XSF Discussion - 2020-11-25


  1. Wojtek has left
  2. Andrzej has left
  3. intosi has joined
  4. NosoyHacker404 has left
  5. emus has left
  6. wevifa has joined
  7. NosoyHacker404 has joined
  8. Andrzej has joined
  9. govanify has left
  10. govanify has joined
  11. intosi has left
  12. Andrzej has left
  13. Andrzej has joined
  14. Andrzej has left
  15. Andrzej has joined
  16. krauq has left
  17. krauq has joined
  18. NosoyHacker404 has left
  19. krauq has left
  20. krauq has joined
  21. debacle has left
  22. intosi has joined
  23. NosoyHacker404 has joined
  24. wevifa has left
  25. Andrzej has left
  26. Lance has left
  27. intosi has left
  28. Seve has left
  29. andrey.g has left
  30. Adi has left
  31. Adi has joined
  32. alameyo has left
  33. alameyo has joined
  34. intosi has joined
  35. krauq has left
  36. krauq has joined
  37. wevifa has joined
  38. krauq has left
  39. krauq has joined
  40. govanify has left
  41. govanify has joined
  42. intosi has left
  43. NosoyHacker404 has left
  44. NosoyHacker404 has joined
  45. intosi has joined
  46. Zash has left
  47. Arne has left
  48. intosi has left
  49. Arne has joined
  50. govanify has left
  51. govanify has joined
  52. intosi has joined
  53. wevifa has left
  54. Seve has joined
  55. intosi has left
  56. Andrzej has joined
  57. raghavgururajan has left
  58. raghavgururajan has joined
  59. raghavgururajan has left
  60. raghavgururajan has joined
  61. intosi has joined
  62. Andrzej has left
  63. jcbrand has joined
  64. adiaholic has left
  65. adiaholic has joined
  66. intosi has left
  67. wevifa has joined
  68. adiaholic has left
  69. adiaholic has joined
  70. wevifa has left
  71. neshtaxmpp has left
  72. intosi has joined
  73. adiaholic has left
  74. adiaholic has joined
  75. intosi has left
  76. winfried has left
  77. winfried has joined
  78. wevifa has joined
  79. krauq has left
  80. krauq has joined
  81. intosi has joined
  82. NosoyHacker404 has left
  83. neshtaxmpp has joined
  84. Seve has left
  85. NosoyHacker404 has joined
  86. intosi has left
  87. wladmis has joined
  88. Andrzej has joined
  89. jcbrand has left
  90. intosi has joined
  91. Mikaela has joined
  92. lovetox has joined
  93. Maranda has left
  94. lorddavidiii has joined
  95. mimi89999 has left
  96. Andrzej has left
  97. mimi89999 has joined
  98. Seve has joined
  99. intosi has left
  100. adiaholic has left
  101. adiaholic has joined
  102. j.r has joined
  103. govanify has left
  104. govanify has joined
  105. emus has joined
  106. Tobias has joined
  107. j.r has left
  108. intosi has joined
  109. j.r has joined
  110. Andrzej has joined
  111. emus lskdjf: thanks I see
  112. krauq has left
  113. krauq has joined
  114. krauq has left
  115. krauq has joined
  116. lovetox has left
  117. intosi has left
  118. Andrzej has left
  119. Link Mauve has left
  120. Alex has joined
  121. wurstsalat has joined
  122. intosi has joined
  123. Alex In the Agenda I just use the template which we used forever. We can get rid of the NO column for board and council votes
  124. chronosx88 has joined
  125. Alex emus: ya, we can add a section to the newsletter, I can work on it
  126. intosi has left
  127. lorddavidiii has left
  128. jcbrand has joined
  129. lorddavidiii has joined
  130. adiaholic has left
  131. adiaholic has joined
  132. intosi has joined
  133. lorddavidiii has left
  134. lorddavidiii has joined
  135. intosi has left
  136. emus has left
  137. intosi has joined
  138. Maranda has joined
  139. Ge0rG has left
  140. intosi has left
  141. Andrzej has joined
  142. Ge0rG has joined
  143. mdosch has left
  144. Zash has joined
  145. mdosch has joined
  146. lorddavidiii has left
  147. debacle has joined
  148. nyco has left
  149. nyco has joined
  150. adiaholic has left
  151. adiaholic has joined
  152. Andrzej has left
  153. intosi has joined
  154. lorddavidiii has joined
  155. Nekit has left
  156. Nekit has joined
  157. intosi has left
  158. intosi has joined
  159. Andrzej has joined
  160. lorddavidiii has left
  161. moparisthebest has left
  162. moparisthebest has joined
  163. adiaholic has left
  164. adiaholic has joined
  165. lorddavidiii has joined
  166. emus has joined
  167. lorddavidiii has left
  168. Zash has left
  169. Zash has joined
  170. emus Alex: ok cool
  171. lskdjf has joined
  172. emus Alex: yes, as this seemingly just counts how much havent placed a vote for them I think its misleading. Id rather say how many peoplr voted, and then place the table with number of votes per person.
