XSF Discussion - 2021-09-11


  1. emus

    Hello, is anyone aware of the credentials for the email adress in fosstodon? the protonmail? If not I would like to try to reach out to fosstodon to replace the email. And I would like to once again raise the topic for an email hosted by xsf for commteam. even if its only receiving. (Its also worth to check this for the other accounts we have actually)

  2. emus

    I will also write to members

  3. MattJ

    I don't know the history of this account, but traditionally iteam handles stuff like this and just grants access as needed

  4. MattJ

    Hosting email accounts is not on the iteam roadmap

  5. emus

    yes, but we are hosting members@...

  6. emus

    etc

  7. jonas’

    which is very different

  8. jonas’

    (hosting mailing lists vs. hosting user accounts)

  9. emus

    Ok, but didnt you suggested to have a receiving only account? or a list in that direction?

  10. Zash

    A forward?

  11. emus

    Could also be good, but I think all agree that XSF should have control about this

  12. emus

    I don't understand why I am the only one asking for this

  13. Bung

    Matix and XMPP which one has got more user?

  14. Holger

    WhatsApp has most.

  15. Holger

    And that's XMPP-based!

  16. Holger

    A bit.

  17. Bung

    I between the XMPP and Matrix

  18. Bung

    Which one is more safe?

  19. Daniel

    That's like asking Elon musk whether battery electric or hydrogen cars are going to be the future

  20. Bung

    > Daniel wrote: > That's like asking Elon musk whether battery electric or hydrogen cars are going to be the future 🤣🤣🙄

  21. emus

    Bung: I guess we dont have a good answer to, also you are in a chat where many wi'' advocate for XMPP regardless of the number of users. We also likely dont know exactly as XMPP implementations are often dissolved in internet. also many implementations are closed to specific networks. Some numbers are listed on xmpp.net So you might need to compare what information you can collect on both sides. Furthermore, I recommend to review also other factors when doing your decisions. When you ask about numbers only I guess non of it does the jobs kind of.

  22. Zash

    Recent evidence suggests that we're all tired of people asking "which is better" here and will instead make meta-comments on this.

  23. Bung

    The Matrix seems more resistant to censorship

  24. emus

    XMPP is the best!!

  25. Bung

    > I wrote: > The Matrix seems more resistant to censorship Chat server can run on separate servers

  26. emus

    Well, speaking on my own opinion: I think XMPP is a good choice as it is an open standard, has long experience and offers decentral infrastructure. And I think it has reached some robostness for many of its modules. Innovation and security features is also a thing.

  27. emus

    > Bung escribió: > Chat server can run on separate servers I dont understand what you meant

  28. Bung

    > emus wrote: > I dont understand what you meant One room can exist on two different servers

  29. emus

    ok

  30. Bung

    But public rooms

  31. Ge0rG

    Bung: ask us again which one is better in 10 to 15 years. XMPP has survived all the other chat systems so far, and it will most probably survive matrix as well

  32. Daniel

    What about matrix 4 tho?

  33. wgreenhouse

    > One room can exist on two different servers Bung: meaning that you can cause a DDoS across the whole federation by going after just one room; https://mastodon.matrix.org/@matrix/106494375824965424

  34. Bung

    > wgreenhouse wrote: > Bung: meaning that you can cause a DDoS across the whole federation by going after just one room; https://mastodon.matrix.org/@matrix/106494375824965424 Voov

  35. wgreenhouse

    > participating in a targeted room meaning any server with users visiting #matrix:matrix.org

  36. wgreenhouse

    so much for censorship resistance

  37. wgreenhouse

    the censor just needs to make spambots

  38. wgreenhouse

    > Voov I don't understand

  39. Bung

    Woow

  40. wgreenhouse

    oh

  41. wgreenhouse

    yeah. matrix's claims to resilience are pretty laughable

  42. wgreenhouse

    basically it amplifies any attack

  43. wgreenhouse

    but it's true, people are tired of this question, you've asked it across many channels for months now

  44. Zash

    that's how you build things these days. single-source-of-truth and such nice things are out the window

  45. Zash

    also see activitypub

  46. Bung

    > wgreenhouse wrote: > but it's true, people are tired of this question, you've asked it across many channels for months now Ok. Sorry.

  47. Ge0rG

    Zash: it's a single chain of blocks!

  48. Zash

    Just remember that anytime you publish a block, you need to notify everyone, who then need to DDoS^W fetch it from you.

  49. Ge0rG

    At least that protects you from message loss over broken s2s