Neustradamus_ Do you mean a feature where a ban can be defined for a certain period? That might make for an interesting add-on - but I'm thinking that more than 90% of the use case of banning would be to remove people permanently.
Guus
But I do not immediately see a reason why something like a ban period cannot be added.
mukt2has joined
xnamed^has left
xnamed^has joined
mukt2has left
mukt2has joined
adiaholic_has left
adiaholic_has joined
Shellhas joined
rionhas left
rionhas joined
wurstsalathas joined
bearhas joined
rionhas left
rionhas joined
Steve Killehas joined
goffihas joined
Lainuxhas joined
davidhas left
davidhas joined
davidhas left
davidhas joined
karoshihas left
adiaholic_has left
adiaholic_has joined
karoshihas joined
davidhas left
davidhas joined
Andrzejhas joined
mukt2has left
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
mukt2has joined
eevvoorhas joined
Dele Olajidehas joined
debaclehas joined
neshtaxmpphas joined
neshtaxmpphas left
lskdjfhas joined
adiaholic_has left
adiaholic_has joined
chynahas left
Steve Killehas left
Steve Killehas joined
Neustradamus_
Guus: Yes! But in XEP-0045 not in a new
eevvoorhas left
Guus
Neustradamus_ XEP-0045 is not final, so you can propose a change.
eevvoorhas joined
karoshihas left
chynahas joined
mukt2has left
eevvoorhas left
eevvoorhas joined
Holger
I'd suggest avoid being banned by not going on people's nerves in the first place :->
Daniel
😂
karoshihas joined
chynahas left
xnamed^has left
larma
Neustradamus_, why is it important to be in XEP-0045 and not a new XEP?
jonas’
Link Mauve, AFAIK, @xml:lang is allowed everywhere and you don’t have to add support for it
jonas’
if you really wanted to specifically point at @xml:lang, you could declare it in the schema under a different prefix -- nobody forces you to use xml as prefix
vanitasvitae
> https://github.com/zoom/zoom-e2e-whitepaper
Impressive that they got Mathew Green as an author
chynahas joined
jonas’
> .pdf
jonas’
*sigh*
vanitasvitae
yeah 😛
vanitasvitae
COMMIT ALL DEM BINARIES!!!
Guus
hey, at least it's not a Word document.
larma
that zoom e2e thing makes no sense to me
mukt2has joined
larma
"Ed25519 is not FIPS approved but it's better, so we just do Ed25519 *and* P-384 for everything. Ed25519 for the securit and P-384 to make regulators happy"
vanitasvitae
😀
larma
This is what happens when you design crypto protocols with business in mind
Neustradamus_
It is better to have a full perfect XEP that several.
Holger
Why not put everything into a full perfect RFC 6120?
archas left
archas joined
wurstsalat
don't feed him :D
vanitasvitae
😀
vanitasvitae
I'd write the IETF!
Guus
fwiw, to me, this particular feature seems more suitable to be injected in the existing XEP more than as a stand-alone one.
larma
Neustradamus_, it doesn't make a difference if you open issues everywhere "support new XEP for banning with period" or "support new version of XEP-0045"
Guus
be nice, guys.
larma
Guus, I think XEP-0045 is already too big and already has too many things not properly defined whereas others are defined down to the detail
larma
I mean, just a random example but but §10.3 and §10.6 are 1.5 pages virtually identitical text
Guus
larma not adding this won't change that, but at least it'll remain consistent. Also, I'm most unlikely to die on this particular hill.✎
Seve
I completely agree with that, Guus
Guus
larma not adding this won't change that, but at least it'll remain consistent if this is added. Also, I'm most unlikely to die on this particular hill. ✏
larma
I mean, for this specifically I also won't mind
larma
The only problem I see is that it moves finalizing further away
Guus
Sure. I think we're pretty much agreeing on things.
karoshihas left
jonas’
I think that xep-0045.xml should only receive bugfixes at this point, new features should go into inbox/
xsfhas left
xsfhas joined
govanifyhas left
govanifyhas joined
Guuspoints at hill: "not where I'm going to die"
jonas’
not sure if that’s your choice ;P
Guus
I'm also not going to die on the hill that is the discussion on what hill I'm going to die on.
Guus
also, I find this morbid fascination slightly disturbing.
jonas’
you started it
Guus
Yes, talking about my own fascinations mostly 🙂
jonas’
also, the wife and I are watching The Good Place atm, some slight increase in comical morbidity is to be expected. (note: The Good Place is full of plot twists, so don’t read a plot summary if you’re curious)
papatutuwawahas left
matkorhas left
matkorhas joined
karoshihas joined
j.rhas left
LNJhas joined
andrey.ghas joined
matkorhas left
Guus
Trying to play out Netflix eh? Fair warning: the end boss is hard.
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
govanifyhas left
govanifyhas joined
j.rhas joined
karoshihas left
matkorhas joined
papatutuwawahas joined
neshtaxmpphas joined
karoshihas joined
j.rhas left
j.rhas joined
karoshihas left
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
mukt2has left
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
eevvoorhas left
larmahas left
mukt2has joined
papatutuwawahas left
gabrielhas left
neshtaxmpphas left
gabrielhas joined
larmahas joined
LNJhas left
LNJhas joined
mukt2has left
karoshihas joined
papatutuwawahas joined
karoshihas left
MattJ
Sigh, jabber.org
neshtaxmpphas joined
karoshihas joined
Guus
Have you tried turning it off and on again?
mathieui
the turning off part is quite battle-tested at this point
interesting how frequent I now see message edits being used in XMPP 😀
vanitasvitae
very useful feature apparently
Holger
And WhatsApp doesn't have it!!!
neshtaxmpphas joined
adiaholic_has left
adiaholic_has joined
mukt2has left
mukt2has joined
Neustradamus_has joined
vanitasvitae
pathetic!!!
