-
emus
With some delay, the XMPP Newsletter July 2021: https://fosstodon.org/web/statuses/106720149381323521
-
MattJ
🎉
-
mjk
emus: thank you
-
emus
Yes, but that counts for all the contributors and help!✎ -
emus
Yes, but that counts for all the contributors and their help! ✏
-
deuill
The newsletter is a wonderful resource, keep up the great work!
-
emus
Thanks! Happy you like it
-
mjk
> that counts for all the contributors and their help! Naturally
-
emus
☺
-
Pete
just discovered the April 1 XEPs. Some of these are legit hilarious. XEP-0295 had me ROLLING
-
Pete
100% purebread nerd confirmed
-
MattJ
Believe it or not some people have overlooked the "humorous" label and take than one seriously :)
-
Pete
that's fantastic
-
Pete
I wish I'd gotten on xmpp years ago. This is a great project
-
MattJ
Welcome aboard 🙂
- DebXWoody is deleting the XEP-0295 branch -m "it was 'humorous' /o\ "
-
Zash
ITYM s/humorous/standards track/ and commit -m "it _was_ humorous"
-
DebXWoody
https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0107.html#example-1 Do I have to use item with id=current?
-
Zash
DebXWoody: Many of these extended presence things are usually done as singleton nodes, which means having exactly one (1) item with "current" as item id. Doesn't seem to explicitly say so in the XEP or in PEP, which is a bit odd. https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0060.html#impl-singleton
-
DebXWoody
Ok,.. I got <item id="65C6E2D12D1A9"> but it's just *one* item. Thanks.