I'm here, need to step afk for ~60s though to deliver a message
Guus
Hi
ralphm
Seve?
Seve
Hello there!
Guus
> I'm here, need to step afk for ~60s though to deliver a message
If only you had an extensible protocol to do that...
ralphm
Any items not on trello?
pep.
not from me
Guus
None here
ralphm
1. Minute taker
pep.
Not me.
typikolhas joined
pep.
Tired of doing it almost every week
krauqhas left
typikolhas left
MattJ
Agenda item: can we replace this role with a bot?
MattJ
Many other orgs that do online text meetings do
ralphm
We have logs. What would the bot do?
MattJ
https://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot is commonly used, for examle
MattJ
It's logs + some annotations, I guess (so it can record actions and decisions)
Zash
Has been done in the past, e.g. Kev had one IIRC
MattJ
Yes
MattJ
I think there have been a couple
Seve
It would be an improvement, I'm sure.
ralphm
I'm not opposed.
ralphm
In the mean while, we still need a minute taker for this meeting.
MattJ
43% of the way through the meeting and we still don't have one
MattJ
I'll volunteer if we can move on
ralphm
Thanks MattJ
MattJ
But I can't make promises about when they'll get sent out, if ever
MattJ
Based on my track record :)
ralphm
2. Hiring Communications Person
pep.
!
Guushas left
Guushas joined
Guus
My battery is about to die. Might drop out.
pep.
As mentioned last week, MattJ and I have met with a marketing person
ralphm
What are the next steps?
pep.
She has provided a document for us to review. We've created a private channel to share it as it's labeled "confidential" :x
pep.
I invited board and commteam
Shellhas left
ralphm
I skimmed the document a bit. Need to look at it in more detail.
pep.
I have invited you I think, but I haven't heard back from you
pep.
k
pep.
Next step for this is read it, and meet. I think it's been agreed in the room monday 3PM UTC. Please talk if it's not possible for you :)
ralphm
That should be fine.
ralphm
Without getting ahead of ourselves, I think one of the questions we need to answer is: if this is the right approach for us, how long would we want to use their services.
pep.
Sure. I'm just waiting for the meeting to talk about it
ralphm
ok
ralphm
moving on then
ralphm
Thanks for this, btw
govanifyhas left
ralphm
3. iteam budget
ralphm
MattJ, have you thought about this?
MattJ
It's ongoing. Assuming that the status quo on spending is ok, then let's just remove this until we finalize a plan.
ralphm
I think it is. Will archive the item
pep.
yep
MattJ
On iteam:
MattJ
the old server is back online, and I restarted xmpp.net there
MattJ
But we have no plan to move services back that are already on the new machine
Danielhas left
Danielhas joined
mukt2has left
mukt2has joined
MattJ
The new machine has backups (thanks Kev) so we're good
pep.
Any news on why it went offline?
ralphm
cool
LNJhas left
MattJ
pep., no
LNJhas joined
ralphm
so what is the old server doing besides xmpp.net?
MattJ
At this point, nothing
ralphm
Plans?
MattJ
Not really, though I feel it might be a good home for xmpp.net and/or services like it that aren't mission-critical
MattJ
xmpp.net was resource-heavy and affecting other services often
MattJ
So it's nice to have it separate now
pep.
Not from iteam, but as long as there's no answer from the host I'd be wary of putting anything mission-critical there indeed
etahas left
etahas joined
ralphm
ok
ralphm
4. AOB
Seve
None from me.
govanifyhas joined
Dele Olajidehas joined
MattJ
None here
ralphm
One thing I noticed is that we missed deadlines for participating in Google's Season of Docs. I missed the announcements. Something to remember for next year.
pep.
There was an xsf calendar right?
pep.
Maybe put it there
ralphm
There is one, yes
ralphm
I haven't found next year's timeline, but might be good to put a reminder on it.
pep.
Nothing from me either
ralphm
5. Date of Next
ralphm
+1W
ralphm
6. Close
ralphm
Thanks all!
ralphmbangs gavel
pep.
Thanks
MattJ
Thanks
Seve
Thank you all!
dwd
Shame about Summer of Docs. I meant to track that one, but what with everything going on I';ve been a bit busy.
Danielhas left
ralphm
FWIW, I subscribed to https://twitter.com/googleoss now, which makes it (more) likely I see it for next time around.
Danielhas joined
ralphm
Crazy times, not surprising it got missed.
dwd
Oh, absolutely. As I say, I had fully intended to push on that myself.
ralphm
There are quite some mentoring organizations, but I haven't seen any mention of it in the past months.
krauqhas joined
ralphm
None of the tweeps I follow has mentioned it, neither has hacker news.
ralphm
I guess we're not the only ones with marketing issues :/
mukt2has left
Guushas left
ralphm
dwd, also https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/season-of-docs-announce
mukt2has joined
andyhas left
stpeterhas joined
MattJ
ralphm, ping
ralphm
Still here
andyhas joined
MattJ
Not sure if you're getting 1:1 notifications?
adiaholic_has left
adiaholic_has joined
Guushas joined
karoshihas left
karoshihas joined
Kev
I seem to have been highlighted, but I don't want to scroll back through 100 messages. If it was important, try again.
Zash
Hm, how hard would it be to extract how long a XEP has been deferred when it comes back to experimental?
Zash
Kev: Nothing important. You had a meeting bot once, IIRC, and there was mention of meeting bots.
Kev
Ah. Yes, I had a sleekbot for Council items. It was something like !addagenda, !startmeeting and !next, or thereabouts.
adiaholic_has left
adiaholic_has joined
lovetoxhas left
Shellhas joined
Zash
https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0333.html#revision-history-v0.4 that's not over a year ago, was that too minor to bump out of Deferred?
pep.
Kev: any chance the code is somewhere public?
Andrzejhas joined
Kev
pep.: I would be amazed if I didn't publish it at the time. Whether I can now find it is another matter.
lovetoxhas joined
Kev
It wasn't sleekbot, it was Swiftob, by the look of it. https://github.com/swift/swiftob/blob/master/scripts/agenda.lua
pep.
lua!!
pep.drops the script on the floor
andyhas left
LNJhas left
LNJhas joined
xnamed^has joined
andyhas joined
nycohas left
nycohas joined
adiaholic_has left
adiaholic_has joined
stpeterhas left
adiaholic_has left
adiaholic_has joined
stpeterhas joined
lovetoxhas left
andyhas left
Andrzejhas left
krauqhas left
MattJ
https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/reactions.html vs. XEP-0367?
andyhas joined
MattJ
Movim does 367, right?
MattJ
Does it support removing reactions?
queen_tilfaarhas left
queen_tilfaarhas joined
pep.
No, movim does xxxx-reactions I think. It's changed