I guess I'll pull and remove my version block to put it afterwards
Zash
Aren't all fields URIs?
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
flow
pep., do as you wish, e.g. feel free to squash
flow
Zash, yes, but one could consider that it would be a breaking change if we add <validate/> to already existing form field registry entries
flow
I'd even say that all fields all URLs, but there appears to be no xs:anyURL
adiaholic_has left
adiaholic_has joined
andrey.ghas joined
karoshihas left
pep.
flow: not all fields are URLs no :x
Zash
URI, not URL
pep.
yes URI
flow
ahh right there are probably mailto: fields
pep.
and xmpp:
pep.
and..
Link Mauve
You can do a disco#info on xmpp:jabber.fr, we don’t have a single URL there.
karoshihas joined
Zash
Does 0157 even say that everything's an URI?
Link Mauve
Only in the examples obviously.
Zash
Data forms validation on result forms... it's not like a requester can take much action if something doesn't validate.
adiaholic_has left
adiaholic_has joined
mukt2has left
karoshihas left
karoshihas joined
mukt2has joined
j.rhas left
j.rhas joined
karoshihas left
karoshihas joined
karoshihas left
karoshihas joined
queen_tilfaarhas joined
neshtaxmpphas left
queen_tilfaarhas left
mukt2has left
mukt2has joined
xsfhas left
Andrzejhas left
Andrzejhas joined
karoshihas left
Neustradamus_has left
karoshihas joined
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
queen_tilfaarhas joined
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
emushas left
mukt2has left
emushas joined
queen_tilfaarhas left
queen_tilfaarhas joined
flow
the validation is on the form field
pep.
I'd say it's merely a way to specify the type of data we expect to find in it (because it's not done for the other fields)
neshtaxmpphas joined
flow
it sure is
queen_tilfaarhas left
queen_tilfaarhas joined
queen_tilfaarhas left
queen_tilfaarhas joined
mukt2has joined
flow
but still teh validation is on the form field, so if ever this data form of 'type' form appears, which does not seem impossible, then the registry entry means that it must have a <validate/>
Zash
I suppose if you'd have a way to configure this via ad-hoc or somesuch it'd be nice to have
queen_tilfaarhas left
queen_tilfaarhas joined
queen_tilfaarhas left
pep.
Is anybody else than the server operator going to fill these?
pep.
Ah hmm yes
pep.
I'm thinking about cases like jabberfr serving other user's domains
queen_tilfaarhas joined
queen_tilfaar
Does this server have federated server to server communication disabled?
pep.
which server
queen_tilfaar
Conversations.im
Zash
I'm suddenly very confused
pep.
same
pep.
queen_tilfaar, no conversations.im doesn't have s2s disabled (I really doubt it). But I don't understand where this comes from, if you can add some bit of context that'd be great :)
Zash
nor does this MUC. everyone here has joined via s2s.
queen_tilfaar
Sure. Here it is.When I try to chat in this server using another account xxmp account, the message does not go through until I use this server's account.
pep.
Zash, everyone? :P
pep.
anon...
Zash
pep., right, but those rarely stay very long
pep.
Zash, ^ I think this is a case of anon.
Zash
They show up with an avatar to me, so I wouldn't think so.
Oh maybe is it because of the other sever doesnt support s2s?
Zash
If you joined here with an conversations.im-account, then s2s must be working
queen_tilfaar
Oh my bad
queen_tilfaar
But still the issue exist just saying
Zash
If you have an account elsewhere that can't join here, then it's most likely a problem with that server
queen_tilfaar
No what I meant to say is,
Zash
Don't have enough info to say more
queen_tilfaar
If I try to chat with conversations.imnl account disabled, I can't chat on this server even though s2s is enabled here
queen_tilfaar
Sorry I'm new to this
queen_tilfaar
I have to enable for the message to go through
queen_tilfaar
Even though I have my other account enabled
pep.
queen_tilfaar, what client are you using? Conversations?
queen_tilfaar
Yes
pep.
When you say "conversations.im account disabled", what does that mean?
pep.
You have added multiple accounts in conversations?
pep.
What is "here"
sonnyhas left
queen_tilfaar
I have 2 xmpp accounts
sonnyhas joined
queen_tilfaar
One is conversations.im and another different one
queen_tilfaar
I cant chat in this server if I have my conversation.im account disabled aka just with my other account alone
pep.
Maybe ask the operator of your other account
queen_tilfaar
So that means the problem is with the other server and can conversations.im right?
pep.
conversations.im would be the least suspicious in this story
Zash
Do you get an error message or something?
queen_tilfaar
Ok will do sorry I got just a little confused. Tnx for bumping my head up a little 😘
sonnyhas left
queen_tilfaar
Do you get an error message or something? Yeah something like enable the account to send the message
pep.
hmm? So is there any account enabled at all when you try to send a message?
queen_tilfaar
I'll do some experiments and hopefully contact the server ppl to see what went wrong
queen_tilfaar
hmm? So is there any account enabled at all when you try to send a message?
