joined
moparisthebest
(agenda proposal: can I test authentication of mailing list by attempting to impersonate board member on board@ mailing list with a "test" message, not priority)
Guus
We're talking about these six? https://xmpp.org/about/xsf/editor-team
MattJ
I imagine so, yes
Guus
jonas’ reasoning makes sense to me. My suggestion would be for the team lead to reach out to members, see if they're interested in retaining their membership, and act accordingly.
MattJ
My proposal would be to simply ping each individual
pep.
Guus, yes. Effectively it's mostly jonas though. I joined not so long ago and I helped for some time. I know JC is helping here and there
MattJ
I trust people to step down who don't feel they are up to working on the team
Guus
I'd warn against removing power to help from people that do help, if only occasionally, but I'm happy for the team to make that judgement themselves.
pep.
MattJ, I'm not entirely sure about that, but if we ping them yes that seems more likely
pep.
I also doubt that's an issue of the editor team alone
MattJ
pep., I mean a simple "Do you still want to be on the Editors team?" is going to work 99.9% of the time
MattJ
Yes, likely so
mukt2has left
pep.
Infra also has.. 8 person
Zash
Also, there are no guarantees that the website is up to date
Guus
Let's have the leads of the teams that are interesting in reducing the size of teams initiate this - not board.
Guus
Zash more reason for team leads to drive this.
Guus
as MattJ mentioned, it should be fairly simple
MattJ
Guus, *is* there a team lead for editors?
MattJ
> Members of the work team shall be selected by the XMPP Council after a call for volunteers from among the XSF membership, and shall be approved by the XSF Board of Directors.
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
pep.
I doubt there is an official one. But de facto I'd say jonas’ :)
Guus
MattJ I assumed every WT had a lead - I might be very wrong - but as jonas’ is a defacto team lead...
MattJ
I don't know if it's fair to dump extra undefined responsibility on Jonas as a reward for all the work he's been doing :)
pep.
:D
lorddavidiiihas left
pep.
We can start a which hu^W^Wthread on the list.
Guus
Bweh. Anyone can ask people of they're interested in remaining in the team.
MattJ
Agreed
Guus
that takes less effort than what it takes to have the discussion we're having now 🙂
pep.
And this should probably be somewhat automated
MattJ
We may want to update the charter though to indicate some process for removal, it essentially only says how to add people to the team
pep.
Having people renew their affiliation to teams or sth(?)
MattJ
But e.g. if council were to review annually, that would suffice
Guus
let's not overcomplicate things
pep.
council?
Guus
the nuisance is minor
MattJ
pep., the charter says council are responsible for selecting team members, yes
mukt2has joined
pep.
Ah, editors
sonnyhas left
MattJ
Yes
MattJ
I'm also fine with not over-complicating things, I can ping people who are listed on the team currently
pep.
Ok. let's just do this for now
Guus
we can also have one blanket email to the list
pep.
"Please people who are inactive and not following the life of the XSF, show yourself" :P
Guus
"if you're a listed member of the team, please consider if you want to remain listed <for reasons Jonas wrote down>"
MattJ
Problem: the inactive people may not be paying attention :)
lorddavidiiihas joined
sonnyhas joined
Guus
Those on the editors list are
Kev
I did send out a 'who's still active?' mail a year ago, I just didn't get around to purging.
Guus
Kev, Peter, someone named pep. ...
Guus
jc is, flow is.
Guus
Kev do you have the results somewhere?
Guus
we might as well start with those.
Kev
Probably, somewhere.
Kev
Won't be digging it out this week, at least though, I'm on leave.
MattJ
Results from a year ago may no longer be accurate, so we might as well just do it again
Guus
Agreed.
pep.
Ok MattJ proposed to ping people directly to see if they're still ok. MattJ are you ok taking this on?
Guus
lets do that.
MattJ
I'll present a list of inactive people by next week
MattJ
One way or another
Kev
I suspect the list of people who replied last time, plus anyone who's joined since, is probably fine, but w/e.
MattJ
Bored now :)
pep.
Thanks
debaclehas left
pep.
moparisthebest, I'd say your item is for iteam
pep.
3. AOB?
MattJ
moparisthebest, representing iteam then, I'm fine with you sending a test email
Guus
hey iteam is hyjacking our meeting! 🙂
Guus
I have no AOB
MattJ
No AOB here
pep.
Ok let's close then.
pep.
Thanks all
Guus
Thanks!
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
MattJ
moparisthebest, please just make clear in the email itself that it is not authentic
MattJ
by e.g. linking to this discussion
moparisthebest
thanks, yea a link to this is a good idea, I was definitely going for "test this is only a test, please ignore" etc :)
pep.
I don't think you particularly need authorization to try this kind of things out. I already know you can make me say weird things via email by impersonating me :P
right, well if impersonation is possible, anyone can do it rather anonymously, I just prefer asking first :)
MattJ
Yep, I appreciate that :)
calvinhas joined
MattJ
Kev, flow: you're both here but offline in my roster (I daren't dig into why) - but in case you didn't get my message, feel free to let me know here whether you'd like to continue as a member of the Editors team
Kevhas left
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
Zash
Kev: How do we get you to renew your cert?
mukt2has left
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
gavhas left
raghavgururajanhas left
raghavgururajanhas joined
gavhas joined
pdurbinhas joined
andrey.ghas joined
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
pdurbinhas left
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
mukt2has joined
lovetoxhas joined
mukt2has left
calvinhas left
marchas joined
ellenorhas left
ellenorhas joined
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
archas left
mukt2has joined
serge90has left
archas joined
serge90has joined
Marandahas left
Marandahas joined
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
eevvoorhas left
mukt2has left
Kevhas joined
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
Kev
MattJ: Aye.
