XSF Discussion - 2021-03-25

  1. ajeremias has joined
  2. alameyo has left
  3. menel has left
  4. croax has left
  5. alameyo has joined
  6. BASSGOD has left
  7. BASSGOD has joined
  8. Zash has left
  9. Zash has joined
  10. alameyo has left
  11. marc0s has left
  12. ajeremias has left
  13. marc0s has joined
  14. stp has left
  15. lovetox has left
  16. arc has left
  17. arc has joined
  18. stp has joined
  19. stp has left
  20. LNJ has left
  21. ti_gj06 has left
  22. lskdjf has left
  23. arc has left
  24. arc has joined
  25. benharri has left
  26. benharri has joined
  27. pjn has left
  28. pjn has joined
  29. benharri has left
  30. arc Ralphm are you going to send an email to the board list?
  31. bean has left
  32. benharri has joined
  33. govanify has left
  34. govanify has joined
  35. pjn has left
  36. pjn has joined
  37. govanify has left
  38. govanify has joined
  39. Calvin has joined
  40. pjn has left
  41. Calvin has left
  42. Calvin has joined
  43. pjn has joined
  44. alameyo has joined
  45. alameyo has left
  46. pjn has left
  47. Calvin has left
  48. govanify has left
  49. govanify has joined
  50. Calvin has joined
  51. adiaholic has joined
  52. pjn has joined
  53. Calvin has left
  54. Calvin has joined
  55. Calvin has left
  56. wgreenhouse has left
  57. wgreenhouse has joined
  58. Yagiza has joined
  59. govanify has left
  60. govanify has joined
  61. wgreenhouse has left
  62. Neustradamus has left
  63. Neustradamus has joined
  64. wgreenhouse has joined
  65. wgreenhouse has left
  66. wgreenhouse has joined
  67. aidalgol has left
  68. lovetox has joined
  69. chronosx88 has left
  70. chronosx88 has joined
  71. govanify has left
  72. govanify has joined
  73. aidalgol has joined
  74. wgreenhouse has left
  75. aidalgol has left
  76. govanify has left
  77. govanify has joined
  78. eevvoor has left
  79. eevvoor has joined
  80. govanify has left
  81. govanify has joined
  82. BASSGOD has left
  83. adiaholic has left
  84. eevvoor has left
  85. eevvoor has joined
  86. adiaholic has joined
  87. BASSGOD has joined
  88. wgreenhouse has joined
  89. adiaholic has left
  90. wgreenhouse has left
  91. BASSGOD has left
  92. adiaholic has joined
  93. BASSGOD has joined
  94. alameyo has joined
  95. BASSGOD has left
  96. alameyo has left
  97. eevvoor has left
  98. eevvoor has joined
  99. andrey.g has left
  100. BASSGOD has joined
  101. adiaholic has left
  102. adiaholic has joined
  103. Neustradamus has left
  104. Neustradamus has joined
  105. govanify has left
  106. govanify has joined
  107. alameyo has joined
  108. govanify has left
  109. govanify has joined
  110. adiaholic has left
  111. adiaholic has joined
  112. andy has joined
  113. aidalgol has joined
  114. karoshi has joined
  115. govanify has left
  116. govanify has joined
  117. paul has joined
  118. paul has left
  119. paul has joined
  120. marek has joined
  121. adiaholic has left
  122. APach has left
  123. wgreenhouse has joined
  124. Tobias has joined
  125. peetah has left
  126. peetah has joined
  127. wgreenhouse has left
  128. govanify has left
  129. govanify has joined
  130. eevvoor has left
  131. ti_gj06 has joined
  132. eevvoor has joined
  133. fuana has joined
  134. govanify has left
  135. govanify has joined
  136. eevvoor has left
  137. eevvoor has joined
  138. wurstsalat has joined
  139. eevvoor has left
  140. eevvoor has joined
  141. fuana has left
  142. Nekit has left
  143. Nekit has joined
  144. chronosx88 has left
  145. chronosx88 has joined
  146. wgreenhouse has joined
  147. APach has joined
  148. chronosx88 has left
  149. chronosx88 has joined
  150. wgreenhouse has left
  151. mathijs has left
  152. mathijs has joined
  153. wgreenhouse has joined
  154. marc has joined
  155. Guus has joined
  156. marek has left
  157. marek has joined
  158. marc has left
  159. Guus has left
  160. debacle has joined
  161. marc has joined
  162. marc has left
  163. marc has joined
  164. goffi has joined
  165. croax has joined
  166. neshtaxmpp has left
  167. chronosx88 has left
  168. chronosx88 has joined
  169. LNJ has joined
  170. menel has joined
  171. marc has left
  172. eric has left
  173. eric has joined
  174. chronosx88 has left
  175. chronosx88 has joined
  176. Andrzej has joined
  177. Syndace has left
  178. Syndace has joined
  179. andy has left
  180. bean has joined
  181. bean has left
  182. eevvoor has left
  183. peetah has left
  184. peetah has joined
  185. eevvoor has joined
  186. nyco has joined
  187. peetah has left
  188. peetah has joined
  189. ralphm Again?
