-
moparisthebest
I wanted to point out a potentially relevant conversation from another MUC: a: Does anyone know why XEP-387 (compliance suites) was obsoleted? It seems like a good idea to have a standard checklist b: I recommend XEP-0423 instead, a a: Ah, yearly updates. Too bad there isn't an "obsoleted by" note could be something helpful to add
-
Ge0rG
moparisthebest: it's well hidden in the appendix, https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0423.html#appendix-docinfo
-
pep.
https://github.com/xsf/xeps/issues/888 moparisthebest, if somebody wants to tackle this
-
Ge0rG
Oh look, there is an issue for that!
-
pep.
Now we need a solver
-
jonas’
moparisthebest, we do have superseded-by fields
-
jonas’
it’s even filled in
-
pep.
In a similar domain, https://github.com/xsf/xeps/issues/738
-
pep.
moparisthebest, if you're up for it :P
-
moparisthebest
so I guess, needs to be made more prominent, and what about a link?
-
jonas’
I hope when we have got more stuff automated, that I can repurpose my weekly slot to do some actual improvements
-
pep.
moparisthebest, a link?
-
jonas’
pep., it could be made an <a href/> if the superseded-by is a XEP
-
moparisthebest
pep., from https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0387.html none of the references to ... yep ^
-
pep.
yeah that's why I asked. It can be generated
-
pep.
It "just" needs to be done