Isn't it a bit weird for http upload to use iq type=get?
adiaholichas left
Zash
Depending on implementation, this may mutate state (quotas and such) on the server.
pasdesushihas left
Andrzejhas joined
pasdesushihas joined
adiaholichas joined
pasdesushihas left
j.rhas joined
j.rhas left
intosihas joined
j.rhas joined
Arnehas left
lovetoxhas left
Andrzejhas left
jonas’
it’s to cancel out the type=set in MAM
Zash
Hah
pasdesushihas joined
Arnehas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
intosihas left
lskdjfhas joined
intosihas joined
Vaulorhas left
florettahas joined
lovetoxhas joined
alex-a-sotohas left
alex-a-sotohas joined
Guushas left
Guushas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
Vaulorhas joined
intosihas left
j.rhas left
j.rhas joined
lovetoxhas left
alex-a-sotohas left
alex-a-sotohas joined
intosihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
Adihas left
Adihas joined
lovetoxhas joined
lskdjfhas left
j.rhas left
intosihas left
pasdesushihas left
intosihas joined
Arnehas left
MattJ
Does anyone know what's going on with FOSDEM this year?
MattJ
There was a call for devrooms, did the rtc room get applied for? Announcement of accepted rooms is overdue according to the last timeline they posted on fosdem.org
Link Mauve
Wasn’t it planned to be online? That is, devrooms would be a stream, possibly with an associated chat room.
MattJ
Yes
intosihas left
MattJ
Application process much the same though
intosihas joined
Link Mauve
Ok.
Arnehas joined
intosihas left
lovetoxhas left
lovetoxhas joined
lovetoxhas left
lskdjfhas joined
intosihas joined
lskdjfhas left
mukt2has joined
chronosx88has left
chronosx88has joined
intosihas left
Calvinhas joined
NosoyHacker404has left
NosoyHacker404has joined
Arnehas left
Arnehas joined
Arnehas left
Arnehas joined
pasdesushihas joined
Arnehas left
Arnehas joined
Arnehas left
Arnehas joined
Arnehas left
Arnehas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
Arnehas left
Arnehas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
intosihas joined
papatutuwawahas joined
papatutuwawahas left
papatutuwawahas joined
wevifahas left
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
Andrzejhas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
Arnehas left
Arnehas joined
wevifahas joined
pasdesushihas left
intosihas left
peetahhas left
Calvinhas left
intosihas joined
NosoyHacker404has left
papatutuwawahas left
lskdjfhas joined
peetahhas joined
lovetoxhas joined
lovetoxhas left
lovetoxhas joined
lovetoxhas left
lovetoxhas joined
lovetoxhas left
nycohas left
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
intosihas left
Arnehas left
Arnehas joined
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
jonashas joined
intosihas joined
Adihas left
nycohas joined
jonashas left
jonashas joined
Andrzejhas left
jonashas left
jonashas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
jonashas left
jonashas joined
intosihas left
Adihas joined
lovetoxhas joined
matkorhas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
intosihas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
Andrzejhas joined
papatutuwawahas joined
florettahas left
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
j.rhas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
intosihas left
j.rhas left
edhelashas left
alameyohas left
edhelashas joined
NosoyHacker404has joined
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
alameyohas joined
Andrzejhas left
lorddavidiiihas left
dwdhas left
intosihas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
pasdesushihas joined
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
dwdhas joined
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
intosihas left
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
andrey.ghas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
alex-a-sotohas left
andrey.ghas left
alex-a-sotohas joined
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
pasdesushihas left
intosihas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
NosoyHacker404has left
NosoyHacker404has joined
Yagizahas left
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
Andrzejhas joined
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
intosihas left
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
Andrzejhas left
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
intosihas joined
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
Andrzejhas joined
lskdjfhas left
intosihas left
pasdesushihas joined
focus121has left
focus121has joined
lovetoxhas left
andrey.ghas joined
pasdesushihas left
peetahhas left
peetahhas joined
Andrzejhas left
Neustradamus
It is possible to validate/merge this XEP-0384 PR in a 0.3.1 version?
- https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/894
It will be clear to all.
Thanks in advance.
alex-a-sotohas left
alex-a-sotohas joined
SamWhited
Neustradamus: that was all fixed a long time ago, read the comments on that PR. It's long out of date.
Neustradamus
SamWhited: Where?
The problem is that 0.4.0 OMEMO breaks current 0.3.0 OMEMO clients.
Mikaelahas left
intosihas joined
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
SamWhited
Neustradamus: the spec is long past that; there is no place to merge that PR. I'm not sure what you're even asking.
SamWhited
It's on like 0.7.0 now. We can't go back and re-release an old version.
Neustradamus
It is possible to add a 0.3.1 without break :)
SamWhited
How?
