XSF Discussion - 2021-04-09


  1. flow

    raghavgururajan, I am not sure if "Ignorance" is an argument. Even though something like Matrix sure could have also been build on top of XMPP, People should be allowed to "start from scratch". That's totally valid from an explorative perspective and should be sanctioned

  2. raghavgururajan

    flow: Of course! Exploration is good and anyone is free to work/develop what they like. Just not a candidate for a standard.

  3. raghavgururajan

    Also, the project is beyond exploratory/experimenting phase and still too many investment of effort, time and money to fill the use-cases of existing protocol.

  4. emus

    > flow escribiĆ³: > raghavgururajan, I am not sure if "Ignorance" is an argument. Even though something like Matrix sure could have also been build on top of XMPP, People should be allowed to "start from scratch". That's totally valid from an explorative perspective and should be sanctioned šŸ‘ on the last point (I guess you meant "shouldnt", right)

  5. emus

    raghavgururajan: Is IETF planning to replace XMPP with Matrix?

  6. Zash

    No, but they're running a trial with Matrix, Zulip and Converse.js

  7. Zash

    Zulip seems to be the favorite so far

  8. emus

    Ok. but thats for their internal communication?

  9. Zash

    For meetings and stuff

  10. raghavgururajan

    I got confused that it was for revisiting standards, but seems to be only for internal communications.