Yes my other account is enabled. I don't know how i made such a noob mistake of mistaking the error
Zash
Then I think it doesn't work like you think it works.
Zash
I have never used Conversations with multiple accounts, but it probably remembers which account you used to join, and disabling that and enabling another will probably not make that account join it without you doing something.
queen_tilfaar
> Then I think it doesn't work like you think it works.
No I just made a mistake. The problem might be with the other server. I have to Check it to make sure
pep.
Zash, ah right
pep.
That would surely be confusing
Zash
Maybe it would be better to ask about it in the Conversations room rather than here?
pep.
Indeed
Zash
Multi-account UX is Hard
queen_tilfaar
True. That's what I did wrong. All these days I mistook this server as the conversation.im server hence the confusion
queen_tilfaar
Idiot me. Tnx for helping
adiaholic_has left
adiaholic_has joined
Zash
Oh, there's a datatype registry in https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0122.html#registrar-reg-datatypes-init ?
Zash
I thought these were defined by XML
Neustradamus_has joined
queen_tilfaarhas left
Zash
Data validation wishlist: JID parts, XEP-0082.
robertooohas left
alexishas left
karoshihas left
karoshihas joined
pep.
I'm reading 369:
> MIX messages and presence are always sent and are addressed to the user (bare JID). This addressing is a consequence of users (not clients) being the participants in a MIX channel; It is a key difference between MUC and MIX. This addressing change means that the user's server needs to have MIX-specific behaviour to correctly distribute arriving messages and presence appropriately to MIX clients; there may be zero or more online clients that support MIX. This server behaviour is specified by MIX.
pep.
Does this mean that not all clients have to receive messages from a MIX channel (they don't have to be joined), or that if they support MIX they will receive messages
alexishas joined
pep.
I guess I'll ask on the list
pep.
!
pep.
it's time
pep.
MattJ, Guus, Seve, ralphm
MattJ
Hey, sorry, was on the phone
Seve
No problem :)
pep.
Not that there is much on the agenda but I'd like to at least have some quick observations re the marketing task
pep.
# Welcome
pep.
Anybody got an agenda item to add?
Guus
I'm here
MattJ
Nothing to add here
Guus
nothing from me
pep.
Ok then I'll go on with the marketing thing:
pep.
Thanks for those who've participated in the meeting we had on monday regarding the marketing task. We (I?) decided to invite board and commteam to a private channel because the document we were going to talk about was tagged confidential. It appeared almost none of the discussion resolved around specifics of that document though, so maybe we should have done it here..
pep.
With this out of the way,
pep.
From what I understand, and after a few days of letting it sink, it seems to me that some people disagree with what I wanted to do. What I had in mind taking this task was to help commteam, which at the time was not in really good shape (Nyco asking for help during Summit) and then disappearing for some time (not blaming, "we're all volunteers") leaving the team inactive before emus picked up some pieces and then jc surfaced again (again, not blaming),
karoshihas left
pep.
So my first goal was to reinforce the team. Which I don't think was really understood by all participants in the meeting on monday
Seve
That was not what the document suggested me. to me it feels you are talking about a community manager, but the proposal was different than that, to my eyes.
karoshihas joined
mukt2has left
pep.
From what I can see, some people really want to expand on what the XSF does. Which may be fine and I'm not opposed to this, but it's just not what I had in mind.
waqashas joined
pep.
So I'm going to park the task until commteam says they actually want it.
Guus
We've engaged a third party, that has been put in some effort. We should be clear to them as to expectations/timelines.
MattJ
Well, two concrete desires were highlighted at the meeting: pretty much everyone agreed that we want proper testimonials and a jobs board
pep.
Guus, yes I'm keeping them up-to-date as possible
Guus
ok!
adiaholic_has left
adiaholic_has joined
Guus
I think we've already agreed on having a job board, months ago?
Seve
Yes
pep.
last term yes
Guus
testimonials is an ongoing thing too.
pep.
But these are different tasks
Guus
I"m in favor of both - could also be done in parallel to a marketing effort (which in my mind is something different)
mukt2has joined
pep.
It just puts me in a weird position when the team who's concerned with this doesn't even agree
pep.
Which is why I wanted them on-board from the start, and I think I tried to but maybe I didn't do it properly
Guus
let's approach this similar to what we're doing with iteam: if the WT needs (paid) resources to improve their performance, board has signaled that it's open to that.
Guus
We can look at the WT to come up with suggestions on how to do that best.
Guus
What Matt and pep prepared could be a very good start to that effort - but it might be good to let the WT take the lead?
Guus
that prevents the awkward situation that pep described.
pep.
I'm happy to hand over contact details of the contractor after checking with them, if commteam is interested
pep.
