-
dwd
.
-
arc
!
-
MattJ
?
-
dwd
¡
-
Zash
‽
-
arc
...
-
MattJ
Quorum, at least. ralphm?
-
arc
Do you want to chair?
-
MattJ
Not particularly, but I can :)
-
dwd
MattJ, Tell you what, you chair and I'll do minutes.
-
MattJ
Trello looks like it needs a sweep, some old stuff there. I think the two items on my radar are approving the fiscal host stuff, and the recent PR for XEP-0001 (rename Draft stage -> Stable)
-
MattJ
0) Roll call
-
dwd
I'm here.
-
MattJ
I think we're here
-
MattJ
Anyone else with items for the agenda?
-
dwd
Sadly not, though I do need to find some time for that CoC again.
-
MattJ
1) Fiscal host policies
-
MattJ
As far as I know this is still outstanding. Has anyone not reviewed it who still wants to? It's been dragging on for a bit.
-
MattJ
https://pad.disroot.org/p/XSF_Fiscal_Host_Rules fwiw
-
dwd
I suggest we write a post on members@ with the rules in, and ask for any last comments.
-
MattJ
I can do that
-
MattJ
2) Renaming 'Draft' stage to 'Stable' in XEP-0001
-
MattJ
PR at https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1100
-
ralphm
Still on holiday. Back next week
-
MattJ
No worries ralphm, enjoy :)
-
MattJ
jonas’, any comments from Editors?
-
dwd
I'm actually find with this rename. Draft was a copy of the IETF's "Draft" stage, which itself has disappeared.✎ -
dwd
I'm actually fine with this rename. Draft was a copy of the IETF's "Draft" stage, which itself has disappeared. ✏
-
dwd
So it's now even harder to explain. Calling it "Stable" seems to convey what it needs to.
-
jonas’
MattJ, no comment from the editors, except that the technical implementation will probably keep Draft in some non-website-visible places for technical reasons.
-
MattJ
wfm
-
jonas’
I sent comments from Council to board@, did those arrive?
-
MattJ
Oh yes, I did see that, thanks
-
MattJ
Okay, I motion we adopt this change to XEP-0001
-
MattJ
+1 from me
-
ralphm
Without context, I still approve. +1
- ralphm good back in holiday mode
-
ralphm
Goes
-
MattJ
2/4
-
dwd
Oh, sorry. +1.
-
MattJ
arc, ?
-
arc
+1
-
MattJ
Great
-
MattJ
I think that's everything then. AOB?
-
jonas’
hm
-
jonas’
should someone have asked members@ or standards@ on the Stable vs. Draft thing?
-
arc
We seem to have already voted on it
-
jonas’
🤷
-
MattJ
If we want to make sure there are no concrete objections, I can send a note out about this too (and say, delay merging the PR by a week)
-
jonas’
I won't touch the PR anyway until tuesday, so that would definitely work for me
-
MattJ
Okay, assuming no other business
-
MattJ
3) Date of next +1W
-
MattJ
4) The End
-
Zash
`<fin/>`
-
jonas’
MattJ (or whomelse may chair): to avoid those awkward pauses, Council has moved to letting everyone raise their AOB during the meeting (thanks asynchronous text chat!), so I typically only break for like 15s or so when the AOB section comes up and then contniue.✎ -
jonas’
MattJ (or whomelse may chair): to avoid those awkward pauses, Council has moved to letting everyone raise their AOB during the meeting (thanks asynchronous text chat!), so I typically only break for like 15s or so when the AOB section comes up and then continue. ✏
-
MattJ
Board meetings are defined by their awkward pauses
-
jonas’
oh no, I hope we didn't destroy a tradition there with council
-
MattJ
Heh
-
dwd
Thanks MattJ.
-
arc
Thx
-
mdosch
> Expenses must be have been pre-approved by the treasurer. https://pad.disroot.org/p/XSF_Fiscal_Host_Rules Might any native speaker check this sentence? For me it seems like the it should be _have been_ instead of _be have been_.
-
Zash
Either of "must {be,have been} pre-approved" makes sense I think
-
Zash
I guess depending on the tense used in the rest of the text
-
mdosch
Then I'd go for _must be pre-approved_.
-
mdosch
But I leave this to the native speakers, but the _be must have been_ just doesn't make sense for me.
-
mdosch
But maybe this is something very british as I often fail to parse very british texts. :D
-
me9
'must be have been' can't work. And 'must have been' sounds weird. 'have to have been' would maybe work. 'must be' sounds good.
-
Zash
If you can't read whatever syntax that is, I meant "must be pre-approved" and "must have been pre-approved" both work, right?
-
me9
I can and I say your second option sounds weird. But maybe it works? 'must be' definitely does work.
-
Zash
Not a native speaker but both sound sane to me.
-
me9
Mhm.
-
Zash
Slightly different meanings tho, something vs past tense
-
me9
True. As you already said, it depends on the rest.
-
theTedd
"must be have been" is wrong (likely just a composition change mid-sentence); "must be pre-approved" is correct; "must have been pre-approved" is also correct, but.. funny; "have to have been" is clunky but in too common usage
-
theTedd
I'd go with "must be pre-approved" or "must have been approved", depending on required meaning
-
mdosch
> If you can't read whatever syntax that is, I meant "must be pre-approved" and "must have been pre-approved" both work, right? That's how I understood it.
-
emus
Not late enough for the end of month XMPP Newsletter reminder 🙂 Please add your project news. You can simply add it via this pad: https://yopad.eu/p/xmpp-newsletter-365days Last addition from August accepted till 2nd of September. Release is planned by 5th of September. Good night to most of you!