XSF Discussion - 2020-12-11


  1. Guus

    I like how Google keeps insisting that I'm looking for a Vietnamese fried octopus dish, whenever I search for MUC MAM.

  2. Guus

    the bubble is failing.

  3. Guus

    Clients determine that a particular inbound message is a MUC PM by looking at it's type, right? Regular MUC messages have type='groupchat', while PMs have not?

  4. Zash

    PMs look like regular chat messages, which makes everything complicated if you don't know they come from a MUC

  5. Zash

    unless the MUC stamps them with that <{muc}x/> tag

  6. Ge0rG

    Guus: yes, and maybe one day every implementation will add that x tag

  7. Guus

    where's that tag specified?

  8. Zash

    https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#privatemessage

  9. Guus

    ah, missed it. thanx

  10. Guus

    In XEP-0045, this is specified: > If the room is non-anonymous, the service MAY include an Extended Stanza Addressing (XEP-0033) [16] element that notes the original full JID of the sender by means of the "ofrom" address type: This is limited to messages retrieved from history, though. MUC MAM doesn't reference this at all, but I'm thinking it'd be equally desirable there? Is there harm in slapping it onto live messages (for non-anon rooms), even if clients get to know about real JIDs through presence information?

  11. Zash

    It's redundant since this JIDs are available in presence/{muc#user}x/item/@jid

  12. Zash

    It's redundant since JIDs are available in presence/{muc#user}x/item/@jid in non-anon rooms

  13. Zash

    In semi-anon rooms you'd rather use occupant-id

  14. Guus

    I can see the redundancy - but I'm wondering if it'd hurt (apart from the obvious added weight to the stanzas).

  15. Ge0rG

    I wouldn't touch 0033 with a pole, it's based on RFC 822

  16. Ge0rG

    Also we had a nice security issue in 0313 where the server wasn't required to remove impersonation attacks from stored stanza

  17. ralphm

    Having a so-called shut-it-down-day, won't make it to the board meeting today.

  18. dwd

    ralphm, Is there an Agenda somewhere?

  19. ralphm

    Other than Trello, no

  20. arc

    Could be a short meeting then

  21. dwd

    arc, You want to chair?

  22. arc

    Sure why not. Do we even have quorum?

  23. dwd

    Only if we have MattJ or Seve.

  24. arc

    Seve, MattJ?

  25. MattJ

    Hey

  26. arc

    Hey MattJ if I'm not mistaken it's your turn to do minutes

  27. MattJ

    Ok

  28. dwd

    MattJ, On the plus side, should be an easy one.

  29. MattJ

    :)

  30. arc bangs gavel

  31. arc

    Roll call

  32. dwd

    Me!

  33. arc

    Seve are you present?

  34. arc

    For record, Ralph said he couldn't be here today

  35. Seve

    I am

  36. arc

    And MattJ is here doing minutes?

  37. MattJ

    Yep

  38. arc

    Ok. Since there are no tabled items from last week I think there's only one agenda item, but open call for others

  39. arc

    Fossdem and the devroom

  40. dwd

    arc, ralphm usually leads on FOSDEM etc, so that might be a problem discussing it.

  41. Seve

    Thought we left that for SCAM?

  42. Seve

    At least I would say last Board decided to leave this topic to SCAM

  43. dwd

    Yes, but IIRC, ralphm is our FOSDEM contact.

  44. arc

    I'm happy to leave it for SCAM. As much as I hate that acronym

  45. MattJ

    :)

  46. arc

    I still think we should have a vote for this year to delegate that to SCAM, get the ball rolling

  47. arc

    But are there any other topics to discuss this week?

  48. dwd

    Not that I know of.

  49. dwd

    (I mean, I do have things I'd like us to discuss, but I want to write a brief on them first)

  50. arc

    Ok then let's do this real fast

  51. arc

    1. Fosdem and the devroom

  52. arc

    I motion to officially delicate this to SCAM

  53. MattJ

    Seconded, +1

  54. dwd

    +1

  55. dwd

    Though I think you mean "delegate".

  56. arc

    +1 deligate yes

  57. Seve

    +1

  58. arc

    Passes.

  59. arc

    With no other business, +1 week

  60. arc

    Dwd do you want to put your agenda item in for next week?

  61. dwd

    arc, No, I need to write the brief first. So once I've written that we'll worry about an agenda item for it.

  62. arc

    Ok

  63. arc bangs gavel

  64. arc

    Done in 15

  65. MattJ

    Thanks o/

  66. Seve

    Have a good weekend everyone 🙂

  67. dwd

    Thanks, arc.

  68. arc

    I'm guessing we'll likely skip the week after next for the holidays

  69. arc

    Unless we want to have it on Christmas morning 😋

  70. arc

    And sorry for typos my phone's autocorrect gets in the way sometimes, especially since I added Norwegian to the language dictionary