- ralphm bangs gavel
-
ralphm
0. Welcome
-
ralphm
Hi!
-
pep.
!
-
MattJ
Hey
-
MattJ
I'm here, need to step afk for ~60s though to deliver a message
-
Guus
Hi
-
ralphm
Seve?
-
Seve
Hello there!
-
Guus
> I'm here, need to step afk for ~60s though to deliver a message If only you had an extensible protocol to do that...
-
ralphm
Any items not on trello?
-
pep.
not from me
-
Guus
None here
-
ralphm
1. Minute taker
-
pep.
Not me.
-
pep.
Tired of doing it almost every week
-
MattJ
Agenda item: can we replace this role with a bot?
-
MattJ
Many other orgs that do online text meetings do
-
ralphm
We have logs. What would the bot do?
-
MattJ
https://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot is commonly used, for examle
-
MattJ
It's logs + some annotations, I guess (so it can record actions and decisions)
-
Zash
Has been done in the past, e.g. Kev had one IIRC
-
MattJ
Yes
-
MattJ
I think there have been a couple
-
Seve
It would be an improvement, I'm sure.
-
ralphm
I'm not opposed.
-
ralphm
In the mean while, we still need a minute taker for this meeting.
-
MattJ
43% of the way through the meeting and we still don't have one
-
MattJ
I'll volunteer if we can move on
-
ralphm
Thanks MattJ
-
MattJ
But I can't make promises about when they'll get sent out, if ever
-
MattJ
Based on my track record :)
-
ralphm
2. Hiring Communications Person
-
pep.
!
-
Guus
My battery is about to die. Might drop out.
-
pep.
As mentioned last week, MattJ and I have met with a marketing person
-
ralphm
What are the next steps?
-
pep.
She has provided a document for us to review. We've created a private channel to share it as it's labeled "confidential" :x
-
pep.
I invited board and commteam
-
ralphm
I skimmed the document a bit. Need to look at it in more detail.
-
pep.
I have invited you I think, but I haven't heard back from you
-
pep.
k
-
pep.
Next step for this is read it, and meet. I think it's been agreed in the room monday 3PM UTC. Please talk if it's not possible for you :)
-
ralphm
That should be fine.
-
ralphm
Without getting ahead of ourselves, I think one of the questions we need to answer is: if this is the right approach for us, how long would we want to use their services.
-
pep.
Sure. I'm just waiting for the meeting to talk about it
-
ralphm
ok
-
ralphm
moving on then
-
ralphm
Thanks for this, btw
-
ralphm
3. iteam budget
-
ralphm
MattJ, have you thought about this?
-
MattJ
It's ongoing. Assuming that the status quo on spending is ok, then let's just remove this until we finalize a plan.
-
ralphm
I think it is. Will archive the item
-
pep.
yep
-
MattJ
On iteam:
-
MattJ
the old server is back online, and I restarted xmpp.net there
-
MattJ
But we have no plan to move services back that are already on the new machine
-
MattJ
The new machine has backups (thanks Kev) so we're good
-
pep.
Any news on why it went offline?
-
ralphm
cool
-
MattJ
pep., no
-
ralphm
so what is the old server doing besides xmpp.net?
-
MattJ
At this point, nothing
-
ralphm
Plans?
-
MattJ
Not really, though I feel it might be a good home for xmpp.net and/or services like it that aren't mission-critical
-
MattJ
xmpp.net was resource-heavy and affecting other services often
-
MattJ
So it's nice to have it separate now
-
pep.
Not from iteam, but as long as there's no answer from the host I'd be wary of putting anything mission-critical there indeed
-
ralphm
ok
-
ralphm
4. AOB
-
Seve
None from me.
-
MattJ
None here
-
ralphm
One thing I noticed is that we missed deadlines for participating in Google's Season of Docs. I missed the announcements. Something to remember for next year.
-
pep.
There was an xsf calendar right?
-
pep.
Maybe put it there
-
ralphm
There is one, yes
-
ralphm
I haven't found next year's timeline, but might be good to put a reminder on it.
-
pep.
Nothing from me either
-
ralphm
5. Date of Next
-
ralphm
+1W
-
ralphm
6. Close
-
ralphm
Thanks all!
- ralphm bangs gavel
-
pep.
Thanks
-
MattJ
Thanks
-
Seve
Thank you all!
-
dwd
Shame about Summer of Docs. I meant to track that one, but what with everything going on I';ve been a bit busy.
-
ralphm
FWIW, I subscribed to https://twitter.com/googleoss now, which makes it (more) likely I see it for next time around.
-
ralphm
Crazy times, not surprising it got missed.
-
dwd
Oh, absolutely. As I say, I had fully intended to push on that myself.
-
ralphm
There are quite some mentoring organizations, but I haven't seen any mention of it in the past months.
-
ralphm
None of the tweeps I follow has mentioned it, neither has hacker news.
-
ralphm
I guess we're not the only ones with marketing issues :/
-
ralphm
dwd, also https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/season-of-docs-announce
-
MattJ
ralphm, ping
-
ralphm
Still here
-
MattJ
Not sure if you're getting 1:1 notifications?
-
Kev
I seem to have been highlighted, but I don't want to scroll back through 100 messages. If it was important, try again.
-
Zash
Hm, how hard would it be to extract how long a XEP has been deferred when it comes back to experimental?
-
Zash
Kev: Nothing important. You had a meeting bot once, IIRC, and there was mention of meeting bots.
-
Kev
Ah. Yes, I had a sleekbot for Council items. It was something like !addagenda, !startmeeting and !next, or thereabouts.
-
Zash
https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0333.html#revision-history-v0.4 that's not over a year ago, was that too minor to bump out of Deferred?
-
pep.
Kev: any chance the code is somewhere public?
-
Kev
pep.: I would be amazed if I didn't publish it at the time. Whether I can now find it is another matter.
-
Kev
It wasn't sleekbot, it was Swiftob, by the look of it. https://github.com/swift/swiftob/blob/master/scripts/agenda.lua
-
pep.
lua!!
- pep. drops the script on the floor
-
MattJ
https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/reactions.html vs. XEP-0367?
-
MattJ
Movim does 367, right?
-
MattJ
Does it support removing reactions?
-
pep.
No, movim does xxxx-reactions I think. It's changed
-
pep.
And yes