XSF Discussion - 2021-03-16

In 397 is it deliberate that HT-SHA-256-ENDP and HT-SHA-256-UNIQ are both SHOULD? flow? The text is written as if they’ve different levels, but SHOULD and RECOMMENDED are the same.

Kev, could very well be, I tend to confuse those two as being different ✏

Kev, could very well be, I tend to mistakenly believe that those two are being different. ✏

jonas’: is there any Editor formalism required in advance to make me author of 0280 and to issue another "Last" Call?

Ge0rG, that is council formalism

changing ownership needs to go through council IIRC

Not if the previous authors want to add the new author.

buuut, if you just want to shepherd '280 through LC, you don’t need to be author

XEP-0001 says: > In case the XEP has been abandoned by its author(s), any other individual can propose advancement in their stead. The Approving Body will then require a Document Shepherd to take on responsibilities on behalf of the XEP author during the proposal and approval processes.

I guess this is a little woolly as Joe just said he was happy for someone else to author, but didn’t specifically say Georg, so maybe Council giving the nod would be sensible. ✏

Might be a good addition to the Agenda then

So I guess it comes down to whether Ge0rG wants to do any substanial edits or just get it LC'd

Time to order "Get Carbons Done!" hats?

As it happens, I'll probably not attend tomorrow anyway