XSF Discussion - 2020-11-08

  1. marc

    Ge0rG, I implemented 389 in Dino in 22h ;)

  2. marc

    TBH a bit hacky but no big changes were necessary

  3. lovetox

    and is there a module for a server available also?

  4. Ge0rG

    marc: that's 20h more than I needed for the IBR token... đŸ˜‰

  5. marc

    lovetox, Yes, the IQ part is not implemented yet but it is sufficient to test against

  6. marc

    Ge0rG, probably but I find that's quite fast given that I never worked on the Dino code base nor with Vala

  7. Ge0rG

    marc: also 389 doesn't even have the token based flow defined, right?

  8. Zash

    More XEPs needed‽

  9. marc

    Ge0rG: no, but once 389 is implemented it is quite easy to extend it. On client and server side

  10. marc

    The only reason my ejabberd implementation has no token support is some internal database "problem" in ejabberd

  11. Ge0rG

    marc: well, let's talk again once 389 is implemented in all major servers and client libraries, right? ;)

  12. Ge0rG

    it's out there since early 2017 after all

  13. marc

    Ge0rG, sure, because there is no real demand except for invitations, at the moment