Btw why psa doesn't visit this conference anymore?
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
LNJhas joined
LNJhas left
LNJhas joined
Lancehas joined
paulhas joined
jonas’
he does, sometimes
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
mtavareshas left
mtavareshas joined
Maxhas left
Maxhas joined
debxwoodyhas joined
Nekithas left
Nekithas joined
debxwoodyhas left
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
Lancehas left
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
karoshihas joined
raghavgururajanhas left
raghavgururajanhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
matkorhas left
matkorhas joined
Marchas joined
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
mukt2has left
raghavgururajanhas left
mimi89999has left
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
mimi89999has joined
raghavgururajanhas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
mukt2has joined
rionhas left
rionhas joined
goffihas joined
adiaholichas left
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
Steve Killehas left
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
marc0s
I've just noticed that one example from the reminders protoxep I sent this week to editor@ has an error. Should I just resend the fixed version? Would that fix count as a revision even if it's still a protoxep?
Steve Killehas joined
pdurbinhas left
raghavgururajanhas left
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
etahas joined
pdurbinhas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
LNJhas left
LNJhas joined
mukt2has left
Shellhas left
jubalhhas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
jubalhhas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
nyco-2has left
nyco-2has joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
mukt2has joined
lorddavidiiihas left
waqashas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
xelxebarhas left
lorddavidiiihas left
mukt2has left
lorddavidiiihas joined
pdurbinhas left
lorddavidiiihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
etahas left
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
Dele Olajide2has joined
Dele Olajide2has left
Dele Olajide2has joined
Dele Olajide2has left
Dele (Mobile)has left
debaclehas joined
Dele (Mobile)has joined
mukt2has joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
davidhas left
jonas’
marc0s, is the error critical, in a way that confuses the reader?
jonas’
or is it more editorial?
eevvoorhas joined
jonas’
revisions on ProtoXEPs are to be avoided because they are more or less under vote, so unless it makes the entire document unclear, defer that change until the XEP has been accepted
j.rhas left
j.rhas joined
marc0s
jonas’, not at all, I think, it's an attribute that should not be there, and it's not mentioned in the text at all
Shellhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
jonas’
marc0s, yeah, then don’t worry about it
marc0s
ok, perfect
marc0s
thanks
pep.
As quick feedback and sorry-not-on-list, I find it weird that the server sends back all info the client has sent all the time, or did I miss a MAY?
jonas’
yes, I also find that odd
jonas’
would comment on that on-list
jonas’
feels redundant and weird.
jonas’
an empty <iq type='result'/> is perfectly valid and would probably be the right response
pep.
yeah
marc0s
> revisions on ProtoXEPs are to be avoided because they are more or less under vote, so unless it makes the entire document unclear, defer that change until the XEP has been accepted
understandable 🙂
marc0s
> As quick feedback and sorry-not-on-list, I find it weird that the server sends back all info the client has sent all the time, or did I miss a MAY?
it can be stated as a MAY, yes, this is probably some personal bias 🙂
marc0s
nonetheless, I thought of having the server sending back the id, in the case the reminder has to be cancelled afterwards
pep.
Ah ok, sure then, send the id back, but the rest doesn't seem to be needed :)
Dele (Mobile)has left
jonas’
that’s in fact similar to how pubsub publish works
jonas’
you send a request and it sends the response without the payload, just the id attribute attached
Marchas left
Marchas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
larmahas left
marc0s
ok, thanks a lot for the feedback 🙂
karoshihas left
karoshihas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
larmahas joined
emushas left
Marchas left
Marchas joined
davidhas joined
emushas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
paulhas left
paulhas joined
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
mukt2has left
lorddavidiiihas joined
mukt2has joined
Marchas left
Marchas joined
lskdjfhas joined
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
mukt2has left
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
murabitohas joined
pep.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8711 Structure of the IETF Administrative Support Activity, Version 2.0
pep.
There's an article about this for those who speak baguette et fromage (or one or the other): https://www.bortzmeyer.org/8711.html
Was it really possible to read chat content from the link alone?
Shellhas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
larma
The link allows you to join, so yes
Ge0rG
> Links to private chat groups in the proprietary WhatsApp messenger can be used to show the communication and private data of group members, even if you are not a member.
That sounds like "without joining", but not quite?
larma
Not sure exactly, maybe you can get preview or sth
lorddavidiiihas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
Jeybehas left
Jeybehas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
Link Mauvehas left
lorddavidiiihas left
Jeybehas left
Jeybehas joined
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
ajhas joined
Jeybehas left
Jeybehas joined
!XSF_Martinhas left
!XSF_Martinhas joined
ajhas left
nyco-2has left
nyco-2has joined
Shellhas left
gavhas left
pdurbinhas joined
gavhas joined
Jeybehas left
Jeybehas joined
pdurbinhas left
Shellhas joined
serge90has left
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
Marchas left
Marchas joined
Dele Olajidehas left
Dele Olajidehas joined
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
Maxhas left
Maxhas joined
pep.
larma: thanks for the link! spamming the RT here as well:
https://post.lurk.org/@pep/103736700377632789
Jeybehas left
Jeybehas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
lovetoxhas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
gavhas left
gavhas joined
vanitasvitaehas left
gavhas left
gavhas joined
gavhas left
vanitasvitaehas joined
lovetoxhas left
j.rhas left
lovetoxhas joined
Jeybehas left
Jeybehas joined
Wojtekhas joined
gavhas joined
etahas left
etahas joined
raghavgururajanhas joined
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
raghavgururajanhas left
gavhas left
pdurbinhas joined
Jeybehas left
Jeybehas joined
emushas joined
Jeybehas left
andrey.ghas left
pdurbinhas left
Jeybehas joined
Jeybehas left
Jeybehas joined
andyhas left
Jeybehas left
Jeybehas joined
andyhas joined
Jeybe
Ge0rG, larma: Chat content wasn't readable from the link alone as stated by DW:
> Even without actively joining a group, its title, description, image and creator's phone number are available for all. However, upon entering a group, it is possible to also see the phone numbers of up to 256 participants, as well as other information, and adding these numbers to one's contacts can reveal their names in the app.
Source: https://m.dw.com/en/whatsapp-security-flaw-over-60000-groups-still-accessible-online/a-52543414