  173. Zash has left
  174. Zash has joined
  175. Daniel The label might be slightly misleading but I do find that information useful
  176. Daniel Even though you can of course derive it by subtracting the yeses from the total
  177. Zash has left
  178. Zash has joined
  179. Daniel Maybe not necessarily for the news letter tho (I just realized that you were probably talking about that)
  180. Zash has left
  181. Zash has joined
  182. eevvoor has joined
  183. antranigv has joined
  184. LNJ has joined
  185. lorddavidiii has joined
  186. emus Daniel: I was talking about the wiki page. But I dont see the sense of placing the no if the only user action is to place a vote for people. In general election also place only who voted for one, not how many did not vote for him. (right?)
  187. Maranda has left
  188. Maranda has joined
  189. alex-a-soto has left
  190. adiaholic has left
  191. adiaholic has joined
  192. alex-a-soto has joined
  193. wevifa has left
  194. jonas’ emus, I think you need at least half of the votes in addition to being in the top 5
  195. jonas’ so listing the No column also makes it clear whether that criterium is fulfilled or not
  196. jonas’ > Third, the individuals elected shall be those receiving the highest percentage of votes cast, up to the limit set by the Members and with the proviso that no individual receiving less than a majority of votes cast shall be elected.
  197. Andrzej has left
  198. Andrzej has joined
  199. jonas’ though....
  200. jonas’ oh my
  201. larma The lack of possibility to vote yes/no/absent explicitly actually can have real world consequences. Should we ever end up with significantly more candidates than number of votes you have, many will not make the 50% limit.
  202. dwd larma, That's be a lovely problem to have, mind.
  203. jonas’ I’m also fairly certain that we’re doing it wrong
  204. jonas’ reading Section 3.13
  205. jonas’ Section 3.13 Voting Procedure for Election of Board and Council. Election of individuals to serve on the Board of Directors and on the XMPP Council shall proceed as follows. First, the number of individuals to serve on each body shall be limited beforehand by the Members as specified in Section 4.4 and Section 8.1 of these Bylaws for the Board and Council, respectively. Second, the Members shall vote on the candidates standing for election in accordance with Section 3.9 of these Bylaws. Third, the individuals elected shall be those receiving the highest percentage of votes cast, up to the limit set by the Members and with the proviso that no individual receiving less than a majority of votes cast shall be elected. Fourth, in the case of a tie for the final remaining position, the final individual shall be chosen in accordance with the procedures defined in “RFC 3797: Publicly Verifiable Nominations Committee (NomCom) Random Selection” published by the Internet Engineering Task Force.