  190. jonas’ moparisthebest, what did you dooooooooooo
  191. Andrzej has left
  192. ralphm That RFC on TLS 1.0/1.1 depreciation weirdly references 3920 and not 6120. I guess I need to put in an erratum.
  193. werdan has joined
  194. Sam has left
  195. jonas’ 21:10:12 flow> L29Ah, right, but it's not rocket science i'd say :) it is not... it is SOCKET SCIENCE!!
  196. jonas’ (also, good morning, have some coffee everyone)
  197. ralphm Ooooh
  198. Paganini has left
  199. ralphm FWIW, I recently had to debug TCP keepalives in combination with unexpectedly dropped connections (not XMPP), and it is weird and hard.
  200. Paganini has joined
  201. nyco has left
  202. Kev Well, at least jonas’ has ensured today isn’t a total loss.
  203. ralphm For sure
  204. stp has joined
  205. eevvoor has left
  206. neshtaxmpp has joined
  207. eevvoor has joined
  208. wgreenhouse has left
  209. fuana has joined
  210. stp has left
  211. stp has joined
  212. andy has joined
  213. marc has joined
  214. Zash Did someone say coffee?
  215. wgreenhouse has joined
  216. APach has left
  217. APach has joined
  218. werdan has left
  219. eevvoor has left
  220. eevvoor has joined
  221. eevvoor has left
  222. eevvoor has joined
  223. ajeremias has joined
  224. APach has left
  225. Kev Covfefe
  226. Sam has joined
  227. bean has joined
  228. APach has joined
  229. lskdjf has joined
  230. chronosx88 has left
  231. chronosx88 has joined
  232. andy has left
  233. xecks has left
  234. xecks has joined
  235. aidalgol has left
  236. fuana has left
  237. fuana has joined
  238. edhelas https://nlnet.nl/project/Movim-OMEMO/
  239. bean has left
  240. edhelas :)
  241. edhelas i'll do some official communications soon™
  242. Neustradamus About RFCs, some people think that it is not needed to list all linked RFCs, only one... I have done several remarks about current I-Ds.
  243. Neustradamus Sam ^
  244. mdosch has left
  245. mdosch has joined
  246. stp has left
  247. stp has joined
  248. andy has joined
  249. Daniel edhelas: congrats. Pretty cool that we now have at least 5 projects supported by nlnet/ngi.zero
  250. fuana has left
  251. fuana has joined
  252. Steve Kille has left
  253. Steve Kille has joined
  254. bean has joined
  255. Andrzej has joined
  256. Nekit has left
  257. emus has joined
  258. alameyo has left
  259. APach has left
  260. emus edhelas: N e w s l e t t e r 😀
  261. bean has left
  262. dwd It'd be good to do some Twitter [etc] announcements here, too.
  263. emus Daniel: yeah I thought so too
  264. APach has joined
  265. adiaholic has joined
  266. eevvoor has left
  267. andrey.g has joined
  268. fuana has left
  269. fuana has joined
  270. govanify has left
  271. govanify has joined
  272. millesimus has left
  273. millesimus has joined
  274. adiaholic has left
  275. deuill has left
  276. deuill has joined
  277. adiaholic has joined
  278. adiaholic has left
  279. APach has left
  280. adiaholic has joined
  281. fuana has left
  282. fuana has joined
  283. goffi has left
  284. andrey.g has left
  285. eevvoor has joined
  286. ti_gj06 has left
  287. paul has left
  288. paul has joined
  289. adiaholic has left
  290. adiaholic has joined
  291. eric edhelas: Which OMEMO version do you aim for? Older one for compat or like Kaidan the latest version?
