XSF Discussion - 2020-04-09

MattJ, I note that the "new" mam version has no forward pointers to the split out xeps

I think you definelty want to add those, especially since it still talk about configuration of mam in the introduction…

It has a to-do I think, for once the new XEPs have numbers

"new" mam version?

There are PRs and a thread on the list

MattJ, , ahh haven't looked at the XML

!

It's time

MattJ, Seve, Guus, ralphm

here

👋

Here

Almost complete. Should I go ahead?

We don't seem to have much of an agenda today

# Welcome

Sorry I just sent minutes for last week. I'd appreciate in the future if other people could help out. Thanks

# Hire comms person

No update this week. more poking and more waiting for replies

Guus maybe? Any idea what happened to "License for website content"?

Are you specifically asking about ideas on comms person? I don't have anything on that

Or what didn't happen

No sorry I'm talking about https://trello.com/c/2i7dAmq6/375-license-for-website-content

Ah

from memory: didn't we agree to go with creative commons?

hmm, maybe not

Ok, I don't see any statement anywhere, maybe we should clarify that at some point

https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/issues/407 holds some feedback from Peter

(and that pushes back the issue to another 6 months in the future)

it's been a while since I last looked at that. nyco was driving it mostly, but he's not in board any longer.

Ok, MattJ no update for the infra budget?

No, not yet

# AOB?

Yes

none from me

MattJ, go ahead

(None)

We voted Jonas onto iteam. Zash is currently a pseudo-member as he was drafted in a while back to help with maintaining xmpp:xmpp.org

I'd like to ensure he is formally a member

To put the other half into iteam as well

Does he want to? 🙂

As we try to clean up the list of exactly who is on iteam

I'm happy to vote on Zash's iteam membership, if that helps.

or do you want to do that all in one go, if you foresee additional members pending the cleanup?

Me too, with a preemptive +1. I wouldn't want to forcibly add him to the team though. We should send xmpp validation links

Well Zash is already on the mailing list and already has access to the server

This happened last year or so

I'm ok with this.

Let's put this to a vote then? I motion we add Zash to iteam

+1

+1

+1

+1

Zash, you're in!

> Well Zash is already on the mailing list and already has access to the server > This happened last year or so Although how come this happened? Curious about the process

"Need more hands. Zash do this quick"

I posted to the iteam list and someone said "yeah, ok" iirc

Approval from existing iteam members iirc. I did some stuff to improve https://logs.xmpp.org/

And then we made a big fuss about voting on Jonas's membership

I'm always curious why teams could approve members themselves btw

couldn't*

Ok, any other AOB?

> And then we made a big fuss about voting on Jonas's membership Yeah, I know Zash lended a hand there, so I was not sure why this and that being different

Tbh I thought they could, but I assumed iteam may be special

Thanks for the work by the way

No other AOB here

None here

jonas’, Zash, I don't know if the website has been updated with your team memberships, could you (one, or maybe even MattJ) submit something?

That is something I plan to do soon

Thanks

Once we figure out who the members are

right

# Close

Thanks all

tx!

👋

Thanks pep.