  206. jonas’ nothing in here says that we can only cast N (= number of seats) votes
  207. Ge0rG The vote was rigged!
  208. jonas’ Section 3.9 just says that each member gets a single vote: > Section 3.9 Voting. Each current Member of the Corporation (other than Emeritus Members) shall be entitled to one (1) vote on each matter submitted to a vote at a meeting of the Members, except as may otherwise be provided in the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
  209. jonas’ that was a rabbit hole I did not want to discover
  210. Andrzej has left
  211. Andrzej has joined
  212. emus > emus, I think you need at least half of the votes in addition to being in the top 5 > so listing the No column also makes it clear whether that criterium is fulfilled or not But dont you need the total number of person voted for this criterium?
  213. jonas’ emus, that is Yes + No
  214. emus 😄
  215. emus Okay. but then I would place the total number directlt, because it looks like "No" is an active choice
  216. jonas’ true
  217. emus Okay. but then I would place the total number directly, because it looks like "No" is an active choice
  218. Andrzej has left
  219. Andrzej has joined
  220. Andrzej has left
  221. Andrzej has joined
  222. Andrzej has left
  223. Andrzej has joined
  224. adiaholic has left
  225. adiaholic has joined
  226. lorddavidiii has left
  227. lorddavidiii has joined
  228. alameyo has left
  229. adiaholic has left
  230. adiaholic has joined
  231. krauq has left
  232. alameyo has joined
  233. krauq has joined
  234. Andrzej has left
  235. Andrzej has joined
  236. Andrzej has left
  237. Andrzej has joined
  238. adiaholic has left
  239. adiaholic has joined
  240. Andrzej has left
  241. Andrzej has joined
  242. dwd emus, FWIW, it used to be an active choice - the memberbot used to just ask yes/no for each candidate, so you could (and people did) vote for 4, or 6, people. I'm happy to look into changing the memberbot back to doing that, though obviously I'd raise this with Board and Alex (as Secretary) first.
  243. jonas’ dwd, from my reading of the Bylaws, the previous mode you describe is the one which matches the bylaws
  244. jonas’ while the current mode does not
  245. Andrzej has left
  246. Andrzej has joined
  247. emus I understand one have maximum 5 vote options. Sure, one might not vote for everyone, but that is an abstention not a "No"-vote or vote against one (as I first interpreted the table)
  248. jonas’ emus, I do not understand that from the Bylaws
  249. Andrzej has left
  250. Andrzej has joined
  251. dwd emus, Well, as jonas’ says, there's no "maximum number of votes" mentioned in the bylaws.
  252. jonas’ recount! recount!
  253. emus But I thought board and council are limited to 5 persons each
  254. jonas’ yes
  255. jonas’ but the voting scheme still says you vote yes/no (abstain?) for each candidate
  256. jonas’ and then the five with the highest ratio of yes votes get the seats
  257. Daniel > emus, FWIW, it used to be an active choice - the memberbot used to just ask yes/no for each candidate, so you could (and people did) vote for 4, or 6, people. I'm happy to look into changing the memberbot back to doing that, though obviously I'd raise this with Board and Alex (as Secretary) first. It may match the bylaws but I find that odd. If anything I'd prefer switching to ranked choice or something
  258. jonas’ which is different from "you select 5 candidates which counts +1 for each and the five with the highest number of +1 get the seats"
  259. dwd emus, Sure. But - arguably - that could be found by everyone voting uniformly for every candidate and then randomly selecting via RFC 3797.
  260. jonas’ Daniel, agreed, ranked choice would be better than either system (but also much more complex to evaluate)
  261. emus ^^
  262. jonas’ nevertheless: I think we do have a massive legal issue if our voting procedure diverges from what the Bylaws say
  263. emus Maybe Im just a bit confused
  264. emus > nevertheless: I think we do have a massive legal issue if our voting procedure diverges from what the Bylaws say I guess this should be discussed first
  265. jonas’ by whom?
  266. Andrzej has left
  267. Andrzej has joined
  268. jonas’ the possibly not-legally-elected board? :-
  269. jonas’ the possibly not-legally-elected board? :-)
  270. emus 🤷‍♂️
  271. Daniel Because if I _could_ vote +1 for each I either have to make an active choice not to vote someone in or just give anyone a +1. On the other hand if I only have 5 votes in total its just a 'I prefer x over z' instead of an 'I hate x'
  272. emus Alex?