  292. adiaholic has left
  293. adiaholic has joined
  294. APach has joined
  295. lovetox has left
  296. lovetox has joined
  297. Kev has left
  298. Kev has joined
  299. fuana has left
  300. edhelas eric the old one yes :)
  301. edhelas i'm starting with the basics
  302. Calvin has joined
  303. Andrzej has left
  304. Guus has joined
  305. Wojtek has joined
  306. adiaholic has left
  307. APach has left
  308. APach has joined
  309. Guus has left
  310. peetah has left
  311. adiaholic has joined
  312. goffi has joined
  313. adiaholic has left
  314. adiaholic has joined
  315. adiaholic has left
  316. peetah has joined
  317. Syndace has left
  318. Syndace has joined
  319. adiaholic has joined
  320. APach has left
  321. APach has joined
  322. goffi has left
  323. ti_gj06 has joined
  324. fuana has joined
  325. fuana has left
  326. Andrzej has joined
  327. fuana has joined
  328. goffi has joined
  329. Andrzej has left
  330. adiaholic has left
  331. goffi has left
  332. adiaholic has joined
  333. mathijs has left
  334. mathijs has joined
  335. mathijs has left
  336. APach has left
  337. APach has joined
  338. mathijs has joined
  339. fuana has left
  340. APach has left
  341. APach has joined
  342. Wojtek has left
  343. ti_gj06 has left
  344. fuana has joined
  345. Paganini has left
  346. Paganini has joined
  347. ti_gj06 has joined
  348. adiaholic has left
  349. fuana has left
  350. fuana has joined
  351. adiaholic has joined
  352. Kev has left
  353. Kev has joined
  354. Paganini has left
  355. Paganini has joined
  356. Andrzej has joined
  357. ti_gj06 has left
  358. Andrzej has left
  359. arc has left
  360. arc has joined
  361. purplebeetroot has joined
  362. fuana has left
  363. fuana has joined
  364. Paganini has left
  365. Paganini has joined
  366. Guus has joined
  367. ti_gj06 has joined
  368. Guus has left
  369. mdosch has left
  370. mdosch has joined
  371. goffi has joined
  372. ti_gj06 has left
  373. ti_gj06 has joined
  374. adiaholic has left
  375. ti_gj06 has left
  376. ti_gj06 has joined
  377. adiaholic has joined
  378. fuana has left
  379. fuana has joined
  380. Zash has left
  381. Zash has joined
  382. arc has left
  383. adiaholic has left
  384. Kev has left
  385. Kev has joined
  386. Wojtek has joined
  387. fuana has left
  388. fuana has joined
  389. ti_gj06 has left
  390. LNJ has left
  391. LNJ has joined
  392. Kev has left
  393. Kev has joined
  394. Kev has left
  395. Kev has joined
  396. alacer has left
  397. alacer has joined
  398. arc has joined
  399. arc has left
  400. arc has joined
  401. arc has left
  402. arc has joined
  403. arc has left
  404. Neustradamus has left
  405. Neustradamus has joined
  406. Kev has left
  407. Kev has joined
  408. ti_gj06 has joined
  409. arc has joined
  410. arc Who do we have for the board meeting?
  411. fuana has left
  412. MattJ o/
  413. Neustradamus has left
  414. arc Two of us!
  415. Zash That's quorum?
  416. arc Is it 50% or 51%?
  417. arc I mean I'm sure we're going to get a third person. At least Ralph. Though I would really hope we get everyone today since we have not had a meeting in a month
  418. ralphm bangs gavel
  419. ralphm 0. Welcome + Agenda
  420. ralphm Hi!
  421. ralphm Who do we have and do you have any agenda items?
  422. arc o/
  423. marc has left
  424. ralphm MattJ should be around still. dwd?
  425. marc has joined
  426. pasdesushi has joined
  427. Steve Kille has left
  428. MattJ I'm here, and I have an agenda item... muc.xmpp.org moderation stuff
  429. ralphm noted
  430. marc has left
  431. marc has joined
  432. ralphm Ok, it seems no dwd today.
  433. marc has left
  434. ralphm 1. Minute taker
  435. Steve Kille has joined
  436. Steve Kille has left
  437. ralphm I think MattJ is up
  438. Steve Kille has joined
  439. LNJ has left
  440. MattJ ok
  441. ralphm 2. muc.xmpp.org moderation
  442. ralphm Take it away
  443. marc has joined
  444. MattJ Ok, the background is that operators@muc.xmpp.org, the venue we provide and promote as a place for XMPP service operators to gather and communicate, has become something of a centre point for a section of the broader XMPP community
  445. pasdesushi has left
  446. MattJ By broader I mean, beyond people typically involved in standards development within the XSF
  447. marc has left
  448. ralphm nods
  449. marc has joined
  450. MattJ It's well over 100 occupants these days, and a recent event/drama involving a few individuals blew up into a moderation nightmare
  451. LNJ has joined
  452. mathijs has left
  453. mathijs has joined
  454. MattJ Currently it's just you and me as owners there (probably because we're admins of the MUC service), and I don't really have time to dedicate to properly keeping the channel civil when things like that occur (which as the community continues to grow, probably will increase in frequency)
  455. mathijs has left
  456. MattJ I got criticised by both sides of the fall-out for the moderation actions I did take (banning a few people, and revoking voice for non-members for a period of time)
  457. MattJ What's missing:
  458. MattJ 1) More admins to help out
  459. MattJ 2) Clear guidelines as to what is and isn't accepted behaviour
  460. dwd Hiya, sorry I'm late.
