A question for XEP-0384 ( OMEMO ) - Section: 5.3.1 Device list
NOTE: as per XEP-0060 §12.20, it is RECOMMENDED for the publisher to specify an ItemID of "current" to ensure that the publication of a new item will overwrite the existing item.
Is it a RECOMMENDED or should it be a MUST?
Steve Killehas joined
florettahas left
lorddavidiiihas left
goffihas joined
flow
DebXWoody, well the protocol won't break if you don't follow this, only the pubsub node will accumulate more (unnecessary) items over time. IMHO that does not justify a MUST, not even a SHOULD
flow
hence RECOMMENDED seems to be sensible in this case
moparisthebesthas left
DebXWoody
flow, "the protocol won't break" I agree. But OMEMO won't work well, I guess. On functional point of view there should be just *one* device list per account. Am I right? The protocol should define the technical way to find a solution of the functional requirement. If the should be *exactly one* device list, the protocol should say this also. ( This is what I think)
If it is recommended, how should I manage the different devicelists? Just merge all?
Zash
The server might have default of 1 max items.
APachhas left
flow
DebXWoody, there is only one valid device list: the one in the latest item of the pubsub node
lorddavidiiihas joined
flow
possible that the XEP should spell that out explicitly. it is probably not done since it is a reoccuring design pattern in XMPP
emushas joined
Andrzejhas joined
DebXWoody
Thx, I need to investigate with the user and try to fix the implementation.
moparisthebesthas joined
Lancehas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
APachhas joined
LNJhas joined
debaclehas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
Andrzejhas left
APachhas left
jonas’
flow, FWIW, RECOMMENDED == SHOULD
flow
right, i always get that wrong
Zash
So it's probably fine.
lorddavidiiihas joined
APachhas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
moparisthebesthas left
moparisthebesthas joined
Alexhas left
Alexhas joined
Andrzejhas joined
stpeterhas joined
stpeterhas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
Steve Killehas left
Steve Killehas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
florettahas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
lskdjfhas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
raghavgururajanhas left
neshtaxmpphas joined
raghavgururajanhas joined
florettahas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
florettahas joined
pasdesushihas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
pasdesushihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
pasdesushihas joined
neshtaxmpphas left
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
florettahas left
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
stpeterhas joined
stpeterhas left
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
Dele Olajidehas joined
Andrzejhas left
DebXWoodyhas left
wladmishas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
neshtaxmpphas joined
nad287has joined
Andrzejhas joined
nad287has left
APachhas left
Andrzejhas left
APachhas joined
pasdesushihas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
wladmishas left
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
pasdesushihas left
lorddavidiiihas left
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
florettahas joined
paulhas left
DebXWoodyhas joined
lovetoxhas joined
paulhas joined
wladmishas joined
wladmishas left
wladmishas joined
Adihas left
Adihas joined
neshtaxmpphas left
lovetoxhas left
neshtaxmpphas joined
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
stpeterhas joined
stpeterhas left
florettahas left
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
chronosx88has joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
pasdesushihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
intosihas left
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
nad287has joined
nad287has left
archas left
archas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
intosihas joined
pasdesushihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
Calvinhas joined
archas left
archas joined
archas left
archas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
alex-a-sotohas left
alex-a-sotohas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
florettahas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
stpeterhas joined
stpeterhas left
pasdesushihas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
Sevehas left
Sevehas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
vanitasvitaehas left
Neustradamushas left
Neustradamushas joined
vanitasvitaehas joined
nad287has joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
Wojtekhas joined
Andrzejhas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
Zash
Ge0rG, re ibr-token, do you happen to know if there's like research or something in that direction saying that captchas are terrible?
Ge0rG
Zash: I'm sure there is. I only have first-party anecdata.
Zash
Non-blocking but I think it'd be nice to have that claim backed up by something.
DebXWoodyhas left
Zash
Hm, is there a way to express "here's an endpoint with SASL ANONYMOUS you can connect to" with XMPP URIs?
DebXWoodyhas joined
Ge0rG
Zash: I don't think so, but you might use something like xmpp://domain
Ge0rG
technically, that'd mean connect by xmpp with no or default username / password
stpeterhas joined
stpeterhas left
DebXWoodyhas left
jonas’
is that true?
Zash
Yes
Zash
Same way http://example means to connect there with http
Steve Killehas left
Neustradamus
Lance has solved a lot of problems today (all tickets have been closed), but how to test it to confirm?
- https://github.com/legastero/stanza/
Zash
Anyone have anything to say about the compliance suite?