jonas’for another org I volunteered with we had automated builds of every branch on staging.$domain/$branch/
edhelashas left
Neustradamushas left
LNJhas left
Andrzejhas joined
Adihas left
Neustradamushas joined
antranigvhas left
Adihas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
Marandahas left
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
Andrzejhas left
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
Marandahas joined
intosihas joined
mdoschhas left
edhelashas joined
mdoschhas joined
krauqhas left
krauqhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
intosihas left
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
Guushas joined
Andrzejhas joined
xeckshas left
mukt2has joined
inkyhas left
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
serge90has left
intosihas joined
andyhas left
andyhas joined
alex-a-sotohas left
lovetoxhas left
alex-a-sotohas joined
jcbrandhas joined
marekhas left
marekhas joined
intosihas left
andyhas left
moparisthebesthas left
Mikaelahas left
moparisthebesthas joined
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
nycohas joined
deuillhas left
nycohas left
Andrzejhas left
intosihas joined
deuillhas joined
andrey.ghas left
lovetoxhas joined
peetahhas left
intosihas left
Guushas left
debaclehas left
Andrzejhas joined
lovetoxhas left
Link MauveAlright, I’ve optimised the docker thing a bit, it doesn’t require an xmpp.org mount anymore, instead it will git pull its inside copy.
Link MauveAlso no more intermediary copy, I got told having multiple RUN commands will create as many intermediary copies.
Link MauveThe data used by https://linkmauve.fr/extensions/ are now generated from docker.
intosihas joined
marcLooks nice, the mix of logos and names is a bit confusing though
mukt2has left
Andrzejhas left
Link MauveThat’s because not all clients updated their DOAP with a logo yet.
Link Mauvemarc, how else would you represent them?
Guushas joined
mukt2has joined
intosihas left
Link MauveI’ve also tried playing with CSS to address lskdjf’s comments, but I only managed to make it worse.
DanielLink Mauve: BTW is Conversations doap file not working somehow?
DanielOr do I need to register the existence of the file somewhere?
Link MauveDaniel, you should add it to your entry at xmpp.org: https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/blob/master/data/clients.json#L139
Link MauveI don’t maintain a list of my own, instead I rely on xmpp.org’s data.
DanielI see. Thanks
Link MauveYou should move your logo property in the https://schema.org/ namespace, fyi.
Link MauveHere: https://github.com/iNPUTmice/Conversations/blob/master/doap.rdf#L25
Guushas left
Link MauveAlso reference your actual logo (SVG preferred), instead of the DOAP file itself. ^^
mathieui(you could have been forgiving and allowed the old logo description, so that it does not make a mixed mess until all your PRs get accepted :p)
moparisthebesthas left
xeckshas joined
Link Mauvemathieui, none of the projects which used my old xmpp:logo (which lasted for only one day) use it anymore.
Link MauveBoth Prosody, Gajim and poezio updated to the new one, while Dino skipped it altogether.
Link MauveBoth Prosody, Gajim and poezio updated to the new one, while Dino skipped the xmpp: one altogether.
Link MauveIn the first version I shared, I was fixing the DOAP files myself to add each project’s logo.
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
Link MauveExcept for slixmpp, which doesn’t have one.
MattJLink Mauve: maybe a fallback placeholder logo could be added? Or a coloured square with the initial of the project :)
Link MauveCode welcome!
Link MauveIn JS or Rust.
DanielI just hope we can merge this soon instead of forever trying to make it perfect
Andrzejhas joined
emushas left
moparisthebesthas joined
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
chronosx88has left
chronosx88has joined
MattJ+1
Guushas joined
MattJTo be clear, I'm not in a position to contribute code right now and neither will I object to it being merged without placeholder logos
MattJJust offering a suggestion about how to fix the visual issue (the best solution is for every project to have a logo)
MattJHaven't looked at the latest version but the one I saw was weird because it had the Prosody logo with 'slixmpp' after it sometimes
intosihas joined
MattJSeparate columns improve that, but still potential for confusion
adiaholichas left
mathieuiFWIW columns speraration is much better on the dark theme
adiaholichas joined
southerntofuhas joined
neshtaxmpphas left
neshtaxmpphas joined
intosihas left
neshtaxmpphas left
andyhas joined
paulhas left
Mikaelahas joined
paulhas joined
gavhas joined
gavhas left
Yagizahas left
Sevehas left
Vaulorhas left
emushas joined
wurstsalatmy proposal would be to show the count of supporting clients/servers/libs only. XEP pages already have a list of all the clients/... including their logos.
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
Link MauveOh right, I haven’t tried the light theme in a long while.