  461. ralphm Well,
  462. MattJ I have at least one person who is willing to volunteer as a moderator, but only if we have (2) in place
  463. ralphm (hi dwd)
  464. Kev You’re referring essentially to a CoC aren’t you?
  465. MattJ Kev, you said it, not me... :)
  466. dwd I think setting up AUPs for xmpp.org is sensible.
  467. MattJ In this particular instance, I specifically want to solve the operators@ issue, because that's been the biggest difficulty recently
  468. Sam From the peanut gallery: I am also willing to help moderate (but only if we actually write a CoC or similar regulations that I can follow. I am also willing to help write those. I suspect others would be willing to volunteer for both as well.)
  469. ralphm First off: the operators@xmpp.org mailinglist and operators@muc.xmpp.org are hosted by us as a gift to the community. With MattJ as ED, you can basically moderate how you see fit.
  470. MattJ But I don't know how much sense it makes to have guidelines for one channel but not for others on muc.xmpp.org
  471. arc I agree
  472. Kev About >< this much sense, I think.
  473. Sam sense: 1px;
  474. MattJ Which then follows to the question of whether we want guidelines for all XSF discussion venues in general, because we notably have none right now
  475. Kev (although the guidelines could potentially be different for XSF vs non-XSF rooms I guess)
  476. LNJ has left
  477. fuana has joined
  478. ralphm I'd summarize guidelines as: a) Be civil, b) stay on topic, particularly when asked.
  479. arc We still have the code of conduct, don't we? It was seem fairly straightforward to use that for everything in person and online
  480. marc has left
  481. ralphm I don't recall the XSF ever drafting or accepting an explicit CoC.
  482. Kev Nor me.
  483. marc has joined
  484. MattJ I'm not aware of any CoC, if there is such a thing then the whole issue is hopefully solved
  485. arc Ugh. Well let's switch the topic to that then because we really do need one
  486. ajeremias has left
  487. Sam Might I recommend starting from: https://www.contributor-covenant.org/
  488. MattJ Yeah, that pretty much is the topic I think
  489. arc We just had a big discussion about that on FOSS foundations. StPeter I think was involved in that discussion
  490. arc 2020-2021 has been the time for all the foundations to get a coc worked out
  491. arc has left
  492. arc has joined
  493. fuana has left
  494. MattJ My main problem is that I'm uneasy with the drama that has followed CoC adoption at many of the other FOSS orgs
  495. Kev I don’t think that’s unreasonable. Equally though, without a CoC (and enforcement), you’re open to all sorts of other drama.
  496. arc Recently?
  497. MattJ I'm not saying that's a reason not to have a CoC, but (at least from my perspective, which may well not be universal), we've not had problems in the community that a CoC would be needed to address
  498. ralphm I am not sure how to coherently put this in a few sentences, but let me try this. I admire the concept of CoCs in general, but I've seen the downsides of them in practice, too. Particularly the enforcement part. Either it is not (consistently) done, or the people doing it find it draining and don't want to do it (anymore). I think that was also partially what the FOSS Foundations thread was about.
  499. marc has left
  500. ralphm And what MattJ said
  501. marc has joined
  502. Kev MattJ: That’s fair. I don’t think we’re immune so much as lucky, though.
  503. MattJ And yes, the issue of enforcement is very much tangled up in this - it's very well to say something, but handling actual violations correctly is extremely hard
  504. MattJ Kev, I agree
  505. Kev If we had a CoC, we would have to enforce it. If we enforce it it will be very expensive (in effort/attention) if it’s ever needed.
