XSF Discussion - 2020-08-30

  1. Link Mauve

    edhelas, these URIs have been supported for decades, I remember using those back in 2010 or so.

  2. Link Mauve

    SàT also probably does.

  3. pep.

    Well Movim and Sàt are probably about the two only clients handling them tbh

  4. pep.

    At least in the free software world

  5. Link Mauve

    pep., my blog engine from a decade ago also did.

  6. pep.

    yay

  7. pep.

    3!

  8. arc

    and I am back

  9. Guus

    Hi arc

  10. Guus

    How are things?

  11. arc

    I got my server back up

  12. arc

    I foolishly tried to do a remote upgrade

  13. Guus

    Classic mistake

  14. xsf

    whats a remote upgrade?

  15. Guus

    Updating software on a machine that's physically far away or hard to reach.

  16. guus.der.kinderen

    What causes the recently renewed entry for Spark to not pop up on https://xmpp.org/software/clients.html ?

  17. Zash

    has the website been re-built and re-deployed?

  18. guus.der.kinderen

    no idea

  19. guus.der.kinderen

    didn't the docker thingy do that automatically?

  20. Zash

    one can dream

  21. guus.der.kinderen

    or did that stop working after the latest rework ?

  22. Zash gives it a swift kick in the docker

  23. Zash

    guus.der.kinderen: looks like it showed up now, for some unknown reason

  24. guus.der.kinderen

    yey

  25. guus.der.kinderen

    thanks

  26. guus.der.kinderen

    hargh, I missed the Openfire renewal thingy

  27. Zash

    oh no

  28. Ge0rG

    Maybe it just takes a small eternity to build?

  29. eta

    Zash, could we not move xmpp.org to netlify or something

  30. eta

    or, like ghpages

  31. guus.der.kinderen

    We can, but I wonder if it's worth the effort? Also: I expect others to have other personal preferences.

  32. Zash

    Someone™ just needs to take the time to set some automation

  33. MattJ

    The effort to move is almost certainly higher than the effort to restore automated deploys