XSF Discussion - 2020-06-26

  1. moparisthebest

    I wanted to point out a potentially relevant conversation from another MUC: a: Does anyone know why XEP-387 (compliance suites) was obsoleted? It seems like a good idea to have a standard checklist b: I recommend XEP-0423 instead, a a: Ah, yearly updates. Too bad there isn't an "obsoleted by" note could be something helpful to add

  2. Ge0rG

    moparisthebest: it's well hidden in the appendix, https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0423.html#appendix-docinfo

  3. pep.

    https://github.com/xsf/xeps/issues/888 moparisthebest, if somebody wants to tackle this

  4. Ge0rG

    Oh look, there is an issue for that!

  5. pep.

    Now we need a solver

  6. jonas’

    moparisthebest, we do have superseded-by fields

  7. jonas’

    it’s even filled in

  8. pep.

    In a similar domain, https://github.com/xsf/xeps/issues/738

  9. pep.

    moparisthebest, if you're up for it :P

  10. moparisthebest

    so I guess, needs to be made more prominent, and what about a link?

  11. jonas’

    I hope when we have got more stuff automated, that I can repurpose my weekly slot to do some actual improvements

  12. pep.

    moparisthebest, a link?

  13. jonas’

    pep., it could be made an <a href/> if the superseded-by is a XEP

  14. moparisthebest

    pep., from https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0387.html none of the references to ... yep ^

  15. pep.

    yeah that's why I asked. It can be generated

  16. pep.

    It "just" needs to be done