  273. jonas’ Daniel, that’d give some higher weight to the people who *do* make an active choice instead of just selecting the first five people memberbot comes up with
  274. dwd jonas’, Given the Board couldn't have changed given a yes/no vote, it's Council are are potentially not legit, but still. :-)
  275. jonas’ dwd, true
  276. Daniel > Daniel, that’d give some higher weight to the people who *do* make an active choice instead of just selecting the first five people memberbot comes up with Well that's just an argument for making it random
  277. jonas’ dwd, though the bylaw voting scheme does encourage no votes more than the current one
  278. dwd In any event, as I say I'm happy to raise this at Board.
  279. jonas’ Daniel, it is random already :)
  280. emus jonas’: one can randomise the listing^^
  281. jonas’ dwd, good :)
  282. jonas’ emus, see above :)
  283. emus ah
  284. dwd emus, The listing *is* randomized already.
  285. jonas’ dwd, will you be part of council?
  286. emus yep good
  287. Andrzej has left
  288. Andrzej has joined
  289. Andrzej has left
  290. Andrzej has joined
  291. j.r has left
  292. j.r has joined
  293. Andrzej has left
  294. govanify has left
  295. govanify has joined
  296. dwd jonas’, Seems so. I was expecting to be voted off, actually, but I'm happy I've not been. We'll need someone else to act as Liaision to Board though, otherwise I'll have conflicts in meetingts, but ordinarily that's the Council Chair anyway, and I'm hoping you'll continue that.
  297. govanify has left
  298. govanify has joined
  299. jonas’ dwd, ok
  300. neshtaxmpp has left
  301. Alex has left
  302. Adi has left
  303. Adi has joined
  304. wladmis has left
  305. Alex has joined
  306. Alex emus: in meetings all day, will read here later when I am available
  307. emus sure
  308. Nekit has left
  309. Nekit has joined
  310. neshtaxmpp has joined
  311. krauq has left
  312. krauq has joined
  313. Zash has left
  314. Zash has joined
  315. wladmis has joined
  316. neshtaxmpp has left
  317. eevvoor has left
  318. eevvoor has joined
  319. moparisthebest has left
  320. moparisthebest has joined
  321. Link Mauve has joined
  322. neshtaxmpp has joined
  323. larma has left
  324. larma has joined
  325. wladmis has left
  326. wladmis has joined
  327. lorddavidiii has left
  328. adiaholic has left
  329. adiaholic has joined
  330. wladmis has left
  331. Andrzej has joined
  332. lorddavidiii has joined
  333. Andrzej has left
  334. wladmis has joined
  335. wladmis has left
  336. Andrzej has joined
  337. Andrzej has left
  338. Andrzej has joined
  339. wladmis has joined
  340. papatutuwawa has joined
  341. Andrzej has left
  342. Andrzej has joined
  343. Andrzej has left
  344. Andrzej has joined
  345. intosi has left
  346. wladmis has left
  347. Andrzej has left
  348. Andrzej has joined
  349. SamWhited oh neat. So if I understood that, the system we're supposed to have where you could just vote for everybody is called 'approval voting'. It's my favorite voting system and I always wondered why we modified it and limited you to 5 votes
  350. Andrzej has left
  351. Andrzej has joined
  352. Andrzej has left
  353. Andrzej has joined
  354. Andrzej has left
  355. Andrzej has joined
  356. SamWhited Although I also thought we used a modified ranked choice too and that the order mattered just because memberbot seems to suggest it does, but I guess thinking back obviously that wasn't true because the results didn't show that ever. Not sure why I never realized that.
