> Version 0.3.0 (2018-07-31)
> Make examples show items published to the id "current", as per XEP-0060 §12.20.
> (egp)
> Version 0.2.2 (2018-11-03)
From xep-0384. I assume there is something wrong with the dates as the latest revision is older than the previous.
Nekithas joined
alexishas left
debaclehas joined
j.rhas left
j.rhas joined
APachhas left
Shellhas joined
LNJhas joined
andrey.ghas joined
APachhas joined
karoshihas joined
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
alexishas joined
archas left
archas joined
archas left
archas joined
Jeybehas left
Jeybehas joined
neshtaxmpphas joined
lobodelrayohas left
Steve Killehas left
lobodelrayohas joined
debaclehas left
lobodelrayohas left
karoshihas left
karoshihas joined
stpeterhas joined
Steve Killehas joined
karoshihas left
karoshihas joined
stpeterhas left
debaclehas joined
mimi89999has joined
andyhas left
APachhas left
APachhas joined
karoshihas left
karoshihas joined
andrey.ghas left
wurstsalathas left
wurstsalathas joined
archas left
archas joined
archas left
archas joined
adiaholic_has left
adiaholic_has joined
robertooohas joined
Nekithas left
Nekithas joined
goffihas joined
APachhas left
flow
!XSF_Martin, the dates show when the change was authored, not when it was accepted
lskdjfhas joined
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
APachhas joined
karoshihas left
karoshihas joined
andyhas joined
!XSF_Martin
Ok, thanks.
Kev
I'm not sure it *should* be the date it was authored, mind :)
archas left
archas joined
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
archas left
archas joined
karoshihas left
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
!XSF_Martinhas left
!XSF_Martinhas joined
karoshihas joined
flow
Personally, I don't care
neshtaxmpphas left
wurstsalathas left
wurstsalathas joined
APachhas left
APachhas joined
emushas left
emushas joined
adiaholic_has left
adiaholic_has joined
govanifyhas left
govanifyhas joined
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
stpeterhas joined
nycohas joined
wurstsalathas left
wurstsalathas joined
APachhas left
jonas’
the only thing annoying about those dates is that everyone complains about them
jonas’
please, if you have strong opinions about it, raise them on a list which can pin down what the date is supposed to mean
jonas’
since this would be XEP-0001 territory, that is Board
stpeterhas left
APachhas joined
APachhas left
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
paulhas left
paulhas joined
krauqhas left
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
adiaholic_has left
adiaholic_has joined
Andrzejhas left
paulhas left
paulhas joined
APachhas joined
paulhas left
krauqhas joined
paulhas joined
APachhas left
Shellhas left
Shellhas joined
archas left
archas joined
archas left
archas joined
Neustradamus
!XSF_Martin: There is timeline problem in XEP-0384 (and other XEPs), I have signaled in this MUC Room and here: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/issues/966
Neustradamus
I am very happy about your message :)
Neustradamus
-> https://i.ibb.co/H40xXmR/Timeline-example.png
Neustradamus
About XEP-0390: https://i.ibb.co/12TcWX0/Timeline-XEP-0390.png
APachhas joined
xeckshas left
xeckshas joined
!XSF_Martin
Neustradamus: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/issues/966#issuecomment-648374775
I didn't know this.
!XSF_Martin
With this explanation I now know it doesn't have to be in the chronological order.
Neustradamus
The problem is: it is the modification commit date and not the publication/announcement date, the commit of the editor is missing.