Daniel and Guus's emails on '198 almost made me spit my tea over my keyboard.
dwd
But also, yeah, Pando is 100% mobile at the moment and uses 198 resumption because Hospital Wifi is even worse than Guus's parents'.
Kev
That sounds like a pretty unanimous "I should be using DNS challenges". I'll look into it when I have some cycles - which is certainly not this week. Today is "playing Gloomhaven all day before doing night two of the show" day.
lskdjfhas joined
jonas’
Yes, you should be using DNS challenge
Kev
👍
eevvoorhas joined
mukt2has left
lorddavidiiihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
mukt2has joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
eevvoorhas left
LNJhas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
Maxhas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
savostinhas joined
pdurbinhas joined
mukt2has left
Maxhas joined
Maxhas left
Ellenor Malik
Jeans
mukt2has joined
nyco-2has left
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
Dele Olajidehas left
Maxhas joined
matkorhas left
matkorhas joined
krauqhas left
krauqhas joined
Maxhas left
Marchas left
Marchas joined
Dele Olajidehas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
pdurbinhas left
Maxhas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
Guus
dwd, if Pando is interested in selling my Parents' wifi to their customers as an upgrade, let me know.
mukt2has left
mukt2has joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
jonas’
I wonder what would happen if I made a MUC roon service *send* a presence-join to another MUC room
jonas’
from playing the scenario in my head, this might end up with a very bare bones bridge between the rooms
jonas’
all messages from the respectively "remote" room will appear under the same nickname
lorddavidiiihas left
fippo
dmuc or fmuc probably have lengthy xml examples for that
jonas’
are they based on that pattern?
Zash
Yes
Zash
At least one of them
jonas’
interesting
jonas’
I'd like to have a read-only aggregate feed of all the XSF MUCs and I was wondering on how to implement that
lorddavidiiihas joined
Alex__has left
LNJhas joined
Guus
jonas’ what you're suggesting would affect all users of the MUCs. Maybe aggregrate through archiving instead?
Zash
Poll MAM? Hm
jonas’
Guus: sure, I didn't mean to *implement* it that way
like fippo, what you suggested made me think of XEP-0289
Guus
should be feasible.
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
marchas joined
mukt2has left
winfriedhas left
Sevehas left
Vaulorhas left
winfriedhas joined
Sevehas joined
Vaulorhas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
dwd
jonas’, Don't you end up with FMUC, sort of?
mukt2has joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
dwd
jonas’, But also, it's unclear to me you could hold an archive of someone else's room within GDPR. Looks very sketchy on that basis.
moparisthebest
so just have someone in US or UK do it
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
dwd
moparisthebest, UK is covered by GDPR anyway, but besides, it's not quite the point.
Guus
mopar might be referring to a news snippet that I've read this morning
dwd
Guus, Google thing? Yeah. Unclear WTF is happening as usual.
Guus
something about the <something> moving data from ireland to the US to no longer need to be compliant with privacy legislation post brexit.
dwd
Guus, But for now, at least, DPA-2018 covers us for GDPR under the same regime as GDPR.
moparisthebest
laws aside, I'm not sure how someone can post something in a public channel open to anyone and reasonably assume one of those members might not keep+share it
lovetoxhas joined
jonas’
dwd: if the room is public I don't see a gdpr issue
jonas’
the data was "manifestly made public" IMO
jonas’
also, I'd probably only keep archives for sync purposes and otherwise only relay live data
moparisthebest
that seems right, room owner is making it available for download for anyone on the internet to grab already
dwd
jonas’, Would it still be subject to a SAR, etc? I think probably, and in addition, correction rights etc might exist.
jonas’
dwd: probably. hence only keep sync archives
jonas’
then there is a technical reason for non-deletion and correction can be done by the user through (ab-)use of LMC
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
mukt2has left
mukt2has joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
LNJhas left
LNJhas joined
LNJhas left
LNJhas joined
adiaholichas left
andrey.ghas left
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
adiaholichas joined
Danielhas left
Danielhas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
Alex__has joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
mukt2has left
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
mukt2has joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
adiaholichas left
Dele Olajidehas left
adiaholichas joined
mukt2has left
pdurbinhas joined
Dele Olajidehas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
mukt2has joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
edhelashas left
andrey.ghas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
edhelashas joined
pdurbinhas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
Dele Olajidehas left
lorddavidiiihas left
Dele Olajidehas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
krauqhas left
lovetoxhas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
krauqhas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
lovetoxhas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
emushas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
Nekithas left
Nekithas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
mukt2has left
lorddavidiiihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
jonas’
do folks think it’d be useful to announce editor messages in this channel, too? (in addition to standards@)
lovetox
jonas’, do you plan changes on the muclumbus http api?
jonas’
lovetox, no
lovetox
great
lovetox
and the xmpp api will migrate to the xep you just propsed i guess?
jonas’
yes
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
jonas’
does anyone know if we (Editors) need Board and/or Council Approval for this? https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/896/files
lorddavidiiihas joined
Guus
I don't know, but I'd be surprised. This is a change to tooling, not so much to published specifications.
jonas’
it’s changing how we suggest people write their XEPs tho
jonas’
xep-template.xml is a suggestion
lorddavidiiihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
mukt2has joined
Guus
sure - but it doesn't affect the actual process of acceptance of the XEP.
Guus
for that, we still have Council.
Guus
Do previous changes to that file make reference to approval of anyone?
lorddavidiiihas left
mukt2has left
lovetoxhas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
mukt2has joined
emushas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
marchas left
pdurbinhas joined
mukt2has left
marchas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
jonas’
nope
MattJ
Go for it. If you want a clear conscience, just post to standards@ about the update