  357. Andrzej has left
  358. Andrzej has joined
  359. intosi has joined
  360. lorddavidiii has left
  361. wladmis has joined
  362. floretta has left
  363. floretta has joined
  364. eevvoor has left
  365. Andrzej has left
  366. Andrzej has joined
  367. wladmis has left
  368. papatutuwawa has left
  369. intosi has left
  370. intosi has joined
  371. intosi has left
  372. lorddavidiii has joined
  373. intosi has joined
  374. Arne has left
  375. Arne has joined
  376. Steve Kille has left
  377. alex-a-soto has left
  378. alex-a-soto has joined
  379. Guus Am I reading https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0124.html#terminate correct like this? "When a client sends 'terminate', the server should not deliver any stanzas any longer"
  380. Andrzej has left
  381. Andrzej has joined
  382. Andrzej has left
  383. Andrzej has joined
  384. Andrzej has left
  385. Andrzej has joined
  386. lorddavidiii has left
  387. adiaholic has left
  388. Andrzej has left
  389. Andrzej has joined
  390. adiaholic has joined
  391. wladmis has joined
  392. lorddavidiii has joined
  393. Adi has left
  394. wladmis has left
  395. wladmis has joined
  396. Steve Kille has joined
  397. Adi has joined
  398. wladmis has left
  399. wladmis has joined
  400. Holger has left
  401. pasdesushi has joined
  402. eevvoor has joined
  403. wladmis has left
  404. neshtaxmpp has left
  405. neshtaxmpp has joined
  406. adiaholic has left
  407. Holger has joined
  408. pasdesushi has left
  409. APach has left
  410. Andrzej has left
  411. pasdesushi has joined
  412. wladmis has joined
  413. APach has joined
  414. flow FWIW "approval voting" and "condorcet voting" would be my favorites when it comes to voting for council and board (with a slight tendency towards condorcet)
  415. Wojtek has joined
  416. flow Guus, good question, I am not that much into BOSH, but I somehow would expect BOSH's 'terminate' to mimic </stream>, so it would be a unidirectional close
  417. flow Guus, in any way, this could probably be clarified in xep124
  418. adiaholic has joined
  419. Guus flow that was kind of my thinking (eg, I expected the server to be able to deliver a pending message or echo presence unavailalble), but that's not how I read this.
  420. SamWhited TIL: condorcet voting, this sounds neat (if a bit complicated to understand and implement compared to approval voting which seems pretty intuitive)
  421. Link Mauve Guus, also note that a client couldn’t assume that it won’t receive stanzas anymore, latency and all.
  422. flow SamWhited, ideally you can use a condorcet voting library instead of impl the whole thing. Understanding is a bit different, approval voting is far easier to understand. But OTOH condorcet voting is already used in tech communities (e.g. Debian, Jenkins)
  423. flow the stackexchange network also does condorcet voting (if I am not mistaken)
  424. SamWhited I didn't mean implement in terms of memberbot, I just meant "making the whole thing work and understood and contingencies for ties within an organization", sorry
  425. flow I see
  426. pasdesushi has left
  427. SamWhited Maybe it doesn't matter since what we have now is effectively approval voting but with ties already taken care of. Probably no need to change what isn't broken.
  428. SamWhited Interesting to think about though
  429. Kev Ties aren't taken care of, are they?
  430. Kev Or not by the voting mechanism itself, at least.
  431. SamWhited more-than-5-way-ties, I mean. If we have a tie in the top 5 it doesn't matter, but with regular approval voting if there are 6 candidates for 5 positions and all voters approve of all candidates you have to figure out what to do
  432. pasdesushi has joined
  433. Andrzej has joined
  434. SamWhited Actually, no, you're right, doesn't matter, we could still have a tie for 5th place, for example. Ignore me.
  435. SamWhited So we have approval voting with a weird restriction that I still don't fully understand :)
  436. Alex I updated our Agenda page and removed the No votes which memberbot is counting by default. Please take a look here: https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Meeting-Minutes-2020-11-24
  437. alex-a-soto has left
  438. alex-a-soto has joined
  439. Neustradamus SamWhited: My tickets has here :) - https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/issues/created_by/Neustradamus + This ticket here but not solved: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/issues/966
  440. Neustradamus SamWhited: My tickets are here :) - https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/issues/created_by/Neustradamus + This ticket here but not solved: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/issues/966
  441. Andrzej has left
  442. SamWhited Neustradamus: I don't have anything to do with that and can't help, sorry.
  443. SamWhited Also, reading the question, that issue *was* solved. The editors tried to explain how it's not a problem it looks like.