  506. MattJ (but operators@ recently crossed the line, I think the luck ends here)
  507. Kev And given that it would presumably cover some moderate traffic MUCs...
  508. nad200 has joined
  509. Kev I’m intruiged by the operators@ stuff now, but I guess that’s a story for another time.
  510. Kev I’m intriged by the operators@ stuff now, but I guess that’s a story for another time.
  511. Kev I’m intrigued by the operators@ stuff now, but I guess that’s a story for another time.
  512. ralphm I haven't followed the operators@ issue, and cannot comment on how that crossed a line and whether drastic measures are required as a result, though.
  513. dwd As I say, I think bringing in a written policy of some form would be sensible. A CoC is clearly part of that. I will commit to writing more in detail on the board@ list this week.
  514. MattJ As far as I'm concerned that issue is dealt with, but I don't want it to happen again
  515. ralphm dwd: thanks
  516. MattJ Thanks dwd
  517. MattJ The document Sam linked seems pretty decent
  518. jonas’ as someone who was somewhat caught up in the turmoil in operators@: yes, some rules for that MUC are definitely a good idea.
  519. ralphm MattJ in the mean time, I'm happy for you to appoint deputies as moderators. But note that my happiness is not a requirement, you have executive power on this.
  520. jonas’ as someone who was somewhat caught in the turmoil in operators@: yes, some rules for that MUC are definitely a good idea.
  521. MattJ Sure. But so far all volunteers want some rules/guidelines in place before helping out
  522. MattJ Which is understandable
  523. ralphm Can we start with the very short ones I listed above?
  524. dwd I am willing to actively work on the rules, guidelines, policies, and so on.
  525. Sam If you need help before then, I suppose I'd be willing as long as I knew we were moving towards having a CoC. I am also willing to actively work on them too.
  526. LNJ has joined
  527. Calvin has left
  528. marc has left
  529. arc I have always said that the best coat of conduct are about the playfield and not the fence. Instead of focusing on behavior we don't want to see, it should focus on the behavior that we want to exemplify
  530. ralphm arc: right, that's why I tried to phrase my very short two guidelines accordingly.
  531. nad200 has left
  532. ralphm (As an example, I had to look for it for a bit, I came across this: https://jan-krueger.net/mincoc/)
  533. arc No that's really not good. Way to subjective. Some of the worst CoC are like "Be Excellent To Each Other"
  534. Zash I'm a fan of the code of "what would MattJ say", it's worked very well in the Prosody channel. :)
  535. MattJ So it looks like we're in agreement about an organization-wide document, and dwd has offered to write some initial stuff up on-list
  536. arc As an organization made almost entirely of white men, the CoC really needs to set up a foundation for expanding that. Including addressing behavior that we are otherwise blind to.
  537. ralphm arc: I understand that point, but I've also witnessed a lot of drama over explicit CoCs like the PSF's in 2019.
  538. nad200 has joined
  539. moparisthebest ugh wild assumptions, or I missed the "race and gender" column when filling out my XSF application
  540. arc Yeah I was a back-end contributor on that and most of the people who were creating drama were the people the code of conduct were created to address
  541. arc Moparisbest I said most.
  542. Sam I have data about this somewhere if I can dig it up, as far as participating members go that's not an assumption.
  543. moparisthebest I don't even know how you could possibly know "most"
  544. Sam It was 95.something% of active members, IIRC
  545. MattJ I've no idea how or why you have such data...
  546. Sam (based on self identification, I can't remember the sample size compared to the entire XSF)
  547. moparisthebest https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/index.php?search=race&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/index.php?search=gender&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go only some "race conditions" stuff
  548. Sam I tried to do a survey a few years ago that I thought would be helpful in understanding the state of the XSF. I wanted to keep doing it every year, but the results weren't very useful the first year because of the lack of diversity. I should have kept doing it so that I could track if that changed
  549. moparisthebest let's not make up problems where they don't exist
  550. Daniel Not to derail this discussion but I would really like to see a more diverse group of people. But I'm not sure if employing a CoC will do a lot to help in this regard
  551. ralphm I think a lot of good points were raised here, and I think it is good for the discussion to continue. For this board meeting, though, I suggest we let dwd indeed start drafting, and end the meeting in light of time.
  552. Daniel It obviously won't hurt either
  553. MattJ As far as I'm concerned the CoC and diversity (or lack thereof) are two different issues
  554. moparisthebest ^
  555. arc I would say it absolutely would help, as someone who mentored a female who did join the XSF and did not renew, and found that the organization was rather off-putting.
  556. moparisthebest in that case I find the XSF's blatant anti-GPL stance very offputting, I want an entire chapter in the CoC dedicated to being inclusive to GPL advocates
  557. moparisthebest or... you know, just make it about behavior alone and not
  558. Sam They're not the same issue, but there is some overlap. A visible CoC that's enforced can make some people feel comfortable applying when they otherwise wouldn't, or deter the people who would harras them from applying. Both are at least somewhat beneficial.