Kev
Zash: Time Turner?
Kev
Needs me to bother with changing everything around so that the webserver and XMPP server run on the same machine, so I can LE web stuff and use the certs for XMPP.
Kev
As I don't particularly want to keep paying for certs.
Zash
I'm quite happy with DNS based challenges FWIW.
Shellhas left
curenhas left
mukt2has joined
krauqhas left
mukt2has left
mukt2has joined
krauqhas joined
moparisthebest
Kev, so they don't have to be on the same machine, and the 2 machines don't even need to communicate if you go this way (requires 1-time change to your HTTP server) https://github.com/acmesh-official/acme.sh/wiki/Stateless-Mode
moparisthebest
but yes, I also recently switched to DNS based challenges instead because I wanted wildcard certs
jonas’
(*) if you run nginx
adiaholichas left
moparisthebest
jonas’, I assume any other webserver could do similar?
adiaholichas joined
moparisthebest
maybe you'd need some script/cgi for some
jonas’
not sure how to make apache return a static string, but I guess I’d simply put the file somewhere
jonas’
ah, no, it needs to include something from the request, meh
moparisthebest
yep, copy a bit of the request into the response
mukt2has left
moparisthebest
and you don't have to use acme.sh with this, any acme client with http challenge support (all of them) works
mukt2has joined
marchas left
Steve Killehas left
mukt2has left
Steve Killehas joined
pdurbinhas joined
SubPubhas left
pdurbinhas left
mukt2has joined
archas left
archas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
!XSF_Martinhas left
!XSF_Martinhas joined
davidhas left
rionhas left
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
archas left
archas joined
davidhas joined
pep.
https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/894#event-3056122474 hah github. "This PR fixes xsf/xeps#894 for smack-omemo." and poof the issue on an unrelated repo is closed. I'm not sure I like the rules of closing etc.
pep.
Probably because flow has rights on both?
j.rhas left
j.rhas joined
moparisthebest
what
moparisthebest
oh, well I certainly hope so otherwise that's a pretty big (security?) bug
Yagizahas left
Nekithas left
mukt2has left
mukt2has joined
Syndacehas left
Syndacehas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
Dele Olajidehas left
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
mukt2has left
Marchas left
Marchas joined
Marchas left
Marchas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
Syndacehas left
Syndacehas joined
Danielhas left
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
winfriedhas left
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
winfriedhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
marchas joined
paulhas left
mukt2has joined
debaclehas joined
waqashas joined
Nekithas joined
paulhas joined
mukt2has left
marchas left
mukt2has joined
lorddavidiiihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
mukt2has left
jonas’
flow does have +w on xeps
jonas’
he’s an editor after all.
jonas’
it’s more or less a feature that you can cross-project close issues
jonas’
but I wasn’t aware that this also holds for PRs
jonas’
because closing a PR by merging a different one with the keyword "fixes" is somewhat odd
Zash
It did say "fixes xsf/xeps#nnnn", so I guess it made sense for someone somewhere to make it do that
jonas’
you can’t fix a PR
jonas’
you can fix an issue
jonas’
you can obsolete a PR
!XSF_Martin
Zash is defending github? 😳
jonas’
but not fix a PR
jonas’
it doesn’t make sense and I guess it’s an artifact of PRs and Issues being mostly the same thing on github
jonas’
(they share the same numberspace for example)
Zash
They're all probably aliases for "close(s|d)" tho
Zash
since there's no "fixed" issues either, they're closed
Marchas left
lorddavidiiihas left
LNJhas left
LNJhas joined
Alex__has left
lorddavidiiihas joined
Alex__has joined
mukt2has joined
Danielhas joined
mukt2has left
mukt2has joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
marchas joined
pep.
https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/2020-February/009120.html I just sent this, (scam) proposal to support sprints. Please give feedback
marchas left
curenhas joined
mukt2has left
marchas joined
LNJhas left
Marandahas left
Marandahas joined
Nekithas left
mukt2has joined
Tobiashas left
pdurbinhas joined
pdurbinhas left
mukt2has left
lorddavidiiihas left
adiaholichas left
archas left
archas joined
mukt2has joined
marchas left
lovetoxhas left
mukt2has left
kuvohhas joined
archas left
archas joined
kuvohhas left
mukt2has joined
kuvohhas joined
kuvohhas left
kuvohhas joined
kuvohhas left
vanitasvitae
The more you know :D
vanitasvitae
Stupid Github
marchas joined
mukt2has left
lovetoxhas joined
lovetoxhas left
emus
> https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/2020-February/009120.html I just sent this, (scam) proposal to support sprints. Please give feedback
Cool, I thinks thats very good. If thats official and decided I would put it to the wiki at least. maybe also the website