Neustradamus
The PR and the commit is already done
SamWhited
Where will you merge that PR? The branch has diverged significantly. 0.3.0 isn't a published version anymore.
pasdesushihas left
jcbrandhas left
lorddavidiiihas left
lovetoxhas joined
pasdesushihas joined
florettahas joined
dwdhas left
lorddavidiiihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
intosihas left
Neustradamus
The solution, better than nothing:
Duplication of https://github.com/xsf/xep-attic/blob/master/content/xep-0384-0.3.0.html to https://github.com/xsf/xep-attic/blob/master/content/xep-0384-0.3.1.html with the little change from Anu.
And we can insert the 0.3.1 revision part (at the good place - between 0.3.0 and 0.4.0) in 0.4.0 / 0.5.0 / 0.6.0 / 0.7.0 files.
And of course the revision part must be added in master without problem:
- https://github.com/xsf/xeps/blob/master/xep-0384.xml
neshtaxmpphas left
neshtaxmpphas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
SamWhited
ooh, you're wanting a new thing in the attic? I don't think that's a part of the XSF publication process and I don't know where that would even go in our Git history.
SamWhited
Sorry, it's just too late for that.
Neustradamus
Maybe the XSF can see for this missing part, and accept it.
I recall that this change will not break other versions, there is only a revision note in more.
pasdesushihas left
lskdjfhas joined
pasdesushihas joined
SamWhited
I'm not sure what to tell you. Even if we put a version in the attic for some reason (which would be meaningless and do nothing) there is nowhere to put it in git.
mihohas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
intosihas joined
lorddavidiiihas left
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
pasdesushihas left
pasdesushihas joined
Neustradamus
A duplication of https://github.com/xsf/xep-attic/blob/master/content/xep-0384-0.3.0.html to 0.3.1 with Anu changes
The block must be added in master in https://github.com/xsf/xeps/blob/master/xep-0384.xml between 0.3.0/0.4.0.
<revision>
<version>0.3.1</version>
<date>2020-03-05</date>
<initials>ap</initials>
<remark>Specify the size of the GCM iv to be 12 bytes.</remark>
</revision>
And it must be added in xep-attic for 0.4.0/0.5.0/0.6.0/0.7.0 files
There is no break.
Neustradamus
I have already spoken previously for date problem of publication...
Neustradamus
And we can see for example here:
- https://github.com/python/peps/blob/master/pep-0002.txt
"Created:" section
"Post-History:" section
SamWhited
That would be extremely confusing because a version block would just appear in master, a new document would appear in the attic, but there wouldn't be any corresponding version in the git history.
SamWhited
That is a python pep, not an XEP, I don't know how the Python community does things, but it's not necessarily the same as how the XMPP community does things. You have already had it explained to you by others why you were wrong about the date of publication problem before.
Neustradamus
Yes I know, but it is the solution.
dwdhas joined
SamWhited
It's not worth talking about it anymore. This is not a solution, I'm sorry. Maybe someone else will be able to convince you or will tell me I'm wrong.
Neustradamus
This problem has been done by XSF, XSF must to find the solution.
I recall, the PR was here before the 0.4.0.
larma
The PR was there before 0.4.0 and the responsible author decided to not accept it. The reason is even stated in a comment to the PR
larma
The problem you are talking about is a single client implementation deciding to be incompatible with the status quo of an experimental XEP (experimental = not for production). This is not an issue of the XSF.
hasa353nhas joined
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
Zash
I feel like this is what you get when you rush things.
pasdesushihas left
Zash
And OMEMO seems really rushed, and everyone pushing for it to be implemented by everyone contributed to that.
intosihas left
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
lskdjfhas left
lskdjfhas joined
Zash
Now for more appropriate saturday night issues, should I watch a movie or go to sleep?
larma
Zash, depends on the movie
Link Mauve
Depends on the sleep-deprivedness.
SamWhited
Was just typing that exact thing :)
Neustradamus
SamWhited: At the same time, I specify you that it is same for BitTorrent, example: https://github.com/bittorrent/bittorrent.org/blob/master/beps/bep_0005.rst :)
SamWhited
Neustradamus: that is also not the XSF. Their process is not ours. Also that link is meaningless and tells me nothing. I don't even understand what you're trying to convince us of by pointing us at other peoples documents.
papatutuwawahas left
Neustradamus
We can improve the system :)
SamWhited
This would not be an improvement, it would ruin our versioning.
hasa353nhas left
SamWhited
This is an experimental XEP that has moved on a long time ago, please let it go. If you want versioning to happen differently, you need to propose something to the board, not just send random links. I don't know what bittorrents versioning is like and that link you sent doesn't tell me so it's not very helpful.