  559. dwd moparisthebest, What anti-GPL stance?
  560. MattJ Seconded ralphm's motion to end the meeting :)
  561. arc Third
  562. MattJ I have a headache and need to move on with my evening
  563. ralphm 3. Date of Next +1 W 4. Close Thanks all! /me bangs gavel
  564. arc I am sitting in a parking lot in my car waiting to pick up a prescription 😂
  565. MattJ Thanks ralphm, I'll aim to get minutes out tomorrow
  566. dwd I am rebooting random databases while trying to fix software.
  567. ralphm Please continue discussing, of course.
  568. Sam dwd: if you need help on any of this, feel free to ping me. I am happy to just be a researcher, to help draft, to help come up with a policy for enforcement, etc. whatever you need.
  569. fuana has joined
  570. dwd Sam, I'll certainly ask your advice.
  571. moparisthebest to be clear I was being sarcastic to make a point, I don't want a section in the CoC about GPL any more than "we promise to be extra nice to X people"
  572. arc moparisthebest: I have found that to be true as well, and I am also very much pro AGPL myself. But thats not really what a code of conduct is for.
  573. arc Ah ok.
  574. Sam I am no expert, this isn't something I've been directly involved in at other organizations, but I do have hands and an internet connection and can make a few spare cycles :)
  575. moparisthebest right, I don't know why the CoC needs to group people at all
  576. Daniel AGPL? That's the worst GPL
  577. Sam Not sure if sarcastic ⤴️, but I agree
  578. arc Exactly. And I am perfectly fine with you sharing your opinion on that. But it also don't feel all that comfortable sharing personal details here either, including my preferred pronouns
  579. Wojtek has left
  580. arc And we know that there are female members who use male names and don't feel comfortable with their gender being known
  581. moparisthebest see I think the AGPL is the only license worth using period, I'm feeling very outnumbered and unwelcomed (last part again is sarcasm, I don't feel unwelcome :P)
  582. Sam Right; jokes aside, the difference is that GPL users aren't a historically marginalized group that are frequently targeted because of something that's a part of their identity.
  583. Sam Using the GPL is a choice that anyone may or may not make.
  584. arc I know for a fact that we have one transgender member who has been very clear that they don't want this known.
  585. arc +1 Sam
  586. dwd arc, FWIW, I assume people's preferred pronouns are "they/them" until I'm corrected. It solves a lot of embarrassment.
  587. arc That's good because those are my preferred pronouns 😅
  588. moparisthebest I prefer to address people by whatever they chose by pressing "tab" :)
  589. ajeremias has joined
  590. arc And of course we have not even breached the topic of race
  591. arc I'm not saying that the community is toxic by any stretch, or that CoC is 100% vital, or any of that. In fact I mis-remembered that I worked on the CoC a few years ago. It must have been a different organization
  592. fuana has left
  593. arc But as much as forming a CoC can create drama, it can also invite broader, more diverse participation. There has been a ton of drama in many large FOSS organizations but each of them that went through this came out more diverse and more inclusive
  594. marc has joined
  595. Sam Entirely anecdotal, but at the like 2 places I've been where creating a CoC caused drama, the people getting all mad about a CoC were the same people that had previously been moderated and used the excuse "But it's not written down anywhere, how am I supposed to know that what I did was against the rules?". I try to assume good faith most of the time, but I have a hard time with at least those examples.
  596. nad200 has left
  597. Kev Sam: I’m not going to disagree with that, but I think it’s also worth not discounting that there may be drama because of such a thing, and that it might be draining for those involved.
  598. Sam Oh yes, absolutely. There was still drama, never-the-less.
  599. Kev I don’t think we have many active members within the XSF itself who are likely to cause large amounts of drama over this, but a) I could be wrong and b) I wouldn’t like to swear it’d be 0.
  600. Kev (I’m assuming that disagreement != drama. I have no doubt whatever’s proposed will see lots of Discussion :) )
  601. fuana has joined
  602. neshtaxmpp has left
  603. Mikaela has joined
  604. nad200 has joined
  605. Mikaela has left
  606. arc I think it's less about problems, than lack of participation. When a lot of new people get involved with an organization, and they go through the phase of figuring out what the group is all about, they are also evaluating whether it's a group they want to be part of
  607. fuana has left
  608. arc My student didn't have anyone say or do anything to her. It was more about what they didn't say or do. Which goes back to what I was saying about a good code of conduct should be about what we want to see, not rules for what's not allowed
  609. Zash The September phase, yes.
  610. Kev September phase?
  611. Daniel I believe part of the problem is that we don't know who we are
  612. arc She also found it incredibly difficult to get involved with Prosody. I don't think anyone ever followed up with her, even though she came in with a lot of energy and excitement.