Zash
But WhatsApp was based on XMPP, therefore it's XMPP that's pathetic!!!!1!!!!!!eleven
calvinhas joined
karoshihas left
robertooohas left
Neustradamus_
vanitasvitae: There is always the problem about XEP-0308: Last Message Correction: History, there are all changes...
neshtaxmpphas left
pep.
Neustradamus_, ask your client dev to fix this
karoshihas joined
pep.
It's possible for most cases
pep.
Also possibly combined with 0421
karoshihas left
Neustradamus_
pep.: The XEP has been updated?
pep.
Which
Neustradamus_
XEP-0308
neshtaxmpphas joined
pep.
It doesn't need to?
pep.
The fact that clients don't group corrections in MUC history is only due to them not being able to assert it's the same user. 0421 gives them the ability (for MUCs that have it deployed, obviously)
mukt2has left
karoshihas joined
neshtaxmpphas left
Neustradamus_
rion: ^
Shellhas left
Neustradamus_
Jabber.org has problem since several days no?
Andrzejhas left
Steve Killehas left
karoshihas left
Steve Killehas joined
neshtaxmpphas joined
Shellhas joined
debaclehas left
Guus
yes. The admins are already aware of the problems.
emushas left
mukt2has joined
emushas joined
Neustradamus_
Guus: Thanks to confirm me!
I have not contacted several days ago, but today there are lost messages...
mukt2has left
mukt2has joined
debaclehas joined
debaclehas left
debaclehas joined
neshtaxmpphas left
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
queen_tilfaarhas joined
karoshihas joined
karoshihas left
mukt2has left
mukt2has joined
papatutuwawahas left
govanifyhas left
govanifyhas joined
Shellhas left
neshtaxmpphas joined
mukt2has left
karoshihas joined
queen_tilfaarhas left
mukt2has joined
karoshihas left
govanifyhas left
govanifyhas joined
govanifyhas left
govanifyhas joined
mukt2has left
lovetoxhas joined
lovetoxhas left
lovetoxhas joined
lovetoxhas left
lovetoxhas joined
neshtaxmpphas left
Andrzejhas joined
robertooohas joined
govanifyhas left
govanifyhas joined
alexishas left
alexishas joined
neshtaxmpphas joined
mukt2has joined
etahas left
etahas joined
lovetoxhas left
papatutuwawahas joined
karoshihas joined
waqashas left
waqashas joined
govanifyhas left
govanifyhas joined
karoshihas left
alexishas left
alexishas joined
alexishas left
lovetoxhas joined
karoshihas joined
Wojtekhas joined
papatutuwawahas left
adiaholic_has left
adiaholic_has joined
adiaholic_has left
adiaholic_has joined
mukt2has left
archas left
archas joined
queen_tilfaarhas joined
MattJ
I've emailed Isode support. I've no idea what's wrong, and a restart didn't help
queen_tilfaarhas left
Kev
AFAICS it's working, just overloaded.
lovetoxhas left
Kev
I'm watching authentications get logged. If I telnet to the port I get responses (slowly)
waqashas left
xeckshas left
xeckshas joined
alexishas joined
jonas’
I sometimes got successful connections when I tried to debug why I ran into timeouts while checking it
jonas’
so a fun DoS?
mukt2has joined
Kev
Possibly.
Zash
Actual DoS or post-restart flood?
Kev
Don't know.
jonas’
needs more cloudflare
matkorhas left
matkorhas joined
karoshihas left
lovetoxhas joined
j.rhas left
j.rhas joined
Half-Shothas left
papatutuwawahas joined
paulhas left
paulhas joined
karoshihas joined
Half-Shothas joined
Shellhas joined
alexishas left
alexishas joined
lovetoxhas left
neshtaxmpphas left
mukt2has left
mukt2has joined
lovetoxhas joined
Kev
Seems to be completely responsive now, to me.
Kev
And CPU is no longer pegged.
adiaholic_has left
papatutuwawahas left
alameyohas left
alameyohas joined
Nekithas left
alexishas left
govanifyhas left
govanifyhas joined
MattJ
Great
rionhas left
rionhas joined
Neustradamus_
Dear Jabber.org team, it is possible to have a special mucroom for it?
MattJ
Thanks for checking... if you don't see the cause then pretty sure I had no chance. I'll look at traffic next time perhaps
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
Kev
I couldn't see anything particular from any one host, it just seemed to be 'lots'.
Kev
As Zash says, the same sort you normally see swapming post-restart.✎
Kev
As Zash says, the same sort you normally see swamping post-restart. ✏
queen_tilfaarhas joined
papatutuwawahas joined
werdanhas joined
govanifyhas left
govanifyhas joined
queen_tilfaarhas left
karoshihas left
adiaholic_has joined
Guus
'lots' being one more than many-many-three?
Guus
It's been to long since I opened a discworld book...