XSF Discussion - 2020-03-11

https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/905

jonas’, re xep390, how big are the changes? would it motivate you do update the xep given that xep390 is likely to be approached by gsoc students as teaser task?

(at least for smack it is a teaser task)

flow, hm, I’d have to look into my notes/stashes

Hi! I just found this while searching for XMPP RFCs: https://xmpp.org/rfcs/index.shtml

Is there an up-to-date version?

I’d start off RFC 6120, RFC 6121 and RFC 6122 and check the Updated By fields

I don’t think we have more up-to-date info on the website

though a bunch of RFCs are listed at the top of this page: https://xmpp.org/extensions/

a few RFCs are listed at the top of https://xmpp.org/extensions/

index.shtml is something ancient tho

should probably be removed (or updated and integrated into the remainder of the website)

Thanks! :)

(#PRswelcome)

I'm not exactly happy with how we handle discussions in PRs (or don't, rather). We redirect people to the list but it's not like there was a thread for each small change that makes it as PR

pep., you obviously sometimes need to create the thread

you, me? the editor? Or the author or the PR? Or the one who wants to react "but not on github"?

*of the

pep., if there was already discussion in the PR, the ideal thing for an editor to do would be to spawn a thread quoting the discussion

(and then link it in the PR and lock the PR)

pep the person wanting to comment the PR

Comments on Github don't count!

cool, Dino does properly highlight nicks

https://fsfellowship.eu/shaming-and-suicide-movies/ (FSFE et Debian)

oh, wrong room