  613. Kev I am Kev, the Dragonborn.
  614. Daniel and what we do and stand for
  615. Zash From the chaos phase at the start of school years. Especially https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_September
  616. Daniel (not we as individuals obviously but we as an organization)
  617. Kev I do as little as possible, and I stand for less firm people on the bus.
  618. Kev I don’t actually disagree, despite the flippancy.
  619. Daniel and if we say "we" are we talking about the community or of the organization
  620. Kev Zash: Ah.
  621. moparisthebest I think we stand for something to do with xmpp standards ?
  622. moparisthebest it's either that or bike shed construction for sure
  623. mathijs has joined
  624. BASSGOD has left
  625. BASSGOD has joined
  626. karoshi has left
  627. karoshi has joined
  628. Nekit has joined
  629. BASSGOD has left
  630. arc I have the paint samples ready whenever you want to look over the options
  631. Zash Let's build a snowman^W bike shed!
  632. emus I haven't been part of the situation. May someone shortly recap what happened?
  633. Zash 🎵️ we can paint it $color let's build a bikeshed 🎶️
  634. BASSGOD has joined
  635. purplebeetroot has left
  636. moparisthebest tl;dr someone found a MUC they didn't like on a popular server, came to operators to demand it be banned, popular-server-operator didn't want to ban it, accusations of various political affiliations flew, along with threats to blacklist S2S with certain servers, and file legal actions all around and at search.jabber.network
  637. menel has left
  638. menel has joined
  639. L29Ah lol
  640. alameyo has joined
  641. fuana has joined
  642. xecks has left
  643. xecks has joined
  644. Zash If the pandemic ever ends, building an actual bike shed does seem like an interesting team-building exercise.
  645. MattJ arc, sorry to hear that they had difficulty with contributing to Prosody. I can confidently say this is not due to anyone's race, gender or identity... and is not an issue that a CoC would solve. More that we are an open-source project with just a couple of volunteer devs and basically no resources for community management and outreach.
  646. Syndace has left
  647. Syndace has joined
  648. L29Ah i identify myself as community mismanager
  649. karoshi has left
  650. werdan has joined
  651. karoshi has joined
  652. eric has left
  653. ajeremias has left
  654. alameyo has left
  655. Yagiza has left
  656. eric has joined
  657. fuana has left
  658. ajeremias has joined
  659. arc MattJ: it was one of my students in one of her first attempts to contribute to FOSS. I don't know exactly what she did or tried, but she felt ignored.
  660. arc This is feedback not a complaint. The same has been said about me and the projects I manage in the past
  661. MattJ We struggle to keep on top of incoming feature requests and patches, it's a known issue and we're always trying to improve
  662. arc The same could be said for all of us, absolutely
  663. Zash While also trying to not get burnt out
  664. fuana has joined
  665. MattJ But we have high priority issues that need attention in what time we do have, and it's hard to strike a balance
  666. papatutuwawa has joined
  667. Zash But it could just as well have been poor timeing, since both MattJ and I live in euro-time. It does happen that people show up in the middle of the night and ask about things, and nobody is awake to answer.
  668. Zash But it could just as well have been poor timing, since both MattJ and I live in euro-time. It does happen that people show up in the middle of the night and ask about things, and nobody is awake to answer.
  669. Zash PSA: Gonna roll out that new OpenSSL, there may be a short service disruption.
  670. BASSGOD has left
  671. arc I think she's trying to reach out through GitHub or something
  672. arc She was. This is many years ago while she was a freshman in college
  673. Zash Github...
  674. MattJ We're not even on Github)
  675. MattJ Well, we are, but 99% of the project isn't
  676. Zash I feared this was going to be one of those "why aren't you on github yet"
  677. MattJ There is however a clone of our repo on Github made by someone that is always having PRs filed against it
  678. arc I am also not generally a GitHub user for exactly that reason
  679. arc I do not allow forks on GitHub for any of my projects unless they are explicitly renamed to avoid confusion. Every few months I have to search for any confusingly named forks to check for that
