XSF Discussion - 2020-11-27

The stream feature urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-session was defined in section 3 of RFC3921, but I think it has been dropped in 6120/21 ?

It is listed in https://xmpp.org/registrar/namespaces.html with a reference to 6121 - but that might be wrong?

Dropped yes. It didn't do anything.

Should the registrar be modified to refer back to RFC3921 instead of 6121?

🤷️

Guus, probably

maybe even add a hint towards dwd's I-D

Hmmm?

I'm thinking that the issue got introduced by having an XML entity to refer to RFCs. If that entity got updated from 3921 to 6121, all corresponding listings would get an auto-update.

I've raised this as https://github.com/xsf/registrar/issues/34

Ah, session. Yeah, one day we should revive that I-D and get it published.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cridland-xmpp-session-01 ?

yes, that

(in it's latest version, but I think that's -01)

Gosh that was a long time ago.

Why didn't we stuff 198 in that?

In session? I don't think anyone thought of that. Not a bad idea (though pontless now of course).

Guus: https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/issues/422

dwd: I always promote your draft to all. Examples: - https://github.com/djabberd/DJabberd/issues/38 - https://github.com/TelepathyIM/wocky/issues/3 - https://github.com/ekg2/ekg2/issues/58

Several tickets from me were originally on https://tracker.xmpp.org/ a long time ago.

On that note, you ever get your GitHub account back Neustradamus ?

Neustradamus all of your cross-references are quite confusing to me, especially since they do not include much of a description. I'm not sure what you mean.

Guus, that is the default state.

lovetox: if you want to play with xep389 and prosody https://gitlab.zapb.de/xmpp/prosody/-/tree/xep_389

thanks