Zash, https://code.matthewwild.co.uk/clix/ shows last changes from 2014 and that thing still supports MAM?
nycohas joined
stphas joined
antranigvhas joined
Andrzejhas left
fuanahas joined
fuanahas left
Wojtekhas left
Andrzejhas joined
pierrehas joined
pierrehas left
nycohas left
Viktorhas left
nycohas joined
Mikaelahas joined
fuanahas joined
fuanahas left
fuanahas joined
florettahas joined
debaclehas joined
fuanahas left
MattJ
I need to merge Zash's PRs 🙂
florettahas left
Dele Olajidehas joined
antranigvhas left
Dele Olajidehas left
fuanahas joined
Steve Killehas left
fuanahas left
antranigvhas joined
antranigvhas left
papatutuwawahas joined
Steve Killehas joined
mathijshas left
mathijshas joined
mathijshas left
antranigvhas joined
Andrzejhas left
Andrzejhas joined
krauqhas left
krauqhas joined
Andrzejhas left
mathijshas joined
Andrzejhas joined
nycohas left
fuanahas joined
nycohas joined
fuanahas left
Wojtekhas joined
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
ti_gj06has left
fuanahas joined
fuanahas left
fuanahas joined
papatutuwawahas left
fuanahas left
ti_gj06has joined
antranigvhas left
Andrzejhas left
nycohas left
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
Andrzejhas joined
MattJ
Who currently implements XEP-0444: Message Reactions (or plans to)? edhelas, larma?
LNJhas joined
mathieui
edhelas does, afaik; I have an up-to-date slixmpp implementation and I need to go back to the POC branch I made for poezio 3 years ago
fuanahas joined
edhelas
I do
fuanahas left
fuanahas joined
MattJ
Ok, thanks. Sounds like the path forward then :)
MattJ
The only thing that worries me with this approach is correctly aggregating the reactions for display in the UI
emus
MattJ: there was a request for Monal as well. but I guess that is not a priority
MattJ
The deployment that wants this is currently using Converse.js, and it's struggling enough with sync problems already. But that's likely just something that needs fixing in Converse.js...
Wojtekhas left
fuanahas left
mathijshas left
mathijshas joined
Adihas left
Wojtekhas joined
edhelas
I choosed to display it the Signal/Discord way (simple quote), and not the Slack/Mattermost way (threads)
oh no wait, I though we were talking about Reply, not Reactions
mathieui
edhelas, that’s not 0444, isn’t it?
edhelas
Yeah reactions have counts and aggregation :) My bad
MattJ
Ah, k :)
mathijshas left
edhelas
Works pretty well and its used quite a lot on Movim :)
MattJ
I was going to say, people like to use them for polls, so counting is generally required for that use-case
edhelas
I think it's a pretty good XEP, not that hard to implement and just "do the job"
mathieui
(and since you are supposed to fill the gaps in history with MAM, if you get the original message, you also get the reactions as well)
MattJ
Well, obviously something like logs.xmpp.org wouldn't be able to display reactions
Zash
Sure it could, as long as you don't react to something from yesterday
mathieui
true
MattJ
Zash, right, but in the case of polls people will get unhappy about incorrect counts ;)
MattJ
In a "product" I can easily imagine someone making the call that there is a valid time window for reactions, and after that they are ignored
nycohas joined
fuanahas joined
Guushas left
Zash
If you're going to react to something from a long long time ago, you'll have to excuse me for not doing that without support from the storage layer.
Wojtekhas left
Zash
MattJ, looking forward to yet another complete redesign of the storage layer? 🙂
MattJ
:S
edhelas
Might be fixed along MIX when it will arrive, soon â„¢
edhelas
*along with
Andrzej
for a reactions and proper counting storage would need to support something like https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0422.html
Andrzejhas left
Zash
I found the argument that aggregation will need per-spec rules convincing.
Kev
I think whatever you do, you don’t want per-spec fetching, though. I think you want that aggregated.
Kev
So even if you don’t want 422, I think you need 427 (give or take).
fuanahas left
Andrzejhas joined
inkyhas joined
antranigvhas joined
mathijshas joined
Andrzejhas left
marekhas left
marekhas joined
alacerhas joined
alacerhas left
Andrzejhas joined
SamWhited
Hi, where do board minutes live? I went to the mailing list but I don't see any for this year
govanifyhas left
govanifyhas joined
MattJ
The members mailing list is the official destination
Andrzejhas left
MattJ
I'm not sure how many meetings there have been so far this year, but at least one of them had me as the minute-taker and I haven't got around to writing them up yet
MattJ
Unfortunately finding volunteer minute-takers got increasingly hard the past couple of terms
marekhas left
marekhas joined
Andrzejhas joined
inkyhas left
inkyhas joined
Adihas left
florettahas joined
Adihas joined
andyhas left
ti_gj06has left
Andrzejhas left
SamWhited
Thanks. FWIW if volunteers are the issue I'm happy to help. As long as I'm not part of the meeting I can take minutes (if it's something I'm in I can't for the life of me pay attention and take minutes at the same time)
adiaholichas left
esilhas joined
esilhas left
antranigvhas left
antranigvhas joined
adiaholichas joined
Steve Killehas left
emus
Maybe we can ask each members to once a year to do this?
Zash
I hear the key to good meeting minutes is to write them before the meeting.
serge90has left
Steve Killehas joined
Kev
Is someone channeling their inner Kev?
papatutuwawahas joined
MattJ
Write minutes, skip the meeting
andrey.ghas joined
emus
Sounds like time traveling - nice!
Zash
You see, before the meeting, they're called "agenda".
Zash
And "suggested decisions"
mathijshas left
Zash
And above ground the magma is called lava. Wait, what were we talking about?
fuanahas joined
mathijshas joined
mathijshas left
mathijshas joined
fuanahas left
mathijshas left
stpeterhas joined
stpeterhas left
serge90has joined
ti_gj06has joined
matkorhas left
inkyhas left
inkyhas joined
serge90has left
neshtaxmpphas left
serge90has joined
emus
^^ agenda =/= meeting minutes
emus
but we are getting off-topic
Zash
meeting minutes := agenda + decisions
Andrzejhas joined
Syndacehas left
Syndacehas joined
fuanahas joined
papatutuwawahas left
fuanahas left
Kev
MattJ: That was (I’m assuming you wrote it) a very good post.