  444. Alex About the voting process. When there are any concerns then I would ask you to bring it to the member list for dicsussion. We are using the process as is for over a decade now. Which does not mean that there are still areas where we can learn, adjust and improve.
  445. SamWhited Alex: voting process seems fine, I don't think anyone is seriously talking about wanting to change it (although I can't speak for everyone of course). Just a fun discussion about how different voting systems would work :)
  446. Neustradamus SamWhited: https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/issues/421?
  447. Zash "Proponents of Condorcet can't decide on anything anyways" :P
  448. SamWhited Neustradamus: I don't understand what you're asking or what you want me to do. I am not an editor.
  449. Neustradamus SamWhited: it is linked to your ticket here: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/issues/992 :)
  450. SamWhited I know. I still don't understand what you're asking or what you want me to do.
  451. Alex SamWhited: just wanna make sure that all voices are heard. And when there are concerns that we discuss them, and not just silently ignore 😉
  452. SamWhited Indeed; thanks for doing that, and for continuing to do the elections and meetings and what not!
  453. wevifa has joined
  454. Andrzej has joined
  455. papatutuwawa has joined
  456. Andrzej has left
  457. Andrzej has joined
  458. pasdesushi has left
  459. floretta has left
  460. pasdesushi has joined
  461. pasdesushi has left
  462. pasdesushi has joined
  463. govanify has left
  464. govanify has joined
  465. pasdesushi has left
  466. Andrzej has left
  467. Andrzej has joined
  468. Andrzej has left
  469. Andrzej has joined
  470. Andrzej has left
  471. Andrzej has joined
  472. Andrzej has left
  473. Andrzej has joined
  474. Andrzej has left
  475. Andrzej has joined
  476. alex-a-soto has left
  477. alex-a-soto has joined
  478. APach has left
  479. govanify has left
  480. govanify has joined
  481. Andrzej has left
  482. Andrzej has joined
  483. Andrzej has left
  484. Andrzej has joined
  485. APach has joined
  486. lovetox has joined
  487. wevifa has left
  488. wevifa has joined
  489. alex-a-soto has left
  490. alex-a-soto has joined
  491. Andrzej has left
  492. Andrzej has joined
  493. pasdesushi has joined
  494. pasdesushi has left
  495. pasdesushi has joined
  496. Andrzej has left
  497. Andrzej has joined
  498. Shell has left
  499. Andrzej has left
  500. Andrzej has joined
  501. Andrzej has left
  502. Andrzej has joined
  503. Andrzej has left
  504. Andrzej has joined
  505. wladmis has left
  506. sonny has left
  507. sonny has joined
  508. wladmis has joined
  509. eta has left
  510. eta has joined
  511. Andrzej has left
  512. Andrzej has joined
  513. Andrzej has left
  514. pasdesushi has left
  515. Andrzej has joined
  516. Andrzej has left
  517. Andrzej has joined
  518. Andrzej has left
  519. Andrzej has joined
  520. Andrzej has left
  521. Andrzej has joined
  522. floretta has joined
  523. wevifa has left
  524. wevifa has joined
  525. Andrzej has left
  526. Andrzej has joined
  527. eta has left
  528. eta has joined
  529. Andrzej has left
  530. Andrzej has joined
  531. edw4rd has joined
  532. lskdjf has left
  533. lskdjf has joined
  534. Andrzej has left
  535. edw4rd hey guys
  536. Andrzej has joined
  537. edw4rd is ther anyone here ?