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
marcLink Mauve: have you tried sorting it by logo presence?
marcFirst all with logos and then all without
Link Mauvewurstsalat, I find that extremely dire and unhelpful tbh: https://linkmauve.fr/extensions/
gavhas joined
gavhas left
Link Mauvemarc, I expect this won’t be an issue anymore once all clients have a logo.
krauqhas left
krauqhas joined
intosihas joined
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
krauqhas left
krauqhas joined
etahas left
Link Mauvewurstsalat, here with a denominator giving the total amount of projects.
Link MauveMaybe I could do a percentage instead?
paulhas left
wurstsalatLink Mauve, it does not look as exciting, that’s right. but which info do you want the viewer to gather from a list with those logos? as soon as there are 7+ logos, you cannot display them nicely anymore.
Link MauveHere with a percentage.
marcLink Mauve, yep, probably that's true. Except if projects don't have a logo at all :)
chronosx88has left
chronosx88has joined
Link MauveAlthough now it doesn’t indicate which ones have a complete or partial implementation, hmm…
wurstsalatsince XEPs are for various use cases, I’d stay away from percentages :)
paulhas joined
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
Link MauveIndeed.
Link MauveRight, it’s back to a number of implementation.
wurstsalatif you’d be a viewer wanting to compare clients, it would be best to make the ones selectable you want to compare, since you cannot display every client logo at once. or am I getting this use-case wrong?
Ge0rGLink Mauve: filled horizontal bars with the width being proportional to the number of implementations!
Ge0rGwurstsalat: that's something I'd love to see in the implementations list
Andrzejhas left
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
Link MauvePatches welcome! I’m not very good at web stuff.
Link MauveBut I’d be fine with merging that stuff as is, and leave improvements for later.
etahas joined
wurstsalatLink Mauve, following that idea, you could for example select {Conversations, Dino}, display logos of just these two clients if they support the respective xep, and add a number afterwards for remaining clients (like this: "[logo1] [logo2] (6 more)". but yes, this sounds like something to implement later :)
intosihas left
inkyhas joined
Link MauveInteresting idea. :)
lorddavidiiihas left
SamWhitedIf you ignore the number afterwards you can probably do it all in just CSS with no JavaScript too.
Link MauveAtm the whole integration comes from JS though. :(
SamWhitedIntegration?
lovetoxhas joined
Link MauveFetching the JSON file from xmpp-doap and adding the Implementations column in the XEPs list, or the new table in each XEP.
SamWhitedoh, gotcha, that seems unfortunate.
Link MauveIndeed, I’d rather integrate it with Pelican (hence why I labeled this a proof of concept on standards@), but I’ve never been able to build our Pelican website so I’d rather not write code blind.
SamWhitedEither way, you can probably do the filtering part in CSS and it's one less thing to figure out how to integrate / move over later.
SamWhitedFiltering and/or overflow if there are too many logos.
Link MauveIndeed. :)
Link MauveOverflow I tried this morning, and couldn’t figure out how.
Link MauveI wanted overflow: auto, but it requires display: block, which then moves adjacent <td/> one below the other…
peetahhas joined
Sevehas joined
Vaulorhas joined
deuillhas left
antranigvhas joined
Link MauveAnother thing I plan to make with these data is an automated Compliance Suite marker in implementation lists.
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
intosihas joined
deuillhas joined
lorddavidiiihas joined
Andrzejhas joined
wurstsalatvery much yes! :)
wurstsalatany news on compliance badges btw?
Guushas left
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
intosihas left
waqashas joined
j.rhas left
j.rhas joined
neshtaxmpphas joined
paulhas left
paulhas joined
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
intosihas joined
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
intosihas left
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
Lancehas joined
Lancehas left
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
paulhas left
ZashI have a thing that can tell if you're compliant based on your doap
lovetoxhas left
intosihas joined
paulhas joined
DanielZash: is it a webservice?
govanifyhas left
govanifyhas joined
lovetoxhas joined
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
ZashMe? A website? Never.
intosihas left
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
Marandahas left
xeckshas left
Marandahas joined
xeckshas joined
stefanIs there a XEP to store URLs like defined in XEP-0048: Bookmarks?
It's out of scope for XEP-0402: PEP Native Bookmarks. But 0402 should be used instead of 0048. Is it correct?
stefanThe elements looks good. I thing a mimetype field would be nice. The XEP is about browsing - current activity - but should also work for storing information.
I just implemented 0048, I try to change it to those two XEPs. Thx.
Arnehas left
chronosx88has left
chronosx88has joined
Marandahas left
LNJhas joined
stefanOne more question. Is it possible to have a kind of real time sharing of a text file?
For instance, 5 people are working on a file at the same time.
intosihas left
Arnehas joined
stefanI was thinking to just share the content via a pubsub node item. But maybe there is another / better way to handel this.
govanifyhas left
govanifyhas joined
DanielIf you want this to be real time edits you probably need something more complex than just uploading the file to a pubsub node.
lionelexecrechas left
lionelexecrechas joined
DanielOther than that pubsub is not a bad choice I reckon
DanielAlso isn't there a collaboration edit xep already?