  680. krauq has left
  681. fuana has left
  682. Zash Is that a thing you can do?
  683. Zash I thought forks and pull requests were the only things that couldn't be disabled
  684. krauq has joined
  685. Syndace has left
  686. Syndace has joined
  687. MattJ Presumably with the co-operation of the owner
  688. fuana has joined
  689. arc has left
  690. arc has joined
  691. nad200 has left
  692. DebXWoody has left
  693. mdosch has left
  694. eta has left
  695. marc0s has left
  696. flow has left
  697. eta has joined
  698. mathijs has left
  699. mathijs has joined
  700. ti_gj06 has left
  701. sonny has left
  702. sonny has joined
  703. sonny has left
  704. alameyo has joined
  705. emus moparisthebest: thanks for tldr
  706. fuana has left
  707. fuana has joined
  708. BASSGOD has joined
  709. sonny has joined
  710. arc Of course you can, it's called trademark enforcement.
  711. arc In fact if you want to hold on to your trademark you must enforce it
  712. ti_gj06 has joined
  713. arc I have written GitHub several times and had personal forks of my projects renamed to indicate that they were personal forks
  714. MattJ We don't talk about trademarks
  715. Zash 🤐️
  716. alameyo has left
  717. mdosch has joined
  718. debacle has left
  719. debacle has joined
  720. Kev has left
  721. Kev has joined
  722. flow has joined
  723. arc Well you should. Because the night missionario of having hundreds of competing xmpp servers called Prosody, some of it your forks with many of the same features, is a very real possibility if you don't
  724. fuana has left
  725. Daniel Probably a good point to check your priveleges wrt to having the financial resources to register a trademark
  726. Daniel And paying the lawyers to enforce it
  727. peetah has left
  728. moparisthebest how often does that nightmare scenario happen? I'd wager never
  729. peetah has joined
  730. arc Well it's happened to me twice
  731. deuill has left
  732. arc Well I guess more than twice if you include both directions. Usually any true community forks end up pretty contentious
  733. fuana has joined
  734. marc has left
  735. deuill has joined
  736. Maranda has left
  737. Maranda has joined
  738. mathijs has left
  739. mathijs has joined
  740. fuana has left
  741. fuana has joined
  742. ti_gj06 has left
  743. marc has joined
  744. pasdesushi has joined
  745. DebXWoody has joined
  746. pasdesushi has left
  747. pasdesushi has joined
  748. pasdesushi has left
  749. xecks has left
  750. xecks has joined
  751. DebXWoody has left
  752. chronosx88 has left
  753. chronosx88 has joined
  754. govanify has left
  755. govanify has joined
  756. fuana has left
  757. fuana has joined
  758. xecks has left
  759. xecks has joined
  760. BASSGOD has left
  761. BASSGOD has joined
  762. marc has left
  763. marc has joined
  764. Maranda has left
  765. arc has left
  766. fuana has left
  767. BASSGOD has left
  768. Alex has left
  769. fuana has joined
  770. BASSGOD has joined
  771. marc has left
  772. Alex has joined
  773. aidalgol has joined
  774. fuana has left
  775. goffi has left
  776. werdan has left
  777. xsf has left
  778. fuana has joined
  779. raghavgururajan has left
  780. Paganini has left
  781. raghavgururajan has joined
  782. xsf has joined
  783. Paganini has joined
  784. chronosx88 has left
  785. chronosx88 has joined
  786. Syndace has left
  787. Syndace has joined
  788. papatutuwawa has left
  789. andy has left
  790. fuana has left
  791. fuana has joined
  792. fuana has left
  793. fuana has joined
  794. chronosx88 has left
  795. chronosx88 has joined
  796. chronosx88 has left
  797. chronosx88 has joined
  798. chronosx88 has left
  799. chronosx88 has joined
  800. wurstsalat has left
  801. chronosx88 has left
  802. fuana has left
  803. fuana has joined
  804. alameyo has joined
  805. croax has left
  806. croax has joined
  807. Kev has left
  808. Kev has joined
  809. Kev has left
  810. Steve Kille has left
  811. Steve Kille has joined
  812. Kev has joined
  813. neshtaxmpp has joined
  814. Kev has left
  815. Kev has joined
  816. menel has left
  817. Paganini has left
  818. fuana has left
  819. fuana has joined
  820. Tobias has left
  821. Paganini has joined
  822. Kev has left
  823. Kev has joined
  824. Kev has left
  825. Kev has joined
  826. fuana has left
  827. Kev has left
  828. Kev has joined
  829. deuill has left
  830. deuill has joined
  831. debacle has left
  832. Kev has left
  833. Kev has joined
  834. LNJ has left
  835. stp has left