  538. edw4rd i need help
  539. edw4rd to add someone n this site
  540. edw4rd but idk how
  541. Andrzej has left
  542. Andrzej has joined
  543. edw4rd has left
  544. lskdjf has left
  545. lskdjf has joined
  546. papatutuwawa has left
  547. Andrzej has left
  548. Andrzej has joined
  549. lskdjf has left
  550. lskdjf has joined
  551. Andrzej has left
  552. Andrzej has joined
  553. lskdjf has left
  554. lskdjf has joined
  555. Kev has left
  556. lskdjf has left
  557. Steve Kille has left
  558. raghavgururajan has left
  559. raghavgururajan has joined
  560. lskdjf has joined
  561. Steve Kille has joined
  562. Nekit has left
  563. lorddavidiii has left
  564. Andrzej has left
  565. lorddavidiii has joined
  566. werdan has joined
  567. Steve Kille has left
  568. papatutuwawa has joined
  569. NosoyHacker404 has left
  570. NosoyHacker404 has joined
  571. pasdesushi has joined
  572. pasdesushi has left
  573. pasdesushi has joined
  574. pasdesushi has left
  575. Steve Kille has joined
  576. werdan has left
  577. Andrzej has joined
  578. j.r has left
  579. j.r has joined
  580. papatutuwawa has left
  581. papatutuwawa has joined
  582. intosi has left
  583. Steve Kille has left
  584. Andrzej has left
  585. lskdjf has left
  586. lskdjf has joined
  587. intosi has joined
  588. lovetox has left
  589. pasdesushi has joined
  590. adiaholic has left
  591. pasdesushi has left
  592. sonny has left
  593. sonny has joined
  594. intosi has left
  595. lovetox has joined
  596. eevvoor has left
  597. wevifa has left
  598. wevifa has joined
  599. Lance has joined
  600. chronosx88 has left
  601. j.r has left
  602. chronosx88 has joined
  603. Andrzej has joined
  604. Steve Kille has joined
  605. intosi has joined
  606. goffi has left
  607. pasdesushi has joined
  608. pasdesushi has left
  609. floretta has left
  610. floretta has joined
  611. wevifa has left
  612. Andrzej has left
  613. j.r has joined
  614. intosi has left
  615. chronosx88 has left
  616. david has left
  617. david has joined
  618. papatutuwawa has left
  619. Lance has left
  620. intosi has joined
  621. Lance has joined
  622. intosi has left
  623. Andrzej has joined
  624. wevifa has joined
  625. Alex has left
  626. lorddavidiii has left
  627. lorddavidiii has joined
  628. Andrzej has left
  629. Andrzej has joined
  630. Andrzej has left
  631. Andrzej has joined
  632. Shell has joined
  633. intosi has joined
  634. floretta has left
  635. Andrzej has left
  636. Andrzej has joined
  637. nyco has left
  638. nyco has joined
  639. Mikaela has left
  640. lovetox has left
  641. krauq has left
  642. krauq has joined
  643. floretta has joined
  644. intosi has left
  645. lskdjf has left
  646. lorddavidiii has left
  647. Wojtek has left
  648. Andrzej has left
  649. Tobias has left
  650. LNJ has left
  651. LNJ has joined
  652. wevifa has left
  653. intosi has joined
  654. wevifa has joined
  655. wurstsalat has left
  656. wurstsalat has joined
  657. jcbrand has left
  658. Nekit has joined
  659. wevifa has left
  660. wevifa has joined
  661. Alex has joined
  662. intosi has left
  663. emus has left
  664. emus has joined
  665. Alex has left
  666. deuill has joined
  667. Andrzej has joined
  668. intosi has joined
  669. Arne has left
  670. Arne has joined
  671. Lance has left
  672. deuill has left
  673. Andrzej has left
  674. wladmis has left
  675. wladmis has joined
  676. lskdjf has joined
  677. Andrzej has joined
  678. Lance has joined
  679. lskdjf has left
  680. krauq has left
  681. krauq has joined
  682. Lance has left
  683. debacle has left
  684. Andrzej has left
  685. Seve has left
  686. intosi has left
  687. Vaulor has left
  688. wladmis has left