But I need some kind of hint :)
pep.
That's it from me, I think.
Guus
Commteam members have explicitly asked for professional help - at least nyco has been vocal about this.
Guus
So, I'm assuming that the groundwork that you and Matt did is very helpful to do that.
pep.
Others seem to have a different opinion though
Guus
That's new to me - we've been talking about this on and of for months.
emus
If we are so unclear how or were in a Wt we need help, but agree that we need help, good professionals can also help to figure out what it could be actually✎
emus
If we are so unclear how or were in a WT we need help, but agree that we need help, good professionals can also help to figure out what it could be actually ✏
Guus
I suggest we punt this to the CommsTeam, and ask them to come up with a wishlist and/or plan of attack
emus
> So, I'm assuming that the groundwork that you and Matt did is very helpful to do that.
I think so too
Guus
so that at least there's consensus.
MattJ
Ok, so commteam please reach consensus and tell us what you want
Guus
Who's the lead of comm anyway? Nyco?
pep.
Is there a lead at all
Seve
I was not aware about what you guys talk regarding nyco requesting help
Zash
What's "WT"?
Guus
WT = work team
Zash
ack
Guus
they are supposed to have a chair, as defined in the bylaws, from how I understand them.
pep.
Seve, right, it has been said during Summit. I don't remember if this was written explicitely in the minutes sorry. But I remember it being mentioned online multiple times anyway
Guus
pep. can you confirm with comm team that they will tell us what they'd prefer, investment wise?
Guus
lets take it from there.
pep.
I'll follow-up with commteam
pep.
# AOB?
Guus
none here
pep.
Next: +1w
emus
# Can we have XSF meetings also at another time? (maybe once a month?)
emus
I dont know how many at least in Europe are working right now?
emus
maybe evening time once a month would help to let more people attent too
Guus
Are you suggesting to move this board meeting, or do you want to have a new meeting?
emus
Yes, sorry, this board meeting
emus
no always, maybe with alternating times
pep.
I guess most are working. I don't personally have an issue with moving the time, and as much as I'd like to accomodate members to join, I think this is mostly done to accomodate board members to join
Guus
I'd personally do not want to move this meeting, as that would clash with my other responsibilities.
MattJ
Indeed, work time for me ends at 5pm and that's when family time begins - I wouldn't be able to attend an evening meeting
emus
Okay, but if we have at least one of 4 meetings in a month at another time. because like this it excludes others completely too, right?
Guus
And, although it's not a private meeting, there might be value in not making this a town hall meeting either?
emus
🤷♂️ sure, but for me is usually hard to attentd this time
emus
I think that counts for others as well
karoshihas left
emus
but if Im the only one keep on doing
pep.
I appreciate the effort to participate in XSF meetings anyway :)
pep.
That's not the case for member
Guus
We have a lot of discussion venues outside of this particular meeting. To keep these meetings concise, it might be beneficial of not having everyone join in ,and have discussions elsewhere?
emus
Ok fine, agreed
pep.
# Any other AOB?
Guus
I'd be happy to move things around if it accomodates others, but not to the extend that it's putting up barriers for board members themselves to join.
emus
Don't have a feeling about how important attentance is in general.
Guus
(still no AOBs for me)
pep.
# Close
pep.
Thanks all.
Seve
Same, thank you.
emus
Thanks
pep.
emus, personally I'm happy for you to comment on list for example against minutes or the like if you can't attend a specific meeting
pep.
It would have the same value to me
emus
sure
pep.
(I'm also open to moving the time of the meeting, but it seems it's not possible for other board members so that's it)
emus
no, just leave it
Guus
If anything, I'd prefer to make these meetings shorter - less discussing things, but more deciding on things. If we can move the 'discussion' bit elsewhere, that'd benefit us, I think.
pep.
Guus, I've been hinting at using the list for most things :x
emus
is fine for the moment. I woulf rather ask if member have expectations to attend to meetings like this✎
emus
is fine for the moment. I would rather ask if member have expectations to attend to meetings like this ✏
pep.
But it seems people want to meet here anyway
emus
> If anything, I'd prefer to make these meetings shorter - less discussing things, but more deciding on things. If we can move the 'discussion' bit elsewhere, that'd benefit us, I think.
👍
Guus
pep. I think doing more discussion on-list is good. We'd still need the meetings to formally agree to stuff. I'm just afraid that we're running on fumes, resource wise.
Zash
Are board meeting agendas posted to the list(s)?
pep.
To the list no, it's still trello
pep.
Maybe we should petition the chair to send agendas :)
Zash
I do like the way jonas’ posts the Council agenda in advance
Zash
to the list(s) specifically
pep.
Yeah I agree. And technically bylaws says something something 3 days in advance
Guus
me too. to be fair, Council pre-Jonas did the same.
Guus
maybe board has let things slide a